The Godfather of Energy Efficiency Gets A Unit

from the offers-you-can't-refuse dept

A group of scientists has proposed a unit of energy efficiency to be named after Arthur Rosenfeld. The Rosenfeld unit will be defined as the electricity savings of 3 billion kilowatt-hours per year -- an amount that is roughly equal to the annual production of a 500 megawatt coal-fired power plant. This efficiency unit is dedicated to Rosenfeld's long career in energy analysis and energy standards which have resulted in billions of dollars in energy savings. While this somewhat esoteric unit may not catch on as a mainstream concept, Rosenfeld also has the Rosenfeld Effect named after him (which describes the phenomenon that California's electricity use per capita has remained relatively constant from 1973 to 2006 while that figure has risen more than 50% for the rest of the US). Additionally, there's also Rosenfeld's Law which states that the energy required to generate one dollar of GDP has decreased by about one percent per year since 1845.
From 1845 to the present, the amount of energy required to produce the same amount of gross national product has steadily decreased at the rate of about 1 percent per year. This is not quite as spectacular as Moore's Law of integrated circuits, but it has been tested over a longer period of time. One percent per year yields a factor of 2.7 when compounded over 100 years. It took 56 BTUs (59,000 joules) of energy consumption to produce one (1992) dollar of GDP in 1845. By 1998, the same dollar required only 12.5 BTUs (13,200 joules).
Rosenfeld conducted much of his research work in California, and U.S. Secretary of Energy Stephen Chu has called Rosenfeld a hero of his. Now, if only the beneficial effects of energy efficiency could spread beyond California and reduce the Rosenfeld Effect.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 11 Mar 2010 @ 10:21am

    heh.. what's the difference?

    what's the difference between a 500 MW "coal-fired" power plant and a 500 MW power plant that isn't coal-fired?

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.