If You Want To Encourage Free Press And Free Expression, Subsidize Broadband, Not Newspapers
from the enable,-not-protect dept
As we get ready to kick off our Techdirt Saves* Journalism event, it's definitely been an interesting day on the "journalism" front. Earlier today, we wrote about Iceland's decision to create a haven for free expression and press protections. And now techflaws.org alerts us to a column by Dan Gillmor, responding in part to the suggestions the FTC discussed yesterday at its workshop on saving journalism, which seemed to be a lot more about saving newspapers than saving journalism. Gillmor's point: if you want to make sure journalism lasts, the response should be to subsidize more broadband, in terms of both speed and access, rather than subsidizing news organizations. Building on the history of the US, which included the decision to make postage for news mailings quite low to encourage their dissemination, Gillmor points out that enabling infrastructure, and then getting out of the way, is the best way to enable a strong and free press:First, direct subsidies for journalism are the wrong way to go, even dangerous. But we absolutely could use the kind of indirect help -- taxpayer-funded deployment of high-capacity, wide-open broadband networks -- that would be an analogue to the early American postal subsidies, and then some. This would be essential infrastructure, aimed at beefing up all 21st Century commerce and communications, including but not limited to journalism.Gillmor then goes on, in great detail, about why this makes sense, in that it actually promotes a lot more competition and opportunities for journalism to thrive, rather than just trying to prop up the old system of journalism. There are, of course, other issues with subsidizing broadband, but if the focus is on journalism, encouraging widespread access to information and the ability for others to create information definitely does seem like an area worth exploring.
Second, if we got serious about broadband in this way, entrepreneurs would almost certainly come up with the journalism, including a variety of business models to augment or replace today's, that would provide the public good we all agree comes with journalism and other trustworthy information.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: broadband, enabling, free speech, infrastructure, journalism
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I completely agree, I would much rather tax dollars be spent on subsidizing broadband than an obsolete business model involving paper with very slow information transportation speeds leading to constantly outdated information and a very limited amount of information per newspaper (since newspapers have to worry about saving paper), not to mention a business model that wastes trees and is terribly cost inefficient in comparison (ie: you must pay for labor to constantly hand out newspapers). Not that I necessarily favor government subsidies, what I favor more is for the government not to grant monopolies on the use of existing infrastructure and on the ability to build new infrastructure so that newcomers can enter the broadband market. But the U.S. government is a joke anyways.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
well, not really. what it does get you is millions of people tweeting "i found a parking spot" and "baby just burped". making broadband widely available doesnt save journalism, if anything it brings up the noise level to the point of drowning it out.
so far, the only part of journalism techdirt appears to be saving is the self-justification part.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
and since when did you get to define what constitutes journalism? The stuff discussed on Techdirt better informs us about the world than the censored nonsense we get from newspapers and television. Outside the Internet who reports on the "journalists" and their misbehaviors (ie: the lobbying efforts of the newspaper and MSM industry to distort the free market)? No one. At least on the Internet journalists can criticize "journalists" and write about their misbehavior. If true journalism outside the Internet existed copy restriction laws wouldn't last 95 years because these "journalists" would be sure to stand up for the public interest and inform the public about these nefarious laws. But they are part of the problem not part of the solution and so the public outside the Internet is intentionally kept ignorant about the many monopolistic laws that serve the common detriment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
FYI- every time I read your groundbreaking comments, it's a reminder that I have to get a vasectomy... again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_McLuhan
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"If You Want To Encourage Free Press And Free Expression, Subsidize Broadband, Not Newspapers"
( boring day so far if I agree with you all the time. )
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "If You Want To Encourage Free Press And Free Expression, Subsidize Broadband, Not Newspapers"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Still doesn't make you less of a liar.//// Not Newspapers"
Show me where and when ,I have lied in my posts.
-------------------------------------
( As I have stated , lying is against my religion -- forbidden by Jewish law VERY clearly-- [but to save life , or spare feelings]
( I have updated my profile here , to help you and others , find all the "dirt" on me you want.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Want to encourage freedom of anything? Don't subsidize things in the first place.
Please do elaborate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Subsidize the Infrastructure is correct...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]