Iran Says No To Gmail; Yes To 'We Spy On You' Email
from the well-that's-comforting dept
Given reports that Iran is potentially handing out death sentences to bloggers whose content the Iranian gov't dislikes, you would think that a secure and private means of communication is important for many people in that country. And apparently the Iranian government realizes this and doesn't like it. So it's decided to try to pull the plug on Gmail, and instead roll out a "national email service." Of course, that just means an email service that the government has full access to, which I'm sure doesn't fool anyone. However, it does make you wonder if Iran thinks it can possibly block all other types of email beyond just Gmail (and I'm sure plenty of folks in Iran can quickly figure out how to get around the blocks).
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Counter-Censorship Operations
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Counter-Censorship Operations
We must learn that we do not run the planet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Counter-Censorship Operations
What company are accusing of that? Or was that just a straw man argument?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Counter-Censorship Operations
"I wonder if Google has a team dedicated to counter-censorship? Perhaps they could throw resources at it that were previously dedicated towards Google China."
I hope this helps you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Counter-Censorship Operations
It would be more helpful if you answered the question.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Counter-Censorship Operations
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Counter-Censorship Operations
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Counter-Censorship Operations
Kind of like when I say that I don't think that you should be allowed to rape any more little kids? Yeah, I understand how that kind of insinuation works.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Counter-Censorship Operations
That came out of nowhere. Look I understand both sentiments. One sentiment is that it's immoral to allow censorship to occur. The other sentiment is that it's immoral to interfere with a country's local laws unless you live in that country or have a major stake in it, because if you're not a local you might not know best.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Counter-Censorship Operations
That came out of nowhere.
Nobody said that Epsyle was actually raping little kids, just that he shouldn't be allowed to. Nobody should. Who can argue with that?
Yeah, the example was probably a little extreme. The point was that someone was trying to insinuate that maybe Google was doing something (that it isn't) without coming right out and saying it by and that's a cheap shot.
Google isn't trying to interfere in the internal affairs of either China or Iran. On the contrary, if Google were to take sides and assist the groups currently running those countries in their censorship programs to suppress other groups then they *would* be getting involved.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Simple Answer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Counter-Censorship Operations
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Counter-Censorship Operations
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Counter-Censorship Operations
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, really it goes from corporate spy to government spy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well, really it goes from corporate spy to government spy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well, really it goes from corporate spy to government spy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Solutions already exist.
But I think Iran already did this once, didn't they tried to make another e-mail already that nobody used?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
upon penalty of death
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Encryption
There are several easy-to-use tools for this, such as Flexcrypt (www.flexcrypt.com)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Encryption
There are several easy-to-use tools for this, such as Flexcrypt (www.flexcrypt.com)
Proprietary encryption products complete with back doors?
Better go with open source products instead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Encryption
We all live in a dictatorship of some sort.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Encryption
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Iran can try whatever they like, but
-John Gilmore
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Iran can try whatever they like, but
"by Anonymous Coward
"The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it."
-John Gilmore
"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Iran? Isn't that some kind of disease?
Netted out, who cares what they do to their own people? If they're so cowardly and impotent to have tolerated and condoned this for decades, they quite simply deserve their situation. Were they all to disappear from the earth overnight, I doubt they'd be missed by anyone, anywhere, ever. And, the oil would now become cause for their neighbors to start killing each other over it in ever larger numbers. All in all, not a bad possible outcome. Let the games begin.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Compromised news outlet (like this website) keep pushing these insane news only to fabricate Iran hate idiots that will say YES to another war based on lies.
If only people could do a complete follow up before they make their mind if they hate, love, dislike, or whatever someone, some place, some organization, etc. I'm so sick of this Iran news that I care not to follow up no more. But sure thing I can see a fabrication when I see one.
There is no action, without reaction! What I think it happened is that Iran's gov probably asked Google for some info, and they refused to share, hence the ban.
Chinese ppl are a bit more intelligent and prepare to handle Google's nasty practices.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: (AC-#24)
WTF!?
Where the hell did that come from?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
but
we breaking this wall
we will have gmail/Buzz/facebook/twitter/youtube/....
[url=http://forum.majidonline.com/showthread.php?t=13942 5]Iranian Come On[/url]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]