New Zealand To Dump Software Patents Afterall (But Will Allow 'Embedded Software' Patents)
from the back-and-forth dept
Back in March, we discussed a report claiming that New Zealand politicians wanted to completely outlaw software patents. However, in June, it was reported that a lobbying group claiming to represent tech industry companies, NZICT, had convinced politicians to back down somewhat, and go back to allowing certain types of software patents. In our comments, there was a bit of an interesting discussion, with one knowledgeable New Zealander noting that NZICT mostly represents foreign tech companies, and that none of the top 15 New Zealand software firms are members.It looks like those reports of NZ politicians backing down may have been a bit premature. Chirag Mehta points us to the news that, despite the lobbying effort, it's been announced that the patent bill will not be changed, thus basic software will remain unpatentable. However, the details suggest that embeddable software can be patented, and there are some concerns that the "guidelines" (yet to be developed) for such embeddable software will be used by some to sneak in standard software patents.
Still, it's good to see New Zealand realizing that basic software patents can be harmful. It sounds like a big help was the fact that the two biggest New Zealand software companies both came out against software patents certainly helped. Orion Health noted that patents generally are "counter-productive" and "are often used obstructively." The company also noted that the " best protection is to innovate and innovate fast." Exactly. Meanwhile, Jade said: "We believe the patent process is onerous, not suited to the software industry, and challenges our investment in innovation."
And really, the fact that the domestic software industry doesn't want software patents, while foreign competitors did, is not a surprise. If you look back at the history of patents, it's the same story over and over again. When Switzerland was finally pressured into adding patent protection for dyes, it was due to strong pressure from foreign dyemakers. When Italy was finally pressured into adding patents on pharmaceuticals, again it was due to strong pressure from foreign pharmaceutical firms. In both cases, after patents were put in place, they weren't used to make those industries more innovative, but for large multinational conglomerates to come in and lock up the market. It's nice to see that New Zealand may avoid this fate on software.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: new zealand, patents, software patents
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Anyway, since New Zealand have signed the TRIPS agreement it's good to have examples to point to of countries that interprete it such that excluding software patents is possible. That's very welcome.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Because we all know you couldn't possible be first at anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I read this article last night and I had and realized how telling it would be to see the ratio of software patent supports are software developers vs lawyers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Lion Sleeps Tonight
Securing anything cost thousands of dollars if not millions, raise insurmountable barriers and give rise to exploitative tactics that diminish any culture inside society.
People loose sight of what it is important. i.e. Work done.
They start thinking they can live of some dream pipe idea for eternity that is not how reality works, when work stops so do innovation and infra-structure growth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
masnik is full of it
- purely quantitative
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: masnik is full of it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: masnik is full of it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: masnik is full of it
For love of all things Internet, please back the f-ck off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Leading Software Programmer Agrees
This is the link to the video.
http://bigthink.com/ideas/20905
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Proof in the Pudding
As such a relatively small country in population, economy, and intellectual property...I'm curious to see what kind of trial balloon results this actually gives us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Software patents
In fact, most IP is so badly abused today that we really need a major revamp, starting with eliminating software and business method patents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Software patents
I think the first step to embracing this law change is to setup a new sourceforge spin-off in NZ. Whether the NZ economy benefits from this law will play out over a few years. Will other countries change their laws? Will the quantity of software patent litigation in the U.S. continue to increase at such a rapid rate? If other countries don't change their laws and patent litigation continues it's exponential growth you can be sure hundreds of small software firms will be at least domiciled in NZ.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]