How Much Do Most People Really Care About Privacy?
from the or-will-they-only-once-it's-too-late dept
Josh Bernoff has a good post, focused mainly on Facebook's recent privacy PR flap, noting that most people really don't seem to care. That isn't to say that privacy isn't important, and that privacy breaches or attempts to lower levels of privacy aren't concerns -- but a factual statement that your average internet user doesn't really seem all that concerned. There have been plenty of privacy breaches over the years -- and we've even seen that as the number of breaches have grown, people seem to care less and less about them. The companies, who are making those breaches, tend to just see it as a cost of doing business and move on.So that leads to some questions. If people really don't care, is privacy that important? Or is it a situation where people don't realize how much they should care and how much it can impact them? Or... alternatively, is it that people really do have a handle on the situations and realize that, for the most part, these privacy breaches really don't have that big of an impact (especially when they're so large scale that everyone is lumped in together). To some extent, the vastness of some of these privacy issues reminds me of David Brin's old suggestion that the world could be a better place if no one has any privacy, because that complete lack of privacy effectively lets everyone watch everyone else (so there's no asymmetry in the information) and also hides the minor issues that you want to keep private, because everyone's doing them, and so no one pays any attention.
I'm not convinced that's necessarily the case, but I am curious to see how this plays out. Even as some people have done a lot of grandstanding and get a lot of attention on privacy issues, if the majority of people really don't care, and don't see any real impact to questionable privacy practices, do we actually start to move to a world where privacy isn't seen as such an important idea?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
That, and ignorance. Some people just don't get it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think that's a lesson the social-media generation hasn't quite learned yet, and they're getting upset because they're posting things that they might consider personal or intimate with the expectation that they'll be able to control that information once it's online.
And yeah, I think the norms may be heading towards people not caring in the first place.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Overblown issue
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
By definition, we're ignorant of the potential consequences, as we are ignorant of the future. There may be ways that have as yet been unexploited as they haven't been considered. And when a person so inclined determines it's worth their time, then people may care.
People don't care now.. but they will when it affects them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A friend of mine was talking about Lindsay Lohan and other public trainwrecks, and he said, "To be fair, can you imagine if everything WE did in our early 20's was televised? I'm not sure we'd come off looking much better." The point being, EVERYONE does stupid shit when they're young. If all of it is being broadcast, then culturally it'll become a moot point. That's not necessarily a good thing or a bad thing, I just think it's the inevitability of a generation growing up with very little concern for privacy online.
My issue with Facebook was less about the erosion of privacy, and more about how it was handled. Facebook was more or less the only social network I had attempted to use with any degree of privacy, just in the sense that I was only interacting with my real-world friends on it, and keeping it closed off to everyone else. When a company like Facebook sets up the expectation that that's the service it's offering to me, then starts to radically change that service without proper warning or user control over the changes, it creates a huge breach of trust. And when I get the distinct feeling that the way they're going about these changes is specifically engineered to nudge my behavior on Facebook in a certain direction (towards more openness, which is not what I signed up for), it erodes that trust even further.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One of these days
In the past the breeches dealt with just a business at a time. But let a complete network of co-workers, business associates, and consumers be a part of the breech, and add to that a few high class "names". I think the tide will turn.
I hope... and that's all we can do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
People do care about privacy, but
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I care enough about it to not be part of the Facebook lemming brood
If I felt, even for a moment, that someone was spying on my personal life, I would make their own lives so utterly miserable, and inflict such horrific punishment on them, that I would doubtless be their last victim. On the other hand, should I freely display all such information to any casual observers, I would be a complete idiot and deserving of my fate. Very simple stuff, really. I fail to understand why others cannot see this. Massive idiocy on their part is the only explanation I can come up with.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I care enough about it to not be part of the Facebook lemming brood
If I felt, even for a moment, that someone was spying on my personal life, I would make their own lives so utterly miserable, and inflict such horrific punishment on them, that I would doubtless be their last victim. On the other hand, should I freely display all such information to any casual observers, I would be a complete idiot and deserving of my fate. Very simple stuff, really. I fail to understand why others cannot see this. Massive idiocy on their part is the only explanation I can come up with.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Someone who's stolen identity is used to steal their wealth will suddenly care once they experience the consequences.
When they have a hard time getting insured because their proclivity for something is discovered by insurers they'll suddenly start caring.
The problem is the unfelt movement of bits has no discernible effect for people to feel. Most people just can't imagine the real danger in what seems like abstract concepts to them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Most people care a great deal if others listen in when they are having sex or having an argument over personal matters. There are a handful of exhibitionists who wouldn't mind, but most people would go ballistic.
But data is different. Aside from financial matters like credit card numbers and PINs and so on, I doubt most people feel very private about the forms they fill out online. I certainly don't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think that as long as these sites state clearly what information is to be shared, then they're golden.
The only real concern I have is with the sharing of private information when it is not specified that it will be shared. ISP's giving info to copyright holders, for instance, or Facebook sharing private information without explicit consent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Privacy is a thing of the past
What is privacy if I can pay 40 bucks a month and see every bill you have ever paid and every place you have ever lived?
Essentially privacy no longer exists as we once knew it. Your privacy is bought and sold, your personal information marketed to anyone who is interested on a continuous basis.
The common man has seen their privacy disappear, but it is not a two way street. Our governments and corporations get best of both worlds. Privacy for their actions with complete knowledge of everyones business. This allows the ruling class to continue to gain an even stronger foothold over our lives then they had before.
This is what we should be talking about. Think twice when politicians talk about "privacy" because it is always a smoke screen. We have no privacy anymore and the only recourse we have is to make sure the rich and powerful share our fate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
same as always
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Once you have had your identity stolen you will care.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I had no paperwork only collection company phone calls to go on, had to do all the explaining, informing, demanding, credit checking, reporting. Took the entirety of 1998 to wipe up that mess with no help from any quarter including the idiots that made the problem happen. I carry fraud alerts to this day.
It's not the asshattery of posting pictures of oneself drunk and naked on prom night that constitute privacy issues, it's the stuff they're swiping or using against you without your knowledge.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gradations
Case in point: Last weekend, my friends and I coded up a Facebook game that needed to know (1) the gender of your friends and (2) a school or company that they are or were a part of. That's not a lot of information and hardly the thing most people care about keeping private. However, when I ran the game, only 33% of my friends actually made that information available to me.
This is a very small sample, but it confirms what I've observed anecdotally: the quantity and quality of the information available on Facebook, even to trusted "friends", is not what it used to be. People are deleting things (or in some cases, just not exerting any effort to update). That hurts Facebook. It makes their platform less attractive to app developers and less valuable to advertisers.
So yeah, privacy does matter. It's just that the market often acts subtly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Gradations
Hi Andrew: I don't see where I made that assumption. Sorry if you think I implied it somewhere, but I don't believe that to be true, and I definitely did not mean to suggest it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Gradations
[ link to this | view in chronology ]