Canada More Or Less Admits Its Copyright Reform Plan Is Driven By US, Following DMCA Exemption Rulings
from the why-wait-until-now? dept
With the Librarian of Congress issuing the latest round of DMCA anti-circumvention exemptions, many Canadians who were battling over the proposed anti-circumvention provisions in C-32, the proposed copyright reform bill, noted how the new exceptions were not found in the Canadian proposal. The key issue was the idea, as Canadian politicians (and the entertainment industry) had suggested, that such exceptions might not bring it into compliance with various treaties. However, with the US showing that such exemptions are allowed, apparently Canadian politicians are "reviewing" the rulemaking to see what "implications" there may be for C-32.While I'm glad that Canadian politicians may be reconsidering their awful digital locks provision, it seems odd that it would take a US rulemaking for them to do so. After all, one of the key talking points by Canadian politicians is that this is a "made in Canada" approach to copyright, rather than being driven by the US. So, why would a US rulemaking matter? While it's good that this rulemaking is in a good direction, the fact that Canada didn't think to include similar exemptions in its copyright law until this rulemaking is more or less a confession that the copyright law was based on US rules and US interests, rather than Canadian interests.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: canada, circumvention, copyright, digital locks, dmca, drm, rule making
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
301 Special Reasons
Not that it is good policy to follow your neighbors off the cliff, but historically, Canada has, in general, has put effort into open trade relations with the United States.
Putting aside the entertainment industry's world wide government buy out efforts, you probably agree it is likely the politicians are getting pressure to get off the United States' annual Axis of Evil, Bad, Terrorist, IP Pirate, Artist Raping Nations List.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 301 Special Reasons
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Radical Extremists
* Everyone except me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Radical Extremists
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its because any Country wants to be able to work in world markets
For the US to do business with England of any other countries then they can to comply with the laws of the other countries.
So it makes sense for canada or any other country to have similar rules and laws governing their society, it makes it easier for international trade, and also easy to work in other countries.
So if you want to sell your product in the US you have to work by the laws of the US, if you want to sell your product in Canada, then again you have to work within those laws.
So it makes sense that if two countries have essentually the same laws, trade and commerce is easier.
Its not the US that defines copyright law or IP law, and it certainly was not the US that started it.
They used systems established in other countries, with sligh modifications, and canada is doing the same.
Its a good idea, especially if you consider how difficult it is to trade with countries with very different rules and laws.
Again, its all about setting the rule of the game, and ensuring all play by those rules.
Then its simple, if you dont like the rules you dont play the game.
(you dont go and steal their ball, and make up your own game, with no rules).
*If you do that you are not playing the game, your cheating, stealing, copying, and thats why there are laws agaist not playing by the rules.
If you dont like the rules, seek to have them changed, become a politician, or a lawyer.
How often has anarchy achieved the desired results, how many times have governments said, OK, you can break that law now, we give up?
If Governments created stupid rules, and rules that hurt society, they would be voted out, or the rule would not be passed in the first place.
thats why its a majority of those, and their representitives that get to make the rules, because that is what most people want.
Its called Democracy...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its because any Country wants to be able to work in world markets
I simply don't believe that anymore - rules are made for those with the most lobbying dollars these days - not the majority of the people as you claim. The system is broken in favor of those with the deepest pockets.
We might have had Democracy at one time - but not so much anymore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its because any Country wants to be able to work in world markets
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its because any Country wants to be able to work in world markets
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its because any Country wants to be able to work in world markets
I'd like to live where you live, unfortunately I'm stuck in reality. In reality politicians are bought and paid for, and citizens are too disorganized to actively protest, let alone affect change. The 2 party system locks out any change, as the candidates are chosen to be a choice between 2 evils. Anarchy did score one big win in getting rid of prohibition, and it is still working on marijuana. Not huge useful victories, but you take what you can get.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its because any Country wants to be able to work in world markets
If this were true copy protection laws wouldn't last 95+ years. I highly doubt that most Americans agree with this nonsense. We don't live in a democracy, we live in a corporate plutocracy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its because any Country wants to be able to work in world markets
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its because any Country wants to be able to work in world markets
Like the U.S. did with ACTA right, they got their ball and are trying to make their own game outside an international body to have their way.
So I guess Europe and the U.S. should be punished for not being team players in the global field.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its because any Country wants to be able to work in world markets
I thought it was the statue of Liberty?
"If Governments created stupid rules, and rules that hurt society, they would be voted out, or the rule would not be passed in the first place.
thats why its a majority of those, and their representitives that get to make the rules, because that is what most people want.
Its called Democracy..."
I think you are i-overdosing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its because any Country wants to be able to work in world markets
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
By "US" he meant the entertainment industries.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: cheap abercrombie clothes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Admitted
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Admitted
Are you saying The Conservatives listened to the people of Canada? Ha! I haven't LOLed that hard in years.
Have you looked up the results from last years consultations?
6000 vs 60. They ignored the 6000 and listened to the 60.
Or the change to the Census rules. Again, ignoring the people.
The Conservative party has never been about listening to the voices of the people of Canada during my lifetime.
I think they are a bit like Apple, they have a nice shiny exterior that appeals to a lot of people, but deep down, they think that they know best, and the users/voters shall have no say on anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"it would take a US rulemaking for them to do so"
I still call myself a Proud Canadian, but of late my government is doing its damnedest to destroy that pride...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
about markets
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@15 harper has no power
and i mean barely
as soon as a real leader of the opposition appears harper is DOOMED TOTALLY
half his own party dont want this c32
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Canada and jailbreaking phones
Get real, Mike, it is not a digital world, it is an analog world - picking up something useful from someone else does not mean you are under their domination.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]