FTC Gives Ann Taylor A Pass In First 'Blog Disclosure' Investigation

from the disclose-everything dept

Fri, May 14th 2010 4:40pm — Mike Masnick

We expressed some serious concerns with the somewhat ambiguous FTC disclosure rules directed at blogs and new media that went into effect last year, and we've been waiting to see how the FTC enforces those rules. We found it odd that the FTC apparently felt that celebrities could be held to different standards. There have been some questions about different activities -- for example, Viacom's actions in trying to make authorized uploads look as if they were bootlegs certainly appears to run afoul of the rules. And, more recently, there were some concerns over the NY Times' lack of disclosure concerning its relationship with Apple when reporting on the iPad.

However, back in February, some were wondering if retailer Ann Taylor's offer of gift cards to bloggers who covered their new line of clothing violated the rules. Apparently, the FTC did take notice, and Michael Scott points us to the news that last month, the FTC decided to give Ann Taylor a one-time pass, though it did express some concerns about the program:

What strikes me as interesting here is that the FTC investigation focuses on the advertiser's actions, rather than the bloggers'. That is, most of the concerns about the program were about whether the FTC would take action against bloggers. But, here, it was focused on the advertiser and its actions. That does make more sense, but does leave open a questionable loophole: if an advertiser tells a blogger to disclose some information and then the blogger does not do so... is the advertiser still liable? In this case, the FTC even mentions that one of the reasons it's not taking action is because many (though not all) of the bloggers, who wrote about the event, disclosed the gift cards. But if they had not -- even though Ann Taylor had told them to -- then is Ann Taylor to blame?

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: advertising, blogs, disclosure, ftc
Companies: ann taylor, ftc

7 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 14 May 2010 @ 4:58pm

even though Ann Taylor had told them to

typo alert...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike Masnick (profile), 14 May 2010 @ 5:28pm
  
  Re:
  typo alert...
  
  Oops. Fixed. Thanks.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 14 May 2010 @ 5:44pm

Sonnovabitch!
All the money we spend there, and we could have gotten freebies for blogging about it?!

Damn you, Ann Taylor!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Andrew F (profile), 14 May 2010 @ 6:01pm

Indemnity
If an advertiser tells a blogger to disclose some information and then the blogger does not do so... is the advertiser still liable?

Maybe -- but if so, then all that'll happen is that there'll be an indemnity clause in future blogger-advertiser contracts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 16 May 2010 @ 9:53am

Video Games
I thought this was starting to become common practice in the Video Game business. To fly reviewers to a hotel somewhere (sometimes Hawaii) to get hands on experience with a game. Does this mean that all reviewers that accept trips like that are required to disclose that in their review?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Daniel Tunkelang (profile), 16 May 2010 @ 7:22pm
  
  Re: Video Games
  Regardless of whether the FTC requires it, I'd hope an ethical reviewer would make sure a disclosure. Wouldn't you? It would be great if advertisers themselves disclosed these practices, but I still think it's the reviewer's responsibility to disclose anything that a reader might reasonably interpret as a conflict of interest.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Technopolitical (profile), 17 May 2010 @ 5:07am

those PDFs embedded in posts
While I think it is great mike that you post those PDF. I use Google Chrome ,, and the PDF , slows down the scroling down the page, It is annoying. Any way you could put PDF views into an "optional" pop-up window , w/o embedding into your post?

It would be helpful
[ link to this | view in chronology ]