Hollywood Trying To Get A Special Anti-Party Crashing Law
from the party-poopers dept
Apparently, the movie studio execs in Hollywood who brought you such classic films as The Wedding Crashers only likes to glorify the idea of crashing parties when it's not their parties. They've evidently convinced politicians representing the state of California that rather than fixing some of the massive problems with the bankrupt state, they should create a special new form of trespassing law to stop party crashers. Essentially, the movie studios are upset that people kept sneaking into their big awards shows and related events, and they don't feel that existing trespassing laws are enough, so they want to throw such party crashers in jail for six months. Nice to know that Hollywood, and the politicians who work for Hollywood, have their priorities straight.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: california, hollywood, party crashing, trespassing
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tsk Tsk
But yes the real shame is that politicians think that protecting Hollywood parties is more important than small stuff like budgets, crime, health care, etc....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tsk Tsk
Not to mention the California is facing severe budget constraints as it is, so they think they need to spend more taxpayer money to confine trespassers longer?
Yeah, that's sensible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Tsk Tsk
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
going rate
Does anyone have a current price list??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: going rate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: going rate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: going rate
Google, Facebook and others come behind with 3 million dollars together more or less.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: going rate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The same thing happens for the auto industry in Michigan or the farmers in Iowa.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Constituents
> their constituents.
I think the 39 million other people in California outnumber Hollywood in terms of constituency.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Constituents
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Constituents
Tuna should have said that they're there to listen to their *paying* constituents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Constituents
> to their *paying* constituents.
Well, no. That may be the way they're behaving, but that's not their purpose.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Phewww!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Overcrowding
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Overcrowding
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Offense: Dismaying the Self-Righteous
That's exactly what California needs in its fiscal crisis: more prisoners incarcerated for victimless crimes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Offense: Dismaying the Self-Righteous
What? You call being exposed to the presence of commoners "victimless"?
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its a problem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bad Hollywood,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]