There Is No 'Internet Kill Switch' Legislation... And Pretending There Is Distracts From The Real Debate

from the overhyped-analysis dept

Tue, Jul 20th 2010 2:38am — Mike Masnick

In mid-June, we noted that due to all the questionable cyberwar hype, Senator Joe Lieberman had introduced a "cybersecurity" bill. We had plenty of issues with that bill, but still found it odd a week or so later, when we started getting all sorts of submissions from people saying that Lieberman was trying to implement an "internet kill switch." As bad as the bill appears to be, there isn't an internet kill switch in the bill, and so we wrote another post pointing that out.

However, it appears that the meme of an "internet kill switch" -- which apparently was first put forth by Declan McCullough -- has pretty much taken over the debate on the bill. And some are noting that this is problematic, as there are lots of real issues to be discussed around the bill, and focusing on the bogus "internet kill switch" makes it less likely those other, real, issues will get as much attention.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: internet, kill switch, legislation

12 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 20 Jul 2010 @ 3:21am

which is why...
... the people in favor of this bill are in favor of having this bill "battled over" and the 'Internet kill switch' part 'taken out' then the bill passed because "its better now"....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- abc gum, 20 Jul 2010 @ 4:50am
  
  Re: which is why...
  "are in favor of having this bill "battled over""
  
  Like children, they enjoy arguing.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Jul 2010 @ 5:00am

What Lieberman wants is to all traffic to go through a few points that he can control, that is it.

Which is ironic because the internet works best when it have no choke points, it is resilient because it cannot be dismembered, it was created exactly for the purpose of being able to survive such attacks he said it wants to prevent and yet he wants to handicap it so it make it even more vulnerable to crippling attacks.

This is not about cyber attacks is about spying on everyone and reducing the work the government has right now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Sean T Henry (profile), 20 Jul 2010 @ 8:26am
  
  Re:
  If they get the internet to go through a few points for everything it removes the need for net-neutrality. Or better said forces a requirement for net-bias since the internet can't handle pushing all the data through that one pipe so we need to prioritize the packets. Also it would give Telcos an extra arguing point for gov funding to "build out" there infrastructure. (LOL the thought of them building out.)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Jul 2010 @ 5:04am

If he is so preoccupied about national security he should be nagging Obama to produce results on the internet infra-structure to augment its capabilities so it is not vulnerable from other countries that have bigger pipes.

Australia did it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Black Patriot (profile), 20 Jul 2010 @ 7:00am
  
  Re:
  lol, we might be building a national broadband network, but it's going to take so long to build that it'll be out of date. Realistically it's already out of date, as the NBN is only designed to have speeds of around 100 Mbit, whereas other countries have Gigabit internet connections available.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
out_of_the_blue, 20 Jul 2010 @ 5:13am

"The Internet's public-private balance is a difficult one."
From the last link, one "Nancy Scola". -- No, it's not. Just gov't STAY OUT.

Now, having read the piece at that last link, I feel MISLED from your phrase: "there are lots of real issues". -- Not at that link, just a few paragraphs, first self-referencing, then saying it's "important", and that Obama won't have a giant red button on his desk. That's not journalism, just blather.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Jul 2010 @ 9:32am

Declan's never let the truth stand in the way of a sensational story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don P., 20 Jul 2010 @ 9:54am

Typical McCullough. Remember how he made shit up about Gore in 2000?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Jul 2010 @ 10:07am

It's not so much an "Internet Kill Switch" as it is an "Internet Death Panel".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DanVan (profile), 20 Jul 2010 @ 2:39pm

People don't care whether one actually exists.......they heard it on Fox News and therefore it MUST be true

The fact that people can't actually read what is in the bill is pathetic but pretty much sums up the IQ of the right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- JBDragon, 2 Aug 2010 @ 5:09pm
  
  Re:
  Like the Democrats that can't be bothered to read any bills and flat out SAY SO!!! There may not be a so called Internet Kill Switch in THIS bill, but it puts the Government is far more control that it shouldn't have, and just like everything else, before long, there's yet another bill a few years later that really does give the government a Internet Kill Switch!!! Which is a BAD thing no matter WHO is running the Government. Just to prove my point, here's a good example!!!
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW7mOaPnYYA
  
  That's just sad, rush though a bill that no one has time to read, or understand, and really just don't care. I don't care what side your on, it's just plain WRONG.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]