Once More (With Feeling): There's Still A Role For Record Labels... But It's Changing
from the in-case-you-forgot dept
We've been accused, repeatedly, of simply disliking record labels or trying to make them go away. Nothing has been further from the truth. In fact, for years, we've pointed out that there's still a role for record labels, and noted that the "problem" isn't so much the idea of middlemen, it's just how some of those middlemen have functioned over time. Much of our criticism is targeted not at "labels," but at specific actions by certain (generally major) labels, that seem to actually be designed to hold back music and new music business models. We'd be perfectly happy if those labels adopted smarter business models and have regularly tried to make constructive suggestions on what they could do.And yet... people still say that we just hate all record labels and middlemen and want them to fail.
But we've regularly highlighted smart labels doing cool things, and others are noticing that as well. The New Yorker has a nice article pointing out that there's still a role for record labels to help a band do all the stuff it doesn't want to do itself, and that many indie labels have done a good job figuring this out. The article focuses mainly on the band Arcade Fire, and the success it's had, despite being on a small "indie label." It mentions the band Vampire Weekend, which has also had similar success.
There's nothing revolutionary about what their labels are doing. It's just that the bands generally have a bit more control and are less a cog in a giant machine, allowing them to stay a bit more true to their musical roots. As the article notes, this is "not a radical change so much as a scaling back, a return to a business model that involves fewer people, and concentrates on the product." Indeed, it notes that the major record labels are still where bands may go to play the lottery -- to try to get that one big check. But these more innovative and nimble indie labels are where a band is likely to go if it actually wants to make a career.
So, there's nothing wrong with labels at all. Our problem has never been with the concept of a record label. It's just with record labels that have worked hard to abuse the system in ways that cause more damage to musicians, fans, music and the wider society. Unfortunately, those efforts have been so public and so brash that many people have lumped all labels into the category of "bad." But, hopefully, that's starting to change, as people recognize that there are lots of useful services that a smart record label can provide.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: business models, record labels
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
We don't hate the labels? Thats news to me. I mean filling suit against 30,000 people. Corrupting the legal system of the US and other countries. Stating that there should be a death penalty for file sharing. Destroying every web site that could possibly be a beacon of hope for the musicians. Using creative accounting and legal contracts to steal from artists. Slamming the Creative commons, EFF, etc.
Yeah, we should sit back and feel true love for these parasites ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Yes they do. But, they are not needed anymore. They are legacy players with a very limited lifespan. When efficiencies are discovered and slip into a financial system the companies that don't implement these new efficiencies are doomed to failure. What you have are a dozen or so efficiencies that have come into the music industry. The final missing efficiency is that of promotion. Once you have a group or system that does promotion more efficiently than the labels its over for them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Hiring a specialist isn't necessarily being lazy; especially if it helps increase your work output in your own area of expertise. Some labels already appear to be making it easier for the creator. I don't think it is a matter of time, merely choice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
RIAA, ASCAP, the big 4 Labels, there really is no seperating them. Their actions have all been anti-competative, anti-consumer, and monopolistic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fault is in the term
However, if 'label' is defined as an intermediary that commissions an artist to record their talent in order to make billions of copies (with a label affixed) of it to sell at monopoly inflated prices then, no, the role of that intermediary has ended.
The market for copies has ended.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As long as people need this excuse, all the "we're not against middlemen" is a subterfuge.
Cool ideas? When will you get it, these people want effective, highly profitable ideas for a new kind of value added middleman. Only showing good is better at making them filthy stinking rich will work.
Being on food stamps, but with your artistic integrity intact is not, as you say, "nit picking the numbers." When the numbers suck, the model sucks.
Either put up a model that works, with a load level of tens of thousands of bands, or test one out. Start your own label with these newfangled best practices. Show 'em how its done.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Scenario: you're on a sinking ship and there aren't enough lifeboats. Someone in one of the lifeboats suggests an improvisation. Do you tell them that they should test the improvisation out on a fully loaded ship, or try it because the ship is sinking and you're not suicidal?
If you put more effort into your own subterfuge then I might put some more effort into my scenarios.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you produce your own stuff and subcontract the so-called "labels", they're just services, and they shouldn't get a say on what brand name is on your shiny plastic disc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dead and goodridance
I find it commendable if they INVEST in the artist they represent and they add something to the offering of the artists.
At the end of the day the public purchases music, not packaging, nor plush offices, nor care that the executives have the best yatchs they can have in the marina.
Labels should be pounding the pavement and giving exposure and thinking up ad campaigns for their talents, not just expecting to get rich out of monopolies, cartels and protectionism.
In other words...GET A JOB!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
POWER and KRAFT DINNER
PEOPLE that eat kraft dinner often do not have a lot of power...they are regular folk. SO the theory goes we should be forcing politicians and lawyers to eat it publically to make htem "regular", and to this end will will form...
K.R.A.P. Policy
Kraft Rabid Abusive Politicians Policy. This policy states that the first bad decision you make you are forced to publically eat 5 boxes at one sitting of kraft dinner and no other food for 2 days. THIS doubles exponentially until you can't do it no more and are remvoed form office as a fat pig.
THEN you must enter
F.A.T.T.Y program
fat abusive twits that yell
This program put syou on a welfare diet for the remainder of your life, with no chance of parole.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: POWER and KRAFT DINNER
Also that 'fat' is the name of the substance in which the body stores its power reserves?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He probably isn't because I'm not, and I've been speaking it almost all my life. My understanding is of the meaning is more like "quality", "measure", and "skill". If your talking about power as in political power, Macht works for me, as it does for most German speaking people I know. How in the world does "kraft" fit in there? I'd really like to know, as I'll be the first to admit I don't know every thing.
Ich nenne Godwin auf diesen Thread!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Kraft {f}; Stärke {f}; Wucht {f} power
treibende Kraft moving power
mit Kraft versehend powering
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
How's that? A German speaking person, from birth, who even defines Kraft as power in the context of the cheese.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
of course you will defend yourself, with crap claims of if I never heard of them, I must not be into music and cannot appreciate them, or other such drivel to ignore a point your cannot argue with
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Huh. Most of the post talks up all the smart things many labels are doing, and you still claim I dislike them? Weird.
but you point out obscure bands no one but a handful of people have ever and will ever hear of and say the big labels should do what they do
Funny. I've explained lots of big name artists who have put these things into practice -- sometimes with and sometimes without the help of big record labels. For example, we've discussed moves by Nine Inch Nails, Mariah Carey and Lady Gaga. Obscure all of them.
And when I did that, folks like yourself insisted that those artists could do those things because they were so famous. So then we posted examples of more obscure artists putting in place similar efforts. And people like you say that it only works for them.
After one person complained that it only works for big artists and small artists, but not everyone in between, I dedicated a post to some artists in the middle area who are using these models to great success as well.
At some point, perhaps you can stop claiming things that are untrue about what I've said and start learning.
of course you will defend yourself, with crap claims of if I never heard of them, I must not be into music and cannot appreciate them, or other such drivel to ignore a point your cannot argue with
Or I'll just point out that idiotic strawmen arguments on something I have not done don't hold much weight and suggest you start over again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually the scenario is all the lifeboats are sinking. (Litterally that's the argument, you give the music away and try making money ...um ...some ...other ...way.)
Oh that guy isn't drowning as fast, let's try that ....isn't exactly a suggestion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]