Prisons And Hair Dressers Latest To Push Back On Ridiculous Collection Society Demands
from the pay-to-listen dept
We've noticed lately that music collection societies have been going overboard in demanding more and more money from pretty much anyone who listens to music, claiming "public performances" and assuming that they're worth a lot more than they really are -- almost everywhere you turn. mikez sent in two new stories about collection societies -- both involving operations pushing back on the demands.The first involves prisons in the UK who are refusing to pay the licensing fees, and thus are telling prisoners (hey look, real thieves!) that they can't listen to music any more in any area where multiple people might be (the kitchen, workshops, restrooms, etc.) since others might overhear it. Yes, listening to music in a prison apparently requires a separate performance license.
The second story involves Spanish hairdressers who are similarly refusing to pay and, instead, are telling customers to bring their own MP3 players to listen to their own music, privately.
The really ridiculous thing is that in both cases all this is really doing is harming musicians. When places play music, it actually acts as advertising for that music -- and these collection societies are basically demanding to be paid for having people promote the music of various artists. So the artists get less promotion and don't get money from places like the examples above refusing to pay. Everyone loses!
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: collections, hair dressers, music, prisons, spain, uk
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Isn't language mysterious?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Promotional value of prisoners
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Promotional value of prisoners
I know its anecdotal but I started watching Fringe after my brother recommended to me. He started watching it during the last few months of his prison sentence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Promotional value of prisoners
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Artist vs. Collection Society
1. The artist gets free advertising
2. the shop gets a "better ambieance" and draws more customers
3. the collection society gets nothing
This, of course, cannot be good for Society as a whole, people are making money and the old legacy players aren't getting anything, oh No!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Artist vs. Collection Society
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Artist vs. Collection Society
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now if I could just keep those pesky kids off my lawn...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great
Willing to bet that a lot of people discover music by means other than what's on MTV/BET/CMT. Cutting off all those off the beaten path ways of discovering new to you music is a big mistake, unless those agencies really think people are dumb enough to blindly buy music anymore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Great
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Great
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Great
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Great
I recall about 5 years ago I looked at a 24 block of programing on MTV and counted about 8 hours of actual music related material and mind you it wasn't even 8 unique hours but 4 hours played in the afternoon and again in the wee hours.
I honestly don't know why they still have the nerve to call themselves MTV because the music left the building ages ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Great - MTV
I guess you don't have to pay royalties for douche-baggery.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Great - MTV
"I guess you don't have to pay royalties for douche-baggery."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Great
I do the same thing, and I can't tell you how many stupid songs I've bought off Itunes or Amazon MP3 for .99 cents, I've become a paying music consumer above and beyond the music I already buy and pay for. Good way to kill the cash cow, dummies! (the music industry and collection societies). My dentist subscribes to some satellite music service in his office, one where they never identify the songs or the artists. I spend a couple of dollars after every visit buying MP3s online.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In both those cases I would think that the radio would be where they are getting the music.
If that's the case, does that mean if you listen to the radio with someone else....it's a performance? Does that mean we are going to start getting charged performance fees if we listen to the radio in a car with other people?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It dates back to a long-lost time
Fine hotels would have live musicians playing in their lobby restaurants, tea parlors, and ballrooms.
Even the lowly local bar had a live piano player pumping out a lively tune to keep the atmosphere happy and gay (in the older sense of the word).
Then, when recorded music and music systems were installed in these places, musicians were out of jobs. The musicians felt they lost their jobs to recorded music which many places felt could be played for free.
That's when the record industry as well as the musicians unions and other guilds came up with the idea that playing a record in a public place was the same as a public performance. So, while the musicians would no longer collect their salary for playing "live" they would still be compensated by getting a public performance fee.
It might not have been as much as a live, paying gig, but considering that the musician actually didn't have to do any work, the performance fee seemed like a great idea.
Two years ago my father died. At the small family gathering we had in the funeral parlour I played one of his favorite songs as people left the room.
Strictly speaking it was indeed a public performance and I had evaded hiring a live musician. I should have also sent some sort of royalty payment to ASCAP or BMI.
I didn't.
I think going into prisons is way overboard. But if restaurants and bars have to pay royalties for their jukeboxes and piped-in music, I can see the rationale for the prisons.
And as far as hairdressers go, where do you think we got the phrase "Barbershop Quartet?"
It's not an outrageous expectation of being paid. But it does sound strange to our 21st Century world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It dates back to a long-lost time
Its strange when you expect the same (if not more) pay in the 21st that you were getting in the 18th.
Thing is technology has allowed for music to be circulated much more easily and more cheaply yet these agencies are in a mad rush to figure out how to maintain the same profit margin.
If a business spends 1 billion a year and earns 2 billion but them technology allows that business to spend only 1/2 a billion a year what entitles them to that same 2 billion much less an increase to 3 billion. These companies have concluded that since they are spending less they are somehow entitled to more profit.
Hell if that is the case then where is the agency setup to make sure horsebuggy drivers and horse ranchers are still getting paid the same money they made before the automobile came along? The one to pay door to door milkmen the same they made before tech allowed for milk to be sold in stores more easily? The one to pay elevator operators the same they made before users started using them on their own?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Isnt someone already paying?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Isnt someone already paying?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Isnt someone already paying?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
techdirt t-shirts should be free
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: techdirt t-shirts should be free
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: techdirt t-shirts should be free
Every hairdresser or barber shop I've ever been to has 1 of 3 things, radio, satellite radio or Musak. No downloads there either. While digital music is easy to copy not all music is 'downloadable' - there is not one great repository in the sky that all of the plays/performances originate from.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: techdirt t-shirts should be free
http://clear.msu.edu/dennie/clipart/t-shirt.gif
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
on a good note
Some good could come out of this if the members of Parliament become more aware of the absurdities of these things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
public performance
The interesting question would be whether a prison would count as such an establishment. The prison isn't out there to make money. It's essentially a private residence, similar to a college dorm.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Slightly Oversimplified
"The really ridiculous thing is that in both cases all this is really doing is harming musicians."
The collection societies are for the composers (songwriters), authors and publishers. If the musician is the songwriter and not the performing artist then the above is a stretch because the songwriter would have to give up a sure dollar in hand for some future potential dollar that may never materialize.
If the songwriter is also the performer and not touring or active than the above is also a stretch.
If the songwriter is the performing artist and is planning on touring in the near future or is currently touring, then the playing of music in a hair salon acts as a free promo for you. In this instance Mike's statement above would be correct.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Slightly Oversimplified
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let me understand this.
If I have one radio and two people listening, that an unlicensed performance.
How about two radio's and two people listening, is that OK?
Does it have to be a whole radio? How about one radio and a speaker for each person listening?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Easy ripost
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Easy ripost
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ill bet the guards will enjoy telling them NO MORE RADIO
yup lets make real bad ass criminals worse
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I will never...
Money shouldnt be charged for something with no cost. It didnt cost anyone anything for me to play the music (we bought it on CD). Its not a public performance, and we arent making money off of it. It is f-ing background music.
People should really start ditching music with fees and limitations and using creative commons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
re
In fact, there are so many ways people could overhear the music I play that I just don't play it anymore. Which means I don't buy it anymore. This is a small price to pay, I believe, for bailing out the music industry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: re
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Collection Societies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Collecting.
They don't tell anyone how much they collect, no where is written they have to divulge that information to those affected.
Well that is why I don't buy music anymore and movies and other things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To me it's perfectly clear
[ link to this | view in chronology ]