HTC Fires Back At Apple, Patent Nuclear Response Launched
from the and-here-we-go dept
With Apple and Nokia already locked in a patent nuclear war involving lawsuits filed back and forth and back and forth, it looks like the same thing may be happening now in the Apple-HTC dispute. The difference, of course, is that Apple initiated the lawsuit against HTC. But now HTC has responded in kind, claiming that Apple violates a bunch of its patents, while using the ITC loophole to get the iPhone barred from the US.What we're really seeing is what happens when you get a patent thicket in a highly competitive, dynamic area. Suddenly, rather than focusing on competing in the marketplace, and continually outpacing each other by offering new innovations and benefits to consumers, companies start wasting millions upon millions of dollars trying to block competitors from doing the same thing. It leads to a massive net negative impact on society and consumer benefit. What a shame.
At the very least, it appears that HTC recognizes this:
"As the innovator of the original Windows Mobile PocketPC Phone Edition in 2002 and the first Android smartphone in 2008, HTC believes the industry should be driven by healthy competition and innovation that offer consumers the best, most accessible mobile experiences possible."Either way, it's yet another nuclear war in the patent world, taking money away from actual innovation. What a shame.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: patent thicket, patents, smartphones
Companies: apple, htc
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
In addition, the patent system should be revised in order to remove the incentives for such childish behavior.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ignore The Lawsuits
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
yet, without patents and without protection of ideas developed, most companies wouldnt put the money into them to start with. chicken and the egg mr masnick, you cant have one without the other.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
the burden of proof is on you, bucko
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What are you talking about? There is no such thing.
Neither patents, copyright nor trademark provide your fabled protection. Even if there was, how would you stop people from having ideas? Thought police?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
.............
No chance, I know. IP firms would fight it tooth and nail. total racket not just for the companies involved, but the law firms filing and defending patents as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In addition, the patent system should be revised in order to remove the incentives for such childish behavior.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If you get an extra dollar you tend to save a certain amount, you spend a certain amount on x, a certain amount on y, etc... It gets apportioned to whatever provides the most marginal value at the time. Spending more money on R&D provides more marginal value, and more investment income, yes some will go to the executives, some will be spent by them, some will be saved, but the economics will not say that all of it will go directly to executives. Some will go to R&D. But when wasting it on lawsuits is more marginally valuable because you need to defend yourself from losing even more money from the loss of a lawsuit, then that money comes out of other sectors, it doesn't all come out of executive pay, some of it comes out of executive pay, some comes out of R&D research, some comes out of corporate capital, some comes out of employee pay. Econ 101.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Because your speculation is more factually based.
"Based on your own post only some of "millions upon millions of dollars" spent on lawyers comes from R&D."
None is better than some. Without lawsuits no R&D money goes to bogus lawsuits.
"In the case of Apple and HTC the impact on innovation is minimal."
A: How do you know this? and how do you reconcile your speculation with the plethora of evidence that disagrees with you?
B: So you do admit that there is an impact.
"At the end of the day there will be a cross licensing deal and that will be that."
So at the end of the day the alleged purpose of the patent would be negated and the only true function of the patent would be to waste money, money that could go towards innovation instead. Why even grant such patents if they only result in cross licensing deals that defeat their purpose?
"Its not a "shame" that we have patents."
It's an atrocity that we have patents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have never seen a so-called patent thicket interrupt the proliferation of new products wending their way into the marketplace.
Perhaps others have experiences different from mine, but not once has anyone I have worked with sat back on their haunches in self-satisfaction and resting on their laurels because they now had a patent in hand.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Really? You honestly think that having to spend millions of dollars on patent infringement lawsuits doesn't impact the rest of the business?
I have never seen a so-called patent thicket interrupt the proliferation of new products wending their way into the marketplace.
No one said that it stops new products. But it's simply impossible to argue honestly that this is an efficient use of money. I mean, even you, a lawyer who makes your living off the system, has to admit that you know the difference between productive uses of capital and non-productive uses of capital, right?
Perhaps others have experiences different from mine, but not once has anyone I have worked with sat back on their haunches in self-satisfaction and resting on their laurels because they now had a patent in hand.
No one is arguing anything about resting on their laurels here. The question is how a company deploys its capital. And you really want to suggest that the most productive manner may be fighting off patent claims?
No wonder you're anonymous.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If the patents are not preventing new products from entering the market, why do we have them? Aren't they implicitly preventing Motorola from making an iPhone clone right now? If not, what good are these patents?
Now, it may be argued that Motorola having the legal ability to create an iPhone clone would have taken away some of the incentive for Apple to create it to begin with, but you cannot, at the same time, argue that it does not prevent someone from doing so now. Take a side on that - they prevent new products from being brought to the market, or they don't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wouldn't be surprised if HTC is working really closely with Microsoft, and perhaps even Nathan Myrvhold to suck Google's brains out before they all launch a patent war.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wouldn't be surprised if HTC is working really closely with Microsoft, and perhaps even Nathan Myrvhold to suck Google's brains out as they all launch a patent war.
The best thing Google can do is develop their own hardware.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Imagine if you wrote an entire book, spending thousands of dollars on research, countless hours laboring at the keyboard, exaustive time searching for a publisher. You finally find a publisher willing to print, promote and distribute your book, and in return you are paid based on the number of books sold.
Someone reads the book, and likes it so much they copy the idea only making marginal changes (character names, places, etc..) Now both books are available from retailers but your sales are down because now there is an almost identical book for sale from a different author. This other author didn't have to do research, didn't come up with the creative plot line, he just copied your ideas.
This is exactly like intellectual property. The company who invested the time and energy in developing the technology must have protection from copy cats. If not we just end up with no one willing to spend the billions of dollars necessary to create the new technology and there wont be any new technology.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RJR
[ link to this | view in chronology ]