Careful What You Wish For: Greater IP Enforcement In China Being Used Against Foreign Companies...
from the you-asked-for-it... dept
Supporters of stronger intellectual property laws in other countries ought to be careful what they ask for... they just might get it, and then discover they didn't really want it after all. For example, for many, many years, US companies have been screaming loudly about how the US should pressure China to be more respectful of intellectual property. China, for example, regularly makes the "priority watch list" of the USTR's "Special 301" report, which is effectively a catalog of what countries US companies are complaining most about. However, China has suddenly taken an interest in intellectual property in the last few years, and it doesn't seem to be turning out quite like US companies expected.First, a few years back, we wrote about a high profile counterfeit DVD bust in China, where the "culprit" was actually a rich American. Then, we noticed in 2008 that China was starting to talk about China cracking down on video game piracy, but only when it concerned others copying China's video games. Finally, late last year, we noted that a French company had lost a patent lawsuit in China.
It turns out that was just the beginning. Joe Mullin points us to a story about how there have been a series of recent patent and trademark rulings in Chinese courts all of which appear to be going against large multinational companies and in favor of Chinese companies.
Of course, this isn't a surprise at all. Various studies have shown that greater copyright, patent and trademark protections tend to follow a period of great innovation, when the companies that did that innovation look to protect their position from upstarts elsewhere. In other words, it acts in the exact opposite manner as it's supposed to. It's not an incentive to innovate, but a tool used to stop competition and innovation from others. The situation in China is playing out exactly according to that formula. The country is growing into a bigger believer in intellectual property laws -- but only for the sake of using it to protect against foreigners -- which, we assume, is not what US companies wanted, but which they should have expected if they ever bothered to look at the actual history of stronger intellectual property laws.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: china, copyright, intellectual property, piracy, video games
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thank you, ocident
Once China becomes the leading superpower again, we will all be suffering at their newly acquired taste for insane IP protectionism.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When China gets on the IP bandwagon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: east texaschun
But on another matter, same article, why do we have an "IP Attache'?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
haha on americans
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hooray?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Calling for better arguments against Patents
The first statement is blindingly obvious. The innovations allow the inventors to apply for patents. This then doesn't actually imply the second statement.
What would be useful to see was that innovation drops after a large swathe of patents.
I know patents are abused, but the arguments put in the last paragraph are pretty poor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Calling for better arguments against Patents
I don't have a lot of background in that, so I can't verify it in a broad sense. But it's certainly true of software patents at the very least.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Calling for better arguments against Patents
[ link to this | view in chronology ]