While Newspapers Threaten To Ban Google News, This Journalist Begs To Get In
from the not-your-site dept
Lately, it seems that most media outlets are up in arms over Google and other news aggregators using their content. So, it's somewhat ironic to hear veteran journalist, Robert X. Cringely, complain that he has wanted to be included on Google News for years, but has had a hell of a time getting listed. He goes as far as to claim that he is on a "blacklist" of news sources that are denied from Google News. While this may seem like an exciting and interesting conspiracy theory, I'd have to wonder if Occam's razor applies here. Most likely, the Google News product managers have made some sort of algorithmic decision figure into whether or not a site is included in Google News, and simply put, Cringely.com did not fit the bill. No harm or ill will need be implied. Actually, after looking at Google News' technical requirements, it appears that Cringely's site does not meet Google's requirements of a numeric URL or news site map -- so, perhaps the first step would be to satisfy those requirements.That said, while Cringely does run an excellent site, he gives no reason why he should feel entitled to be included in Google News. After all, Google is incentivized to create the best news product that they can reasonably create, and if including a Cringely post would make Google News better for their users, then they would include it. After all, we are thrilled when Google News includes Techdirt on their site, but to this date, it is a mystery to us which posts are included -- and we don't feel entitled to that inclusion. That said, Cringely's ire is a reminder to the media outlets that there are plenty of sites that would love to take their place in news aggregators, if the opportunity should arise, so perhaps they should count their blessings for now.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: google news, journalism, robert x. cringely
Companies: google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Pseudonym?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pseudonym?
As far as "not interesting enough" or "doesn't meet criteria", if you RTA, Cringely claims that even at PBS, others had their columns indexed, but his mysteriously kept falling off the list. Don't know if that is true or not, but if this has been going on for years, maybe there is fire underneath the smoke.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Uh...
Truly, this would be about the least interesting conspiracy theory I can imagine. And that's coming from me, a person with an inherent love of such theories....
"Cringely's ire is a reminder to the media outlets that there are plenty of sites that would love to take their place in news aggregators"
That may be true, but they're going to have a hell of a time of it. The problem when you have a company with as much market percentage as Google is that you're less likely to be aware of both the mistakes that company is making as well as when competitors are doing it better. Not impossible, just less likely. And certainly there is nothing being done WRONG by Google in having that much of the market.
I just tend to get concerned when ANYONE is that dominant for so long.
And Dennis, not to sound like a complete dick, but walls of texts are annoying in the comments section; as an article itself it's nearly intolerable....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Uh...
In anycase, I've added a break to make it a bit more readable. Thanks for pointing that out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Read His Claims
You seem to be ignoring his claim that he has inside information that that is not the case, but rather that it is a case of personal animosity from some with power within Google. That's entirely different.
After all, Google is incentivized to create the best news product that they can reasonably create, and if including a Cringely post would make Google News better for their users, then they would include it.
If the decision were being made the best interest of Google itself in mind, that would be true. However, those with power in an organization sometimes put their personal interests ahead of the organization's (e.g.sexual harassment, embezzlement, etc.). If you don't think that ever happens, you need to go check the news.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"....During the 1970s I worked a lot in Africa where most of the countries weren’t that far from their colonial days. This meant that one country had an English bureaucracy, another German, etc. The bureaucracy of Libya was, and still is, I believe, very Italian in character. But the worst bureaucracy of these was the one that gave us the word itself — the French bureaucracy, which was almost insurmountable in its complexity and lack of humor. And Google, my friends, feels very French."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Revisionist
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google needs their wings trimmed.
Mike Masnick, you have the answer and ignore it. Cringely is a well established author who produces interesting material and that alone is good reason for him to be included.
Where Google is concerned it is foolish to not question their motives.
No single company should be allowed to gain the degree of dominance which Google has. It is very poor public policy.
Ronald J. Riley,
Speaking only on my own behalf.
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (810) 597-0194 - (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 8 pm EST.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Google needs their wings trimmed.
> of dominance which Google has. It is very poor public
> policy.
What kind of amazingly backward thinking is this? Nobody should be allowed to be this successful by serving their markets? So you want to make a regulatory environment that is actively set up to punish success simply for being successful? The current environment of punishing the abuse of your success doesn't always work the best, but God save us from Ronald J. Riley making the rules.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Google needs their wings trimmed.
Excessive market dominance has long been regulated for good reason.
Ronald J. Riley,
Speaking only on my own behalf.
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (810) 597-0194 - (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 8 pm EST.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Google needs their wings trimmed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Google needs their wings trimmed.
Er, that's an opinion, of course. One that may not be shared by a majority of others, or in this case, one private entity: Google.
"No single company should be allowed to gain the degree of dominance which Google has. It is very poor public policy."
I'm confused. Which part of a private company's success is a matter of public policy? I stated above that I get concerned when any corporation has as much of the market as Google does....but what does that have to do with government (public) policy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.newspaperintegrity.com/index
[ link to this | view in chronology ]