Court Sorta Kinda Allows Marginally More Media Cross Ownership

from the yawn dept

Wed, Mar 24th 2010 6:51pm — Mike Masnick

For decades, the US has had certain "media cross-ownership" limits to prevent, for example, a single company from owning both a local broadcast network and a newspaper. These rules came about back when those two were basically the only source one could go to for local news. But, of course, that's not true any more (at all). Instead, you've got local media that is struggling, and perhaps it does make sense for them to not be forced into only playing in a single medium. So, for years the FCC has tried to loosen media ownership rules, leading to complaints from people who still don't seem to recognize that the internet is a pretty big competitor these days with the old media companies. In 2007, the FCC came up with a compromise that very marginally loosened media ownership rules: basically, in just the top 20 media markets, a newspaper could merge with a single radio or TV station but not if that TV station was one of the top 4 in the market. In other words, there was no way this minor loosening of the rules was going to lead to some feared situation of one company dominating the media landscape.

But, still, lots of people protested that suddenly all our news was going to come from Rupert Murdoch, and politicians looked to invalidate the rule while lawsuits were filed. A judge eventually banned putting the rules into effect, but an appeals court has now temporarily lifted the ban. While some are still complaining about this, the impact is likely to be negligible at best. As Editor & Publisher explains:

It's safe to say that Tuesday's Third Circuit action -- which could prove only a temporary lifting of the ban -- won't set off any buying binge among newspapers.

For one thing, nobody is going to lend newspapers money to buy media these days. That lesson's been learned until the next bubble comes around. And even if a newspaper had the jack to swing a deal, there's little point in spending it on the fourth-place -- or worse -- broadcast outlet in town.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: broadcasters, cross ownership, fcc, limits, media ownership, newspapers

8 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 24 Mar 2010 @ 7:09pm

What's a newspaper?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Mighty Buzzard, 24 Mar 2010 @ 8:52pm
  
  Re:
  Really good fire starting material. Not as cheap as a block of magnesium and flint but almost any convenience store carries newspapers and hardly any carry handy pieces of magnesium.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 24 Mar 2010 @ 9:21pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Did you know that Newspapers are great for cleaning glass/windows with some glass cleaner like Windex or Glass Plus? They can also be used to make paper airplanes as well and they're good if you have pet birds to put in their bird page or if you paint and want to use them to prevent your floor from getting paint on them.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 24 Mar 2010 @ 9:23pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Oh, and they can make decent fly swatters too I suppose.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 24 Mar 2010 @ 9:48pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        So the government might have to bail out a fire-burning, glass-cleaning, glorified flyswatter?
        
        I can do all of those things! Where's my money?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Mar 2010 @ 8:47pm

Poor Nbc
They would have gotten all the money "there's little point in spending it on the fourth-place -- or worse -- broadcast outlet in town." that was their bailout plan this whole time
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Technopolitical (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 3:49am

Cross ownership and Bulk ownership
Here in NYC,,, WCBS-TV news tells its views to catch up on the news on the radio at WINS all-news-radio .

Thing is there is also the all news WCBS-am-radio. Both all news radio stations have the same owner.

The two all news stations in the Big Apple have the same owner !?!? FCC regulations tend to be "random acts of managment".

But as talked about here at TechDirt last week , most print and internet news is wire service stuff anyway. While meanwhile on local radio and TV,,, anything non-local comes from networks -- that often pool their reporters anyway.

The news is most always the same as well ,, only the bylines are changed.

Want to be an informed citizen? Turn off the TV and Radio , burn the newspaer in the fireplace , and then use the internet to research out the issues for yourself from sites that do original reporting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hephaestus (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 8:44am

LOL ....
"won't set off any buying binge among newspapers."

That is something I really agree with. There should be a toxic asset of newspapers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]