Reporter, TV Execs (Maybe?) Confused Over Lost Fans Choosing Not To Watch Leaked Episode
from the and-this-explains-everything dept
There's an unintentionally hilarious article over at Reuters claiming that TV execs are positively perplexed over the fact that many fans of the TV show Lost are purposely ignoring a leaked new episode of the show, preferring to wait until its aired on TV. Of course, the article doesn't actually quote any confused TV execs. Instead, it quotes one TV exec at ABC who does seem to understand why fans don't want to watch it until it airs on TV.But, of course, that doesn't play into the media narrative that fans are greedy downloaders who will just get anything as fast as possible when put online. So, instead, the report has to make it out like it's a "surprise." Perhaps only to those who haven't bothered paying attention to what fans actually want. This, by the way, was why there are better ways to respond to movie/TV show leaks than breaking out the lawyers.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: culture, fans, file sharing, lost, unauthorized
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I think the key quote in all of this is:
"Why spoil it now?" wrote one fan with the moniker MyWhiteNoise. "I'd rather watch it in hi-def and surround sound than ruin the surprise and watch some (low-quality) video."
I think the results might be different if the leaked video was a 1080p with high quality sound, rather than a low end version.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yeah, if only we were allowed to share it. I'll have to wait till the 5th February before I can watch it, by which time I can probably expect it to have been spoiled anyway. Sadly, Americans aren't afraid of spamming some message boards with spoilers for the rest of the world to see once they've had the chance to see a program.
The "shared experience" is a bullshit creation of the last millennium and has no place in today's market. Some people will choose to watch the pirated copy, some will wait for the broadcast. Others will download a copy so they can watch it without the ads (or before their country's premiere, which may be months away), others will wait even longer so that they can watch the whole season on DVD without ads and without the wait between episodes. The customers are going to choose their preferred method with or without ABC's blessing.
"I think the results might be different if the leaked video was a 1080p with high quality sound, rather than a low end version."
...which will be available to everybody outside of the US, 2 seconds after the episode finishes airing. As ever, artificial scarcity is not a solution to the "problem" of "piracy".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
In the "on demand" universe, that connection is lost (no pun intended), which in many ways lowers the value of the entertainment to all. It's too bad that in the headlong rush of technology, we lose what often made things special to start with.
Everyone wonders why American Idol and such do so well... it's because you can't pirate a live performance, you can't P2P a shared experience. They are special because of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Please provide evidence that this is why they do so well, instead of mere speculation. Oh, and your alleged psychic abilities does not constitute evidence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I also love the fact that your opening paragraph was basically "screw everyone outside the US", even though the technology certainly exists to allow everybody the same experience if ABC chose to offer it.
"Everyone wonders why American Idol and such do so well... it's because you can't pirate a live performance, you can't P2P a shared experience."
Can't be pirated? Explain this:
http://www.google.com/search?q=american+idol+torrent
Close to a million hits. Maybe you're referring to the muppets who spend money to phone into an easily rigged voting system during the broadcast. However, I don't see how somebody who decides to DVR the broadcast and watch it later is getting a "lesser" experience unless they're one of the said muppets, in which case they will choose the live experience, just as someone not interesting in phoning in may choose to watch later.
Besides which, you've just confirmed one of the things that you constantly argue against. The solution to "piracy" is not to act like King Canute and try to stop it, but rather to offer extra value that the "pirated" versions cannot provide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
How many people will watch the Super Bowl? How many will watch a torrent of it 6 months from now? It's stale bread.
Oh, as for your "million hits", you only have to go a few pages to find things that aren't torrents at all, just people trying to suck up Google traffic with keywords. In fact, by putting America Idol Torrent into the comments of this page, we have just moved it to 991,001 results, congrats!
Sorry Paul, but you are losing on this one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"Besides which, you've just confirmed one of the things that you constantly argue against. The solution to "piracy" is not to act like King Canute and try to stop it, but rather to offer extra value that the "pirated" versions cannot provide."
The 'live' bit being the extra value..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"It's the difference in theory between seeing a live concert and watching a concert video."
Yet, CDs and DVDs of live concerts sell. Just because it's not the most popular option, that doesn't mean there's no market. People who cannot catch the show live for whatever reason, be it work, TV schedule, location or simple lack of interest, will record it to view later or download it if they forgot to record it.
As for things like the Super Bowl - http://www.amazon.com/NFL-Super-Bowl-I-XL-Collectors/dp/B000EU1Q18 - people do quite clearly watch old games. As ever, you make the classic mistake of assuming thsat just because *you* prefer something a particular way, that's how everybody wants it. "Pirates" are simply addressing the parts of the market that idiots like you refuse to service.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
No, sorry Paul, but you miss it. You can torrent the resulting show, but you cannot torrent LIVE. Your torrent file isn't the live event, it's a recording of the event. It's the difference between attending a live event and watching a video of a live event at a later date.
CD's and DVDs of live shows sell well, mostly because the vast majority of fans never actually get to see their favorite bands in concert.
As ever, you make the classic mistake of assuming thsat just because *you* prefer something a particular way, that's how everybody wants it.
Nope, I am making the very good assumption that the 25 or 30 million people who tune in are a significantly larger market than will re-watch it later. There is a market there (the NFL knows it and markets to it), but that market isn't a drop on the live market at all. It isn't that I prefer it one way or the other (the superbowl usually plays at chinese new year, and I am usually out of the country), but rather that I can look at the basic numbers and know who wants what.
If you want to focus on small markets, so be it. But the vast majority of the market isn't in watching days old Superbowl games, it's in watching it live.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anti-Mike thinks dirt is dry water.
Man, seriously.
You lost *all* credibility when you pulled out your 'Dirt is dry water.' analogy. I mean, wow...
You trying to sound like you know shit about anything is just LOL whatever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
That's true for "live broadcast", not live performances, and not so for TV shows and Movies. If I missed a live broadcast, I would rather just watch the highlights/summary after the fact instead of sit through the whole thing which is usually 90% crap.
If your "stale bread" has no value, explain the compilation albums, DVD releases, movie rentals, file-sharing popularity, all are "after the fact".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
There is no need for a torrent when you had access to the original material, just record it, as fair use allows!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You mean, as the law allows after the entertainment industry was dragged kicking and screaming into the modern world?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You can torrent AI after the fact, but no matter what you do, it's after the fact. It's past it's due date already at that point, like buying stale bread.
Hmm. It's almost like things that are actually scarce have more value. A live performance has more value than a recorded one. That's a great point, I'm surprised no one here has ever picked up on that.
The stale bread comment is priceless too. A band has a concert, then sells recordings of the concert. And you wonder why the public views paying for that as buying stale bread?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you what you think it means.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: hypocrite much ?
I remember you, not too ago, chastising some other poster for their obvious American centric bias. And yet here you are doing the same exact thing. So, I guess it depends upon whether your agenda is helped or not by being cognisant of the rest of the world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
So it's the fans fault for not living in the US that their experience will be spoiled and can't deliver any input in the conversation around the shows?
Are you delusional?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I live in the US. You know what never gets discussed around the watercooler in my workplace? Anything on television. I don't think anyone feels terribly deprived, despite our "loss."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
If talking about last night's television show is special and worthwhile, I'm left wondering what are the banal and worthless aspects of our culture? I'm a bit more optimistic - I think we have enough valuable things to do that the loss of talking about TV shows needn't be mourned.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It is about the shared cultural experience. It's why I prefer listening to the radio in the car over listening to my iPhone. That's why most people still pay $10+/person to see movies in a theater when frequently downloads are available and people have home theaters.
That's true value.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Dunno, guess so - I shut down cable completely. Been a few months and counting and I don't regret it one little bit. I was just done paying $90.00 a month to watch TV that was 50% advertisements anyway. That's silly.
NetFlix and buying movies is good enough. And no, I don't torrent them. I prefer a collection of originals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
People waited long.
But I found such wonderful things in web-series lately, I don't think it will be a great loss.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: People waited long.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: People waited long.
FYI, the video streams of ABC.com are closed for non-US citizens. Of course there are ways around it, but that's just as illegal as downloading it off of a torrent server and can cause a lot of headaches that you don't want.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: People waited long.
What's illegal about a proxy?
Although - I could see some of those proxies out there giving you a virus..
But mostly - why the heck do they block it if you are outside the U.S.???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: People waited long.
Why else?
Licensing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: People waited long.
Licensing.
Licensing is the tool, greed is the motivation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: People waited long.
It's licensing from the content creators that prevents them from streaming the content outside of the U.S. because ABC doesn't have the rights for that type of distribution.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: People waited long.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or...
Meh, no such luck I'm affraid LoL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sort of like a guy who just spouts out the first thing that comes into his mind on a message board rather than taking the time to write something thoughtful that is worth reading?
I would say that people waiting to see the first episode are doing so for many different reasons. Some might just want to make sure that everything is right, that no scenes are missing or altered. Some might care about sound or video quality (although I doubt there are many of them). Some might just have it in their head that the premiere is tonight at 8 o'clock or whenever and have made plans accordingly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That is the point my friend. It doesn't matter when it is available "on demand" or "on torrent" in the future, there is only one time when it becomes real, the original, the premiere, and that is (insert date and time here). People will chat about it for a couple of days after, and then it is gone. Like a wave, it is over.
Yes, you can watch pictures of the wave and enjoy it in your own way, but it isn't the same as seeing it, chatting with your friends about it after (or even as it is playing, as some do online). It is a shared experience, one of the many things that makes our lives enjoyable, and something that is lost (still no pun intended) if there is no longer a time and place to enjoy that experience.
In many ways, it is the difference between seeing a new movie on debut night with some friends in a crowded theater, and watching it at home 12 months later by yourself. The experience is different, it certainly isn't shared.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Those people that pirate TV/Films have no desire to take part in the shared experience and thus were unlikely to pay for the experience in the first place. Those that want the shared experience will go to the cinema, buy the sky/cable subscription and watch it as it comes out.
The chances are good that a number of those that pirated the film/TV show will feel sad they missed out on the shared experience and will go to the cinema or buy that sky/cable subscription so they can join in next time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You are now defending the position that Mike has held for some time now, that piracy isn't bad, it's free promotion and true fans want the "extra" experience.
What happens when Mike and TAM agree?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Or, you know, general puzzlement by the readers...
either way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Contest
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Contest
Pointless experiment done "because we can" gone wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Contest
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Contest
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
pirating live events
You don't have to download to be a pirate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
will you wait a year?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nope
Not illegal. At least, not in the USA. There is no law, and nothing in copyright, that says "you cant partake of a stream of video offered by the rights holder if you live in such-and-such country."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We're smarter than that
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: We're smarter than that
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why i watch LOST when it airs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]