Too Little Too Late: Universal Music Finally Realizes That Maybe CDs Were Too Expensive

from the you're-about-a-decade-behind dept

Fri, Mar 19th 2010 2:07pm — Mike Masnick

David Herron alerts us to the news that it's finally occurred to the brain trust at Universal Music that, perhaps, CD prices were too high. They've introduced a "new pricing structure," which effectively means they've lowered the suggested retail prices on many CDs to between $6 and $10. Amusingly, the article quotes an anonymous person at a competitor who doesn't like this at all:

"Why does Universal feel the need to get below $10?"

Uh, perhaps because the market is shrinking because people find it too expensive otherwise. Either way, this move seems like way too little, way too late. Doing this in the late 90s might have been a start, but this isn't going to get people who have stopped buying CDs back into a plastic disc fix.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cds, prices
Companies: universal music

45 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

crade (profile), 19 Mar 2010 @ 2:09pm

Holy crap, competition?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Hephaestus (profile), 19 Mar 2010 @ 5:40pm
  
  Re:
  What does this mean? are Universal Tunes on iTunes about to drop to fiddy cent (0.5 USD) a piece? Will am Amiee street type pricing model emerge out of the fray of this "felony intervention with a business model"? Will universal find that they are selling more than 5 times as many downloads at 50 cents as before and making more money to boot?
  
  I have one thing to say ... wow ... universal might just stand a chance. Whats next dropping RIAA to gain public support.
  
  definition - felony intervention with a business model - competition.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Mar 2010 @ 2:35pm

Hold on... I haven't bought a CD in years, but at $6, I might actually 'sleep with the enemy' and get a disk I might really like...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Mar 2010 @ 2:35pm

I stopped buying CDs because of the label's immoral behavior, and will only resume if they fix that. $6-10 dollars is still $6-10 dollars they will spend on suing teenagers and grandmothers, publishing bogus reports, and paying politicians to pass draconian legislation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
weneedhelp (profile), 19 Mar 2010 @ 2:35pm

6 bucks is a start
My lunches cost about that much. I would buy CD's at that cost. Considering most CD's will have at least 6 songs on them, less than a buck a track...cmon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nastybutler77 (profile), 19 Mar 2010 @ 2:38pm

Almost there
If I could get new albums by big name artists for $5-$6 I'd start buying a whole lot more music. I like having the physical disk and liner notes, but not for $12-$15 a pop. Even ten dollars will only get me to buy a few of my favorite artist's discs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
weneedhelp (profile), 19 Mar 2010 @ 2:39pm

by Anonymous Coward(s)
Hold on... I haven't bought a CD in years, but at $6, I might actually 'sleep with the enemy' and get a disk I might really like...

or
I stopped buying CDs because of the label's immoral behavior, and will only resume if they fix that. $6-10 dollars is still $6-10 dollars they will spend on suing teenagers and grandmothers, publishing bogus reports, and paying politicians to pass draconian legislation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Mar 2010 @ 2:52pm
  
  Re: by Anonymous Coward(s)
  What the hell is your point?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Mar 2010 @ 3:49pm
    
    Re: Re: by Anonymous Coward(s)
    Anonymous Coward believes that weneedhelp believes that Anonymous Cowards are all the same.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Mar 2010 @ 4:49pm
    
    Re: Re: by Anonymous Coward(s)
    that he won't buy CD's until the record labels fix their immoral behavior.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
weneedhelp (profile), 19 Mar 2010 @ 2:51pm

They just dont get it:
We are happy to see that a major music vendor has made a decision to lower his price substantially, because it's what the customer wants today if we are going to see a viable CD business," Trans World Entertainment CEO Bob Higgins said.

"viable CD business" Poor Poor Bobby. Dont they see that the plastic disk is going the route of the 8-track, LP, and cassette?

:(Quiet playing of taps in the background):
Hey Bob, the future of your industry will become more promotion, and touring, hence a production company. Giving away music for free to promote the band and get ppl into shows. Thats where the money is. That is where the future is going.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sehlat (profile), 19 Mar 2010 @ 2:54pm

Granddad? What's a CD?
[disbelieving gasp]You mean people used to buy their music on PLASTIC?

Yep, and they had to drive to stores. Uphill. Through the snow. Both ways.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Mar 2010 @ 4:50pm
  
  Re: Granddad? What's a CD?
  In the hot snow.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 22 Mar 2010 @ 6:17am
  
  Re: Granddad? What's a CD?
  How is it uphill both ways!?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - MattP, 22 Mar 2010 @ 8:40am
    
    Re: Re: Granddad? What's a CD?
    /sigh
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
milrtime83 (profile), 19 Mar 2010 @ 3:05pm

That $6-10 range means that any new stuff from popular artists that most people are looking to buy will be $9 or $10.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fushta, 19 Mar 2010 @ 3:05pm

CD v iTunes
The typical album on iTunes is what, $9.90? Is the same album is only $6.00 on plastic, I still wouldn't buy it.

I would never pay more for a digital format than physical. It just doesn't make sense. Same for eBooks that cost $10, but I can buy the paperback for $2.00 at half-priced books.

Regular MP3 files should be $0.25 and lossless $0.50, max.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Marcus Carab (profile), 19 Mar 2010 @ 3:34pm
  
  Re: CD v iTunes
  Agreed. I would have been psyched about this if it was 1997, but in 2010 my first and only response is: "umm, okay, so when are you going to stop charging me $10 for digital albums?"
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
zellamayzao, 19 Mar 2010 @ 3:08pm

Its a start
Ill give them that, but I think it might be too little too late like stated in the article. Thought I dunno there have been some artists I like here lately to release cds that I have downloaded and would actually like to purchase them but the 15$(+) price tags deterred me. If there are any good artists left under the scope of Universals label coverage maybe I might pick up a few of those discs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
crade (profile), 19 Mar 2010 @ 3:53pm

You guys are missing the point.. One of the record labels is doing something that the others don't want in an attempt to *entice customers*.. They are trying *competing* as a means of making money! Sure they aren't doing it well, but we have to write this day on the damn calendar!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Marcus Carab (profile), 19 Mar 2010 @ 3:58pm
  
  Re:
  Hmm... interesting point. Maybe a silly CD price-war will be what ultimately spurs the labels into finally embracing cheap digital distribution.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Mar 2010 @ 4:29pm
    
    Re: Re:
    If you look at how the recording industry has behaved for the past decade, doubt it.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jamie, 19 Mar 2010 @ 7:20pm
  
  That was the point for me, too
  It is interesting that the anonymous whiner essentially admitted the fact that we've all known: that the price point of CDs were arbitrarily high, and that this is a cartel defection that offends them.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
NAMELESS.ONE, 19 Mar 2010 @ 4:24pm

500 songs on a single cdr
AAC style
you want to what me for how much ?
10-15 songs HUH?
FUCK YOU

thats the real true response
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NAMELESS.ONE, 19 Mar 2010 @ 4:26pm

adlib
cost of YOUR sanity PRICELESS

cost to me
25cents blank plus 26.7 cents to the copyright collective
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rich, 19 Mar 2010 @ 4:29pm

You can still buy CDs?
Seriously, where do you even go these days to buy a CD? Target's and Costco's of the world, I guess?

I spent the better part of my late teens and early 20s in Tower Records, pouring thru their offerings looking for the ones that were on sale for $11.99 or less. Or better yet, I hit just about any used CD store I could find because prices were so ridiculous. Had they done this back in the 90's, my CD collection would probably be about 4 times the size it is now. I'd still be buying them more than likely. Now? Who can be bothered to go to the store to buy a CD? Maybe if I'm already there for other stuff.

Even now, though, $10 for a digital album is too high, and I find myself still searching for the "deals." Amazon music is great in that respect; they have a daily deal, and also always have stuff for $5 and under...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Rob.Etler (profile), 23 Mar 2010 @ 2:07pm
  
  Re: You can still buy CDs?
  I like to buy CD's because I enjoy the artwork and I like having an original disc. But not for $18.99 (in 2001 dollars, courtesy of Sam Goody's). That's why i wait a few years until they're going for under a buck on Amazon, then swipe them up for about $3.00 with shipping.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brooke, 19 Mar 2010 @ 4:50pm

I wish could buy CDs for $15
Just be thankful that you don't live in Australia for a new release CD its $30 sometimes even $40. I have to wait for CDs to be in the bargain bin before they get to $10-15, that’s if they even stock the CDs I want to buy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anthony, 19 Mar 2010 @ 6:49pm
  
  Re: I wish could buy CDs for $15
  Brooke one thing you need to take into account between Australia & the US is the amount of money people are paid. In Australia the people serving youat the shops are paid at least $16 an hour (some pay up to $20 an hour). In the US they're paid $10 an hour. Also the average wage in Australia is AUS$25,000 a year more than it is in the US. Also new release CDs at any store not owned by Brazin are around $25 each (check out the likes of Big W & K-Mart next time). Taking into account the currency rates and that's around US$21 for the album, which on percentage of income is the similar as the US.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Brooke, 20 Mar 2010 @ 12:01am
    
    Re: Re: I wish could buy CDs for $15
    That’s a good point but there’s a lot of ppl who get way less than that. Students and pensioners are 2 groups that defiantly don’t get anywhere near that much. Big W and K-mart don’t stock any of the music I listen to lol. Those stores only stock generally mainstream music. If you’re like me and listen to metal your choices severely limited.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
alternatives(), 19 Mar 2010 @ 5:34pm

Why should the backers of the DMCA get rewarded
These "people" have decided to use changes in the "law" to "protect" their business model. (not to mention what was shown in the CD price fixing trial)

I see no reason to reward their past behavior with my vote of money.

At the point where I decided to not reward them with my money I changed my habits. Now my habits no longer include what they have to offer.

My suggestion is that others follow, because without the "votes" of your money these "people" can't go to congress and get more screw the consumer laws.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chris Pratt, 19 Mar 2010 @ 5:38pm

Good for us, bad for music industry
I think they're going to end up shooting themselves in the foot with this. People aren't buying CDs not because they're too expensive (at least not only because). They're not buying them because they're inconvenient. Digital music is the standard now; even you buy a CD, you're just going to go home and rip it to your computer.

However, places like iTunes are going to have a hard time justifying $12.99 for a digital album when you can purchase the same thing for $6-10 bucks in a brick-and-mortar. I think the end result will be that the music industry will drive down the price of music across the board.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jamie, 19 Mar 2010 @ 7:25pm
  
  Re: Good for us, bad for music industry
  Wait, you mean an artitrary price point that eventually falters because consumers are unwilling to buy the product at that price might have to change? That the strategy of buying legislation to support a broken business model fails when consumers realize that they simply don't care any more?
  
  That the price-point for a shiney disk was being maintained by legal engineering, not market reality, and that the interests of the RIAA and the artists it ostensibly serves are not perfectly aligned, unless you're U2 or Metallica?
  
  It is almost as if economics applied to music, or something!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 20 Mar 2010 @ 1:16am
  
  Re: Good for us, bad for music industry
  I disagree with your first point. There's still a large army of Luddites out there who haven't worked out that digital music exists or how to use it, so lower prices might make them pick up more CDs. A lower base price also makes CDs more of an impulse item - something to grab on a whim when checking out at Wal Mart or Target, or maybe you'll pick up 2-3 CDs when you used to only grab one. Although few people still go to record shops (those that still exist, anyway), most will end up in another kind of retailer that just happens to sell CDs...
  
  As for your second point, well I hope this happens but I doubt it. The labels will try to hold on to the higher pricing they fought so hard for with iTunes, and they'll probably be less willing to give up their premium single track price in favour of a lower album price, even if that makes more sense.
  
  I personally predict that this will bump up the sales of CDs temporarily, but time will tell whether this translates into greater profits for Universal, whether others will follow suit, or whether it trickles down to the digital market. I predict a long, frustrating wait, as ever.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Vincent Clement, 20 Mar 2010 @ 8:45pm
    
    Re: Re: Good for us, bad for music industry
    That CD section at Walmart and Target gets smaller every year. When I visited a Target about a month ago, the CD section consisted of an aisle or two in the electronics section and mostly consisted of CDs released over the past two years. Only a few artists had older selections.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
DanVan (profile), 19 Mar 2010 @ 7:35pm

It is funny yet sad to see this. It shows how utterly out-of-touch they are with reality

People aren't staying away from CD's because of the price, they just prefer the ease of downloading, the price of d/l'ing a few songs, and they generally love the mp3 players rather than a large, clunky CD player
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Mar 2010 @ 8:19pm
  
  Re:
  The era of the shiny plastic disc is over.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jamie, 19 Mar 2010 @ 9:44pm
  
  Can you illustrate that as a testable proposition?
  For instance, can you predict a price-point at which CDs would become preferable to consumers again?
  
  Just to stake out my own position, I think that if RIAA distributed CDs at about the price of production, I think people would happily accept them.
  
  Of course, that would require RIAA to actually promote artist's interests, and rethink how they do business.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Allen Harkleroad (profile), 20 Mar 2010 @ 1:31am

CD Prices
I still prefer Music CD's over MP3's. CD's are more durable than digital formats. Less worry about hard drives failing. Call me backwards, but then again that's me...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- vivaelamor (profile), 20 Mar 2010 @ 2:53am
  
  Re: CD Prices
  "I still prefer Music CD's over MP3's. CD's are more durable than digital formats. Less worry about hard drives failing. Call me backwards, but then again that's me..."
  
  One day computers will come with data contingency plans as standard. Unfortunately, they will likely be piss poor web based offerings that no informed user would trust with their shopping list. NAS boxes are great but for those stuck on Windows, the software to do backups is largely expensive or cumbersome. Maybe Windows will eventually grow up to be a real operating system with such basic utilities as SSH and rsync.
  
  Actually, there is at least one good backup program for Windows called Cobian Backup, but it still lacks support for decent network protocols such as SSH.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Etch, 21 Mar 2010 @ 7:38am
  
  Re: CD Prices
  Allen said: "I still prefer Music CD's over MP3's. CD's are more durable than digital formats. Less worry about hard drives failing. Call me backwards, but then again that's me..."
  
  I don't wanna call your comment ridiculous.. but it really is ridiculous! My BIGGEST issue with CDs is scratches and skipping! The only CD that lived with me for more than 4 years before it started skipping was a CD that I never took out of its plastic wrapping in the first place!
  
  I swear I remember owning a CD for a band named Opeth that I loved, I literally never took the CD out of my CD player for close to 6 months, and by the 7th month it started skipping.. I took it out to look for dust and found it all scratched up!
  How did a CD get scratched up just by playing it repeatedly and never taking it out of the player? I don't know, but that is the point when I completely gave up on CDs. They are a terrible medium and its about time they DIE!
  
  As for Hard Drive failures.. I back everything on my PC to an external drive anyways, and I usually end up upgrading my PC before my HDs expire, so I never faced they issue. Besides, if you bought your music digitally, you can re-download them from the site you bought it from if you still have your login information! Can't do the same with CDs.
  
  Digital formats are 100x more durable than physical CDs, and that's a fact. With Blu-ray Discs they fixed that problem, (durable anti-scratch surfaces) and that is why I'm a huge fan of Blu-ray Discs, even though eventually i would also prefer Digital Formats. But for now, I've never owned a Blu-ray Disc that failed on me or got scratched!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
btrussell (profile), 20 Mar 2010 @ 6:12am

Since a CD usually only has one song on it worth anything, $6-10 is still wayyy more expensive than iTunes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Mar 2010 @ 9:23am

You are not entitled to my money.
This story warms my heart. It shows that a decade of effort may be starting to pay off finally. Basic economics 101 says they don't have a choice really, and all we need to do is continue to be patient. To paraphrase from another commenter: I do not want to destroy the music industry. I do not want to destroy the recording industry either. I DO want to destroy the anti-consumer, anti-liberty parts of it though.

Having been repeatedly burnt by corporate greed and anti-consumer hatred over the years, I probably won't be supporting the industry by buying their albums at the newly lowered prices. I will however keep buying used CD's, which over time should also drop in price thanks to this plan of theirs. If they were to sincerely apologize to the world someday and admit they acted like a two year old having a temper tantrum, I might then reconsider my boycott. Not going to hold my breath on that though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Flakey, 21 Mar 2010 @ 9:34am

Storage
I agree with Allen Harkleroad about storage backup. Hard physical backups have saved the day more than once. No matter what you do at some point you will wind up reformatting Windows. Either a vicious virus or malware will make it necessary or the logs in Windows will get so big that the only way you'll get speed back is to reformat. Either way, what you had on the computer is then gone.

Now you can back up to harddrives but you run into the problem of most HDs having a 50,000 hour life span for the average. At some point they crater, taking your backup data with it.

The one sure thing that survives computer formats and data loss is external physical backup.

@Etch
The problem with cds and dvds is not scratches, it's providing proper care for them. You put them in cases, you handle them by the edges, and you always put them up when done; back in it's protective case. If you're still getting scratches then you have a faulty design in your player. I've cds and dvds that are going on 12 years without issue in use. They are always on hand when needed.

You don't need the net or anything else to get back up to speed. It's all at hand. Some of us are not so blessed to get decent internet speeds and depending on just getting the updates via internet is a painful process at best.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bob, 23 Mar 2010 @ 6:00pm

Go Ahead
Buy that disk and get a rootkit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]