Rockstar Using 'Pirated' Copy Of Max Payne 2 On Steam To Remove DRM?
from the nicely-done dept
A couple years ago, we wrote about Ubisoft apparently using an internet crack to get around its own DRM after an Ubisoft patch screwed up the system and tried to require gamers, who had bought the downloaded version, to place the (non-existent) CD in the tray to prove that they had bought the game. It looks like Rockstar Games has now been caught doing something similar. BigKeithO points us to a forum discussion that suggests Rockstar is using a cracked version of its game Max Payne 2 on Steam, for the same reason (to get around the CD check). Apparently, in examining the code with a hex editor, someone discovered that the official Steam release is ascii tagged by the Scene release group Myth (which hasn't been around for many, many years). No one's quite sure what happened exactly, but the obvious suggestion is that Rockstar chose the easy way out in trying to remove the CD check DRM in the game to put it on Steam, and just found a cracked version online.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: drm, max payne, steam, video games
Companies: rockstar
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Hey!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hey!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hey!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is that legal?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is that legal?
So they guys who cracked it could go to jail, while they put it up on Stream.
Yeah, that seems right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Is that legal?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Is that legal?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Is that legal?
Arguable. The cracked version may very well be different (however slightly) from the original version.
Analogy: An artist claiming someone's work is derivative does not get to distribute that work, they can merely get an injunction.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Is that legal?
They know it's safe to do, otherwise they would not risk it, and all for a prehistoric game like Max Payne 2, c'mon you guys!..lol
Comon sense people! please!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Is that legal?
They know it's safe to do, otherwise they would not risk it, and all for a prehistoric game like Max Payne 2, c'mon you guys!..lol
Comon sense people! please!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Is that legal?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is that legal?
As the software was kracked by someone other than Rockstar I do not think it has run afoul of the DMCA.
But it certainly does illustrate the stupidity of DRM.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
His response? "I don't like it either, but the company says we need copy protection." And this is coming from a senior engineer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lol
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
to ubisoft
:P
hahahaha bet the former members of myth got a GREAT laugh over this.
anti circumvention laws would make this act they did illegal however.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I can, however, download every pirate collection ever produced. Your game wasn't on one of those collections? Nobody will ever play it again.
Seriously, this is what people have been saying all along - DRM does not work. One of the first things I used to do when installing a legal copy of a game with a CD check was to install the crack. Glad to see that the current publishers have noticed how stupid it is as well, even if they are using software that their industry has tried to jail people for creating.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Copyright infringement
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Copyright infringement
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Copyright of the cracker's code
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Copyright of the cracker's code
It isn't a copyright violation at all! Back to work, nothing to see here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Copyright of the cracker's code
As far as a copyright violation - the guys who cracked the game violated the EULA, whoever posted the cracked game likely violated Rockstar's copyright, and Rockstar re-posting it violated no copyright - because it was theirs in the first place.
I'm not sure what you are seeing. The news in this article is that although Rockstar complains about people violating their copyright and breaking their DRM, when it became convenient, they used the product of the copyright violation to their advantage.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Copyright of the cracker's code
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is going to hurt rockstar quite badly as it can be used as a defence strategy.....
"but your honor I was only cracking the software so that in future they can put it on steam when they go to download-only....see here's an example of where they did it before!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]