Distributor Claims Microsoft Terminated Partnership After Reps Refused To Take Part In Sex/Drug Party

from the sex,-drugs-and-software-distribution dept

Fri, Jan 29th 2010 7:39am — Mike Masnick

Well, here's a story you don't see every day. Roy alerts us to a report that Israeli software distributor EIM is suing Microsoft over a terminated contract. Microsoft claims the contract was terminated due to filing fraudulent sales reports, but EIM says the real reason was that EIM representatives refused to take part in a sex and drug party aboard a cruise put together by Microsoft for Turkish and Israeli distributors. EIM claims that there were women who would perform sexual services in attendance, as well as some "illegal substances," and EIM representatives were encouraged to partake of both, though they refused. Microsoft has sued back, claiming breach of contract by EIM -- though apparently refuses to comment about the cruise allegations. Of course, you would think that with other distributors on the cruise, some might be able to confirm or deny the allegations -- and if there were any others who chose not to partake, it would be worth knowing if they, too, lost their contracts. The whole thing seems pretty bizarre, frankly. Even if Microsoft apparently did throw such a party, it still seems like EIM would have a tough time proving that its contract was terminated for its representatives' failure to participate.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: drugs, legal fight, orgy, software distribution
Companies: eim, microsoft

49 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

The eejit (profile), 29 Jan 2010 @ 6:56am

Wow. I never knew that not getting laid would cost you a contract.

Maybe it's against MS policy to NOT have sex on a cruise ship.

Just...wow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Boost, 29 Jan 2010 @ 9:50am
  
  Re:
  I know it's against my policy.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tom Landry (profile), 29 Jan 2010 @ 7:44am

I definitely got into the wrong business.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2010 @ 7:46am

hurray for punditry and speculation!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dark Helmet (profile), 29 Jan 2010 @ 7:46am

Question:
When the hell did the Minnesota Vikings execs start working at Microsoft?

Seriously, somewhere Calligula is rolling over in his grave...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Free Capitalist (profile), 29 Jan 2010 @ 8:15am
  
  Re: Question:
  To paraphrase Lewis Black.. "How can you put a bunch 300 pound men on a boat, call them 'Vikings', and NOT expect them to rape and pillage".
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Emo the Libertarian (profile), 29 Jan 2010 @ 1:47pm
    
    Re: Re: Question:
    Nice, i had forgotten that quote...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
SureW (profile), 29 Jan 2010 @ 7:49am

An interesting tactic to combat open source
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- mdwstmusik (profile), 29 Jan 2010 @ 9:18am
  
  Re: open source?
  "EIM claims that there were women who would perform sexual services in attendance"
  
  Sounds like an breeding ground for open sores...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Richard Corsale (profile), 29 Jan 2010 @ 8:32pm
    
    Re: Re: open source?
    If you just did that off the top of your head, you get a whole jar of cookies!
    
    ++;
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Simon, 29 Jan 2010 @ 8:01am

Microsoft : One way or the other, you're going to get screwed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Yakko Warner, 29 Jan 2010 @ 8:36am
  
  Re:
  Comment Win.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ian Lewis, 29 Jan 2010 @ 8:16am

Seems highly unlikely to me
I guess I'm biased, since my wife and I met on a Microsoft-sponsored cruise, but I just don't buy this. I worked for Microsoft for six years. During that time I never saw even one instance of someone being pressured to do anything immoral or illegal. But I did experience many instances where a coworker was disciplined for crossing that line, and many more where my coworkers were offered sex or drugs by other companies, and refused based on MS policy (and, presumably, their own virtue).

So I think it's highly unlikely that any MS employee actively discriminated against a vendor based on willingness to participate in a wild party. At most, there might be a dynamic similar to the "urinal meetings" that are blamed for sexual discrimination: if deals were cut at the party, and a vendor that would have been part of the deal otherwise was excluded because they didn't attend, then that would explain it. Explain, but not excuse--it's still grounds for termination under MS policy.

My guess is that if there's any truth at all to these allegations, heads will roll. If the people responsible are low-level employees, they will be fired; if they're high level, they'll be relieved of their responsibility and put onto a "special project" until they quit of their own accord.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- senshikaze (profile), 29 Jan 2010 @ 8:26am
  
  Re: Seems highly unlikely to me
  so you said all that to basically say this may have actually happened.
  
  That or you are blowing smoke out your ass (pretty sure that was going on too :) )
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Matt (profile), 29 Jan 2010 @ 10:56am
    
    Re: Re: Seems highly unlikely to me
    How did you get that out of "I think it's highly unlikely"?
    
    This is not the kind of marketplace immorality for which Microsoft is known. I do not have Ian's experience with the company, but given my limited interaction with its US headquarters I would be shocked if the allegation were seriously leveled at Redmond. But who knows what goes on in their overseas sales channels? It is just barely possible that some idiot or idiots at the long end of some branch of the Microsoft tree engaged in unethical behavior. It is a big tree, and hard to account for every leaf. I think Ian's point was that if there was such an idiot (and it is impossible to rule the eventuality out,) the idiot once caught will be dealt with harshly - Microsoft will not countenance this sort of behavior. But the fact that that can't be ruled out is no more a statement that it "may have actually happened" then would be the statement that it cannot be ruled out that senshikaze is a fool. Unlikely, but it cannot be ruled out if prior posts were the result of chimps at keyboards or random chance.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - senshikaze (profile), 1 Feb 2010 @ 2:19pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Seems highly unlikely to me
      oh i am a fool. i firmly believe that if you think differently of yourself then you are a much bigger fool than i am.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
pegr, 29 Jan 2010 @ 8:23am

"If the people responsible are low-level employees, they will be fired; if they're high level, they'll be relieved of their responsibility and put onto a "special project" until they quit of their own accord."

Of course, because high-level people don't deserve to get fired, ever!

You, sir, are a perfect example of the immoral Microsoft employee. Congratulations, you elitist swine!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2010 @ 8:30am
  
  Re:
  huh!? How is someone immoral when he's speculating on what he thinks will happen inside the company if the allegations are true?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Lion XL, 29 Jan 2010 @ 8:42am
  
  Re:
  I think he may be alluding to the fact that low-level employees are generally 'at-will' employees, who can be fired at any time.
  
  Higher level employees are usually contracted, and breaching those contracts are usually pretty difficult, almost always ending up with the ex-employee getting a large share of the contractual obligation.
  
  Putting them in room with no windows and a Steve Balmer video would probably be more effective. NO lawyer/court costs, and the employee will probably only suffer through that for a couple of days before he demands an amicable separation for wayyyyyy cheaper than a court ruling.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Matt (profile), 29 Jan 2010 @ 11:05am
    
    Re: Re:
    Steve Ballmer videos may lead to a constructive discharge claim. Safer to bust them down to the mailroom and then catch them with pot.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2010 @ 11:27am
    
    Re: Re:
    Putting high-level Microsoft employees in a room with no Windows? Sounds risky.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Dark Helmet (profile), 29 Jan 2010 @ 11:57am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      "Putting high-level Microsoft employees in a room with no Windows? Sounds risky."
      
      Even riskier for Microsoft employees to try to pick up women on their own instead of using hookers.
      
      After all, it's well known that when it comes to women, Microsoft employees don't have any Mac....
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 30 Jan 2010 @ 1:17am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        You know, they should just put Cagney and Lacey on the case.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\|\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
        
        So rry, I had to find the USB keyboard. You see, my Macbook Pro has a keyboard problem and the company I bought it from has a guy who used to work at an Apple Store and he said it would be covered under the warranty.
        
        This problem should be fixed on Monday.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 30 Jan 2010 @ 3:28am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I wonder if there's an app for that.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        senshikaze (profile), 2 Feb 2010 @ 6:52am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I call it "Hammer"(tm)(c)(r)
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jason, 29 Jan 2010 @ 9:11am
  
  Re:
  Wow totally abusive! The poster gave their honest opinion and best guess based on their history, and you interpret that as Elitist and attack him for giving his opinion. It's obvious you hate Microsoft and your blinders prevent honest discussion. Sad. Next time you quote someone, you might want to be honest and quote the entire thing, begining with "My best guess..." Looking at this HONESTLY and without BIAS his best guess is what most any corporation would do, protect high profile people to limit bad press while dumping low level folks who do not matter. Microsoft did not invent this.
  
  Oh and btw I think Microsoft is the evil empire but that does not cause me to froth at the mouth.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2010 @ 9:19am
  
  Re: High Level People getting fired
  Bing for Stuart Scott, if you really think high-level people don't get fired for immoral acts.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Trails, 29 Jan 2010 @ 9:38am
  
  Re:
  You, sir, missed his point. His point is that in corporate upper echelons, people don't get fired, they get marginalized and are encouraged to resign.
  
  He's stating objective predictions, he makes no statement about his support or disapproval of these actions. In fact, given his statements, one might glean a sense of disillusionment from his conveyance.
  
  Regardless, you trot out childish name calling, committing to the undying memory of the intertubes the fact that you are a person frothing with such self righteous indignation that you can't be bothered to read or discuss rationally.
  
  Hence, you, sir, are the perfect example of an angsty 17 year old (mental age, your actual age notwithstanding). Congratulations, your Che Guevara t shirt must be proud of you.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jon Renaut (profile), 29 Jan 2010 @ 8:38am

New Mac ad
A prostitute is offering you sex and cocaine. Cancel or allow?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Stuart, 29 Jan 2010 @ 9:40am
  
  Re: New Mac ad
  First scan for viruses.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2010 @ 6:26pm
    
    Re: Re: New Mac ad
    ***Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found,Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found,Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found, Ding: Virus found***
    
    ***buffer overrun***
    
    BSOD
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trails, 29 Jan 2010 @ 8:40am

Seems pretty transparent to me
This strikes me as a pretty strenuous attempt to punish Microsoft's reputation for suing them. I certainly accept that a cruise with drugs and hookers might have happened, but I doubt that's why a contract got canceled.

The motivation behind the reason attributed to MS escapes me. MS would not give up a contract for failure to take dope and sex. They aren't that dumb.

Let's be clear, most execs in sales and distribution have their compensation heavily incentivized based on volume. From an organizational standpoint, as well as an individual standpoint, I don't get reducing volume cause someone wasn't "cool".

No org would give up the revenue, and no exec would give up the bonus money the contract would entail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- interval, 29 Jan 2010 @ 9:08am
  
  Re: Seems pretty transparent to me
  Well, from a completely objective view point, it may have been regional execs who were offended that the Israelis didn't get with the program that night. Just a thought.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Trails, 29 Jan 2010 @ 9:31am
    
    Re: Re: Seems pretty transparent to me
    But to the point where they would give up revenue and adversely effect their own performance-based compensation?
    
    It especially seems weird to me that they would then claim that the distributor filed fraudulent sales reports, as that would require fairly substantive evidence.
    
    In such a situation I would think they'd pick something much more ephemeral, something much easier to "fake", as it were.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Rasmus, 29 Jan 2010 @ 11:18am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Seems pretty transparent to me
      Unless the regional execs had been filing fraudulent sales reports on behalf of the distributor and somehow been pocketing the difference themselves. Not partaking in a party meant to collect incriminating evidence useful for blackmailing the distributor into silence, if they found out about the fraud done in their name, created a huge risk for the real criminals. So they jettisoned the distributor, and tried to stick their own fraud on them as a precaution.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2010 @ 5:12pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Seems pretty transparent to me
      "But to the point where they would give up revenue and adversely effect their own performance-based compensation?"
      
      Well, if they were high on cocaine who knows what they might do, you can't expect people on drugs to act reasonably can you?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
DCX2, 29 Jan 2010 @ 8:46am

Heh
Reminds me of the Department of Interior sex and drugs scandal. And the Kabul embassy sex and drugs scandal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2010 @ 9:27am

they didnt read the small print
font size =-8 AND when on any cruise you must partake in sexual and or illicit drug use or this EULA and contract shall expire font too bad we cant use proper tags in this post id have done a real small fine print lol
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2010 @ 11:20am

Other conspiracy theroies
On Monday, someone was on the Daily Show to talk about his twitter account and educational reform. At the tail end of the interview, the guest said something to the likes of "It's easier to develop new vaccines, and it's more straight forward than to develop a personnel system everyone is going to feel great about". The lack of new talking points was weird. Maybe they're shopping for replacements to fill some soon-to-be-announced openings. Who knows.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anony1, 29 Jan 2010 @ 12:19pm

Bravo Trails. Bravo. Class act. Myself? I still prefer calling out the occasional dumba$$, but I'm trying....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Dark Helmet (profile), 29 Jan 2010 @ 1:13pm
  
  Re:
  "Bravo Trails. Bravo. Class act. Myself? I still prefer calling out the occasional dumba$$, but I'm trying...."
  
  Yeah, you know, I've been REALLY off my game lately too.
  
  Quick, somebody say something stupid!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2010 @ 2:33pm
    
    Re: Re:
    How about something ironic instead of stupid?
    
    Completely true: I was talking to a complete stranger from Edwards, WA yesterday during happy hour and they, out of nowhere, mentioned that the guy who owned Mercer Island in the early 1900s became wealthy by running the northwest's largest cathouse for the loggers.
    
    Thanks, Techdirt for the crazy irony.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Disappointed, 29 Jan 2010 @ 12:34pm

I feel cheated; the most I ever got out of an MS event was a year old software product that was not selling well...

I need to pay closer attention to the next invitation form next time, make sure that I fill in the Hooker quantity preference boxes...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 10 Feb 2010 @ 8:31pm
  
  Re:
  It's all about how you fill out the profile. Select the largest amount of revenue and employees, and check off every option they have for product usage. Then you get the drugs and hookers. If you go with "10-100 employees", you get Visio and a box lunch...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rooker, 29 Jan 2010 @ 3:54pm

Uh Huh
I'd buy a bridge from a guy in a dark alley before I believe this story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2010 @ 5:24pm

If M$ is doing this they deserve all the crap that they are going to get for this story. It sure is stupid to drop a contract with someone not willing to participate in illicit activities because a) they know you are funding illicit activities, b) they have a good reason to want revenge, c) other participants will wonder what M$ is doing with the pictures.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Jan 2010 @ 1:21am

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Jan 2010 @ 1:22am

D\\am\n\\it!!\!!!!!!!!!\\\\!\\\\\\\\\\\
\
\
\
\
\\\\M\A\K\E\ \I\T\ \S\T\OP\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 2 May 2010 @ 2:41am

Even better if you turn it all down and get your Macbook Pro fixed for free.

I kinda like Steve Jobs, even if he's completely detached from reality. Maybe he'll have that guy who found the 4G iPhone on stage with him to introduce it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]