Website Company Threatens To Sue Guy Who Criticizes Quality Of Gordon Brown's Website

from the how-not-to-win-fans dept

Tue, Jul 27th 2010 4:25am — Mike Masnick

Glyn Moody points us to a bizarre story of a thin-skinned exec at a UK company, called Tangent, who apparently has some sort of web content management system, which is used by many politicians in the UK, including former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who uses it for his website. A guy named Luke Bozier saw the website, and thought it looked pretty bad for the website of a former Prime Minister, and wrote a blog post about it and tweeted:

Gordon Brown's WebCreator website is not befitting of a former Prime Minister. Tangent should be ashamed.

Apparently, someone from Tangent was not impressed and sent Bozier an email threatening legal action against him if he didn't remove the tweet:

I respectfully suggest you delete that tweet, issue no more similar ones and generally try to sell your products in a more professional way. I really don't like the prospect of either a public slanting match or legal action, but if I need to protect my company's business and reputation, I will.

Of course, even with the ridiculous state of UK libel laws, it's difficult to see what's libelous about expressing an opinion about the quality of a website, and then suggesting that the company behind the tools used to create the website "should be ashamed." And, as the blog post linked above notes, this effort to silence Bozier to "protect" Tangent's reputation, has done exactly the opposite:

The word on the web is now that Tangent, previously unheard of by most, is an aggressively litigious PLC which employs threats of legal action in attempts to suppress the free expression of opinion. This is the result of the utter folly in believing that spurious controls can be put on the sheer democracy of social media.

Instant, online justice is now served on those heavy handed and mindless enough to attempt to suppress freedom of speech through impotent legal threats.

It really is amazing that people issuing such legal threats still don't realize how likely they are to backfire, though it is still amusing to watch.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: defamation, gordon brown, twitter, uk, webcreator, websites
Companies: tangent

45 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Schmoo, 27 Jul 2010 @ 4:38am

They're both wrong: it's not nearly as bad as Bozier implies, but it's also not nearly as good as Tangent seem to think it is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- senshikaze (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 5:11am
  
  Re:
  Yea. Not horrible, just bland.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 5:34am
    
    Re: Re:
    Kind of like their food. =]
    
    It is hard to see why anyone would pay for such lackluster web page design, especially an elected official.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Richard (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 5:39am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Kind of like their food. =]
      
      Whose food exactly?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 5:49am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Okay...you asked for it. The British and your mom's. =]
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Dark Helmet (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 5:55am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        "Okay...you asked for it. The British and your mom's. =]"
        
        I'm sure you meant "Mum's"....
        
        Honest mistake....
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        John Cheese, 28 Jul 2010 @ 1:48am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        He meant yer Mum's Bum.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Marcel de Jong (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 6:00am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Your mom asked for it last night...
        
        btw, ever been to a curry place in the UK? Hardly bland.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Dark Helmet (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 6:04am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Honestly, if you're looking for bland horrible food, Ireland is the place to be....
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Jaws4theRevenge (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 6:20am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Nope, I'm pretty sure America would still be best for that.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Free Capitalist (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 6:35am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Honestly, if you're looking for bland horrible food, Indiana is the place to be....
        
        FTFY
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Dark Helmet (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 6:48am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        "Honestly, if you're looking for bland horrible food, Indiana is the place to be....
        
        FTFY"
        
        You know....when you're wrong, you're wrong, and I have clearly been outdone on this one....
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Richard (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 9:06am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Okay...you asked for it. The British and your mom's. =]
        
        Well - 50 years ago maybe. - but in my experience British food is now comparable to other European countries like France, probably not quite up to Italian standards or the far East - but all of these are better then "new world food" (as in US/ Oz/ SA).
        
        Of course most good British food is not actually British - but Indian/Chinese/Italian/Thai etc.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Dark Helmet (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 9:14am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        "but all of these are better then "new world food" (as in US/ Oz/ SA)."
        
        Please, our German immigrants gave the world the hot dog. That gift alone makes your argument invalid....
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        nasch (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 9:36am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        You had the hamburger, any number of delicious sausages such as bratwurst, sauerkraut, German chocolate cake, Black Forest ham... and you went with hot dogs?? ;-)
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Dark Helmet (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 9:39am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Half of what you listed was not invented in the States. The Hot Dog was, either in St. Louis or the World's Fair in Chicago, depending on who you believe....
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Mike Masnick (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 10:05am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Half of what you listed was not invented in the States. The Hot Dog was, either in St. Louis or the World's Fair in Chicago, depending on who you believe....
        
        And yet, it wasn't perfected until it made it to Coney Island.
        
        Unlike in Chicago where they somehow think hot dogs are so bad they need to be covered in layer upon layer of gunk to hide the taste.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Dark Helmet (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 10:15am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        "Unlike in Chicago where they somehow think hot dogs are so bad they need to be covered in layer upon layer of gunk to hide the taste."
        
        Okay, see now you're just embarrasing yourself. The Chicago hot dog is the second closest man has ever come to perfection (the first being ninety feet between home plate an first base, as the saying goes). The sheer genius of condiment combination is only surpassed by the clearvoyance that was required to take ketchup and keep it off the list.
        
        Here's a good test: count how many venues outside of Chicago sell Chicago style hotdogs, and how many venues outside of Coney Island sell Coney Island or New York style hot dogs, and that'll be your answer. I mean, at least when we had our pizza discussion, you had a semblance of a case. Here? Nahhhhh....
        
        Oh, and btw, screw you for getting me addicted to OOTP Baseball. I never knew managing the Peoria Chiefs A ball team could be fun....
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 27 Jul 2010 @ 1:44pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Well, let me look around here.
        
        Chicago: 2
        Coney: about 25
        
        Yeah, Coney dogs rock.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Mike Masnick (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 11:03pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Okay, see now you're just embarrasing yourself. The Chicago hot dog is the second closest man has ever come to perfection (the first being ninety feet between home plate an first base, as the saying goes). The sheer genius of condiment combination is only surpassed by the clearvoyance that was required to take ketchup and keep it off the list.
        
        Heh, heh. Well, as with the pizza discussion, I'm mostly joking around. I'm actually a fan of both styles.
        
        Here's a good test: count how many venues outside of Chicago sell Chicago style hotdogs, and how many venues outside of Coney Island sell Coney Island or New York style hot dogs, and that'll be your answer. I mean, at least when we had our pizza discussion, you had a semblance of a case. Here? Nahhhhh....
        
        Hmm. I'm not sure what you're implying. Almost everywhere I go I see NY style hotdogs. I can't think of anywhere outside of Chicago that I've seen Chicago style hot dogs. Frankly, I didn't even know they existed until a few years ago when I first made it to Chicago and my sister-in-law explained the Chicago style hot dog concept to me.
        
        Oh, and btw, screw you for getting me addicted to OOTP Baseball. I never knew managing the Peoria Chiefs A ball team could be fun....
        
        :) I did warn you that it was better than Baseball Mogul, yes? Maybe we should start a Techdirt OOTP league.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Dark Helmet (profile), 28 Jul 2010 @ 5:51am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        ":) I did warn you that it was better than Baseball Mogul, yes? Maybe we should start a Techdirt OOTP league."
        
        If you gave me another week or so to get completely in tune with the game, I'd would be 100% down for that. The question is, who would be your team? Yanks? Mets? Giants? A's?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        nasch (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 10:35am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Oh, so you were going for great food invented in the US? If I'm not mistaken, we can claim pizza and the ice cream cone, both of which are obviously superior to hot dogs. For new world food generally, there's all kinds of Mexican food that's better than hot dogs too. I haven't had much if any South American food, but I'll bet they have some great stuff. Can you tell I don't like hot dogs that much?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Dark Helmet (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 10:46am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        "Can you tell I don't like hot dogs that much?"
        
        That's okay, most communists don't....
        
        ;)
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        nasch (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 1:01pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Damn, I never thought that's what would give me away.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Niall (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 12:41pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I think you'll find pizza was invented in Naples, Italy. Probably before the US was 'invented' itself.
        
        As for British food being 'foreign', we have a tendency to adopt 'foreign' food and make it our own. In fact, one of the most popular Indian dishes in the world (outside of India) is Chicken Tikka Masala, invented in Britain - and I believe it has become pretty popular in India as well since!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        nasch (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 1:02pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I think you'll find pizza was invented in Naples, Italy.
        
        Correct. I was shooting from the hip.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 27 Jul 2010 @ 1:45pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Yeah, it was just perfected in the US
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Dark Helmet (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 1:04pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        We do that in the States as well. See Chop Suey, for example....
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Richard (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 5:38am
    
    Re: Re:
    Agreed - it is also no worse than any of the other former prime minister's websites (Tony Blair's seems to be done by the same people - and John Major's is even blander - as you would expect!)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - vivaelamor (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 5:59am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      "Agreed - it is also no worse than any of the other former prime minister's websites (Tony Blair's seems to be done by the same people - and John Major's is even blander - as you would expect!)"
      
      From Mr Bozier's blog: "Tony Blair’s is far better, and it isn’t a Tangent website". I can't find who did design Blair's.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Richard (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 9:11am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Didn't look any better to me - looked rather similar - so I guessed it could be the same people.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- medlaw, 27 Jul 2010 @ 6:04am
  
  Re: schmoo
  They're both wrong? That's not the point at all. The point is that the blogger gave an honest opinion, whatever its merits. The corporate giant replied not with facts and reasoned argumentation but with the threat of expensive legal action. The merits of the underlying dispute regarding the value of Tangent's tools is irrelevant. The corporation is trying to crush free speech. Boo on them. Shout the offender down with valid counter arguments if you have been wronged.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Schmoo, 27 Jul 2010 @ 6:52am
    
    Re: Medlaw
    I thought Mike covered 'the' point pretty well myself. Maybe I should've just repeated that instead of adding something new?
    
    (Trivial sure, banal even, but new nonetheless.)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - The Groove Tiger (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 7:44am
      
      Re: Re: Medlaw
      Now now guys, don't go wandering off into... tangents.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gracey (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 5:30am

Agreed - sort of bland indeed. Not horrid, but not terribly professional either.

It does have some good points though - navigation is easy, and it's not too cluttered.

I would expect something a little more professional, I suppose. It looks like not much more than a wordpress blog, and some of those (even the free templates) have a little more finesse.

I'd think that one person's opinion would be of little importance if Gordon Brown (or his staff) find it functional.

Tangent needs to suck it up. Everyone isn't going to like their stuff, so it's time to get over it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fungo Knubb (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 5:41am

RE:
The web site is about as imaginative as one should expect from an unimaginative politician. Its not horrible, but its not something to shout about either, but then what do you expect. If Tangent can't take criticism then they should find some other business. Now everyone knows what a lack-luster product they have, and its all over the web. Justice has been served up, Internet style!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Jul 2010 @ 5:50am

"The word on the web is now that Tangent, previously unheard of by most"

That's how I know this is a just publicity stunt. All press is good press.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Jul 2010 @ 5:50am
  
  Re:
  this is just a publicity stunt *
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
DS, 27 Jul 2010 @ 5:50am

Tangent Sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Jul 2010 @ 5:50am

Glad I don't live in Britain! The United States is bad enough. Britain doesn't protect any of it's citizens from the predatory corporations, just like the US. But honestly CMS sucks. It's a pretext to cutting down work and actually it is more work to learn the stupid system. Who needs it. I wouldn't trust CMS security at all and any web developer that uses one will learn to write his own code and forget the canned crap. Gee will I be sued by Drupal (crap), Joomla (crap) or will they sue me for using Jack Nicholson's lines from Batman.
More Crap!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- vivaelamor (profile), 27 Jul 2010 @ 6:03am
  
  Re:
  "But honestly CMS sucks. It's a pretext to cutting down work and actually it is more work to learn the stupid system".
  
  Ah yes, the noble tradition of updating websites manually. Did I say noble? I meant stupid.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Jul 2010 @ 5:56am

Web site lame- tangent lamer. One would hope that their lawyers would try and talk them out of such a suicidal position. I would guess that the tweet was retweeted fairly frequently after the take down notice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trending topics, 27 Jul 2010 @ 7:18am

Retweet party! :D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
out_of_the_blue, 27 Jul 2010 @ 8:16am

As Tangent is obviously "well connected",
then assumed notions of "fair play" and "legalities" are practically irrelevant. My bet is the Tangent "thin-skinned exec" is used to getting his way through political influence, especially since this reflects directly on politicians, and this Bozier had better stay out of dark alleys.

Perhaps that isn't clear enough for you culinary wits. -- Politicians are *nothing* but gangsters these days, and they and their favored consultants have ways to revenge an insult, no matter if trivial, many of the ways being illegal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Jul 2010 @ 4:01pm

his website is crap looking, that company should be ashamed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]