Oracle's First Big Move With Sun? Use Sun's Patents To Sue Google
from the real-companies-innovate,-not-litigate dept
Over the past few years, Sun has been one of the more outspoken companies against abusing the patent system, with former CEO Jonathan Schwartz explaining that real companies innovate, not litigate. However, Sun and its patents are now owned by Oracle, and apparently Larry Ellison feels otherwise. Oracle is now suing Google for patent infringement, using a bunch of patents that Sun owns around Java, claiming that Google's Android implementation of Java is done without a license. This is a bit surprising, really, as big Silicon Valley tech companies don't often get into patent battles with each other -- and, historically, when they do launch such patent attacks, it's usually a sign of something bigger being wrong with the company. Anyway, if you're interested, the patents in question are 6,125,447, 6,192,476, 5,966,702, 7,426,720, RE38,104, 6,910,205 and 6,061,520. And here's the filing:Either way it will be interesting to see Google's response. Unlike many big tech companies, Google hasn't warehoused patents at quite the same rate. The company certainly does regularly apply for and get patents, but if you watch the numbers, they're much lower than other tech companies, and I can't recall Google ever making a patent claim against another company. So it'll be interesting if Google responds with the standard response to a patent lawsuit between two big tech companies: which is to countersue over other patents, effectively launching the nuclear counterstrike. My guess is that the more likely response is that Google will eventually just pay off Oracle to make this lawsuit go away.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: java, patents, sdk
Companies: google, oracle, sun
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Okay, it has to be said...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You know what they say about Microsoft... if you can't beat 'em, join 'em!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oracle's action raises serious questions, also about certain organizations
One thing I hope we'll find out soon is whether Oracle would have been willing to do a license deal with Google on reasonable terms or not. So far there's no indication that Oracle was constructive.
This also raises serious questions about the Open Invention Network, given that one of its licensees now sues another over a Linux distribution although the OIN claims to protect Linux against patents, and the OpenForum Europe, an open standards lobby organization. I raised those issues (and some related ones) in this blog posting.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Future JAVA developement
How the hell will a JAVA developer know when they are potentially infringing on a non-open sourced piece of code? Will a lawyer have to do a code review now?
The pretense of JAVA is that it open source (FREE). But now there are some exceptions. This will add another layer of risk to the development of JAVA - one many commerical business do not have the capital resources to fight Oracle over.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dumb on so many levels
Before we have the mistaken reference to the old Microsoft vs. Sun Java lawsuit, this isn't anything like that. MS vs Sun was about MS breaking their license agreement and corrupting Java with MS Java that only ran well on Windows. Google vs Oracle is about Google making a non Java virtual machine (not a JVM) that translates Java byte codes to Dalvik byte codes, that run in their own virtual machine. You can write code in a Java like syntax (the language) and have it converted to Dalvik to run under Android.
They don't call it Java, they don't have a license agreement with Oracle about Java, and their Java to Dalvik converter is all Google code. The Java/Dalvik editor is based off of the Apache licensed Harmony project (which neither Sun, nor Oracle is very happy even exists).
So in the end it's nothing like the Microsoft vs. Sun suit of yesteryear. It's Oracle upset that Google has routed around their lucrative Java Mobile licensing by out developing them. If you were unaware, Sun's official Java test suite comes with field of use restrictions that keep it limited to the desktop space. If you certified your open source Java JVM to comply, you can't use it on servers or mobile devices (or anything else for that matter like TV set top boxes). For anything else you have to pay Oracle a license fee. It's these field of use restrictions (among other reasons) that has kept the Harmony project from certifying their project as "Official Java".
As for Boies and company, at least Oracle should be able to afford their legal bills, unlike new SCO.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Something wrong
Second, the signs are plentiful that something went horribly wrong inside Oracle after the Sun acquisition. Ellison publicly bashed Schwartz for everything under the sun
then went on about how to recoup those losses. I took that to mean that, the strategy they had planned with sun's assets failed and that they have buyers remorse. Also, all of the rock star talent left after the acquisition and the O was left with lots of OSS and the third largest idea patent portfolio. I suppose this is how they plan to recoup that money. What a shame....
BTW: take a look at the ironic text showing up in the Google ad box:
"How To Patent Your Idea 3 Easy Steps To Patent & Make Money Get A Free Patent & Invention Kit" www.Patent.InventionHome.com
Is this RJR's business?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The stupidity of it all
I read all this this morning on my Nexus 1.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The stupidity of it all
[ link to this | view in thread ]
! =Innovation
[ link to this | view in thread ]
C/C++, LUA and python are better alternatives in that order.
ps:
In 1997 Sun sued Microsoft over this same issue and apparently won that case.
http://www3.wcl.american.edu/cni/9710/14591.html
In 2002 again Sun sued Microsoft over the same issue.
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Application-Development/Sun-Sues-Microsoft-Over-Java/
The issue being the use of non standard classes in JAVA(I think didn't bother to read all the complaints and find those old fillings to confirm).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Future JAVA developement
The specific claims seem like the typical ridiculously general software patent claims--nothing Java specific at all. (Is inducement typically featured so heavily in these types of filings? Or is that just because we're talking about a SDK?)
As I understand it, the main danger for Google is that they're distributing a JVM (virtual machine) that is not a complete implementation of the Java specifications. I.e., it's not *really* "Java" -- which could potentially invalidate Sun's fairly liberal license agreement. Sun wanted to make sure that no one else tried Microsoft's embrace-extend-extinguish ploy that nearly killed Java in the early days. So... Oracle might have a leg to stand on here, however evil.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Future JAVA developement
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-10-1997/jw-10-lawsuit.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: ! =Innovation
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Sadly this kinda crud is nothing new for Oracle.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Future JAVA developement
Google is not distributing a JVM (Java virtual machine). They are distributing a DVM (Dalvik virtual machine).
Google isn't claiming that Dalvik is Java. Therefore they aren't trying a Microsoft's embrace-extend-extinguish ploy. Since Dalvik isn't Java they didn't have to write a complete implementation of the Java specifications. Google doesn't have to worry about breaking a Google/Oracle Java licensing agreement because there isn't a Google/Oracle Java licensing agreement and one wasn't needed because they didn't write a JVM nor are they claiming that they did.
Repeat after me: "Dalvik isn't Java, Dalvik isn't Java, Dalvik isn't Java"
What Dalvik does is allow you to write programs using a Java syntax that gets compiled to Java byte codes using the Harmony project (Apache licensed). These Javaish program then get recompiled (the byte codes translated) into Dalvik byte codes. Dalvik is what runs on Android.
Therefore, unless they win based on bogus software patents (in my opinion all software patents are bogus), they don't ".. have a leg to stand in here, however evil."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This thread...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Totally crap-tastic!
I took to C# like a fish to water, though. Being designed by the creator of Turbo-Pascal, I found it to be very intelligently designed and easy to understand.
I was unhappy, however, that Microsoft was holding it so tightly. I looked at Mono, an open source implementation, and got excited. Then I read about how patent-encumbered Mono is, and how everyone who thinks about developing in a modern language should use Java(Blech) since it's GPL'ed.
Then I read about this. I got excited because Google has the means to create it's own open-source, patent-unencumbered language and platform. Then I read that they did: this isn't Java, this is a Java-like language (C#, anyone?) which uses a Dalvik virtual machine.
I hope that Google can say to every patent, "No, we don't do it that way." I wish they would take Oracle to task on software patents, and have them abolished. But since it's cheaper to just pay up than to do what's right...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It'll be interesting
You're supposed to make that attempt, or some attempt, to resolve the issue without launching this kind of suit. You don't go to court first.
Google buckling under because it costs less wouldn't be a good thing but then again they sold their soul as they sold the rest of us out when they released their cozy deal with Verizon so anything is possible now from the former "do no evil" company.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Totally crap-tastic!
AND Platform??? NO. No no no no no no. No more platforms. The whole point behind Java was to get away from platform dependencies. Also one of the reasons behind Sun's loose licensing of Java, so that developers could start creating applications that were not so encumbered by the jungle of licensing that cripples the C#/Mono crowd. Java has a lot of things I like, as for the gui complaint, take a look at the initial version of Azureus (not the crapware current version) and get back to me. The interface is sheer joy to use. No, it wasn't the gui, nor was it the class name restriction (hardly a real issue), and I don't even mind the lack of multiple inheritance (that is really dumb in my opinion), the problem with Java is Microsoft's jealous rage that it didn't invent it first and its successful attempts to dilute it back in the late 90's. That and McNealy's lack of vision for Sun left its spectacular portfolio of intellectual property to rot away in the "sun" (as it were).
Sun was a great company. Now its been hijacked by a shark of a database vendor, a database no one really needs to use but they do anyway, and here we are. Doing Larry's lawsuit limbo. Its a real shame.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Totally crap-tastic!
-- I took to C# like a fish to water, though. --
WTF ? C# is almost identical to Java, a carbon copy.
-- Being designed by the creator of Turbo-Pascal, I found it to be very intelligently designed and easy to understand. --
Odd use of grammar here. You were designed by the creator of Turbo-Pascal ? Didn't your parents have a say ?
Or did you mean C# was designed by the creator of Turbo Pascal ? ("designed" in this case meaning "plagiarised".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Think less C# more like J#
J# to .Net is like
Java to Dalvik
In J# you are writing in a Javaish language with .Net classes/additions and the result gets translated to .Net byte codes run under the .Net VM.
In the Dalvik case you are writing in a Javaish language with some Dalvik classes/additions and the result gets translated (through Java byte codes) into Dalvik byte codes run under the DVM.
Instead of writing J# using Visual Studio (or a text editor) you are writing Harmony Java in Eclipse (or a text editor).
It's a lot closer to writing Java than to writing C#, even though C# is remarkably close to Java syntax wise. Both J# and Dalvik serve the same purpose, to leverage the Java coding skills of developers to write code that runs under the .Net VM or the Dalvik VM respectively. Admittedly using Eclipse and Harmony is more Java like than using Visual Studio, but at the end of the day it's basically the same thing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Totally crap-tastic!
Except all the ways C# is better, that is. Pointers, for example.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Java_and_C_Sharp
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Totally crap-tastic!
Oddly enough, simply being able to run a switch on strings made me quite happy when I first tried C#.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I hope this was tongue in cheek. The guy started his own firm, which gets hired to work the biggest litigation cases around.
Anyway, interesting to note that Michael Jacobs of MoFo, who represented Novell *against* SCO and Boies Schiller, is now joining forces with Boies on this suit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That's why I am totally sold to Python now. It is stupidly easy to use and has a ton of modules to do pretty much anything. If you just want to make a program that works in 10 minutes, Python is the best thing ever.
The bad part is that it is crap slow on number crunching, but you can always use a little C code to speed things up (my most favorite thing about Python), or use modules like numpy for the heavy-duty stuff.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The stupidity of it all
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I want to naively hope that Oracle didn't know this was happening....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What are they thinking?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
this type a stuff only helps the us economy
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Now I know everything
Software patents are a stupid thing. If I patent a program that uses a bubble sort, does that mean nobody else can ever use one? If my patented ERP system prints checks, will I be able to sue you if yours does? Where do we draw the line? Clearly, there is no true solution.
If Google did, indeed, violate the terms of licensing, Oracle has every right to sue, and they should, for the same reason Sun sued Microsoft. If Jilocasin is reporting correct facts (I did not research this) then reverse engineering or decompiling is, in fact, violation of the terms of use for the Java platform in addition to the scope of use clause. Oh, I smell many rats here.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Now I know everything
Oh yeah? Let's compare "Hello World!"s:
Java:
---
class Something {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Hello World!");
}
}
---
Done. Oh right, I still need to compile it. And now run it. There you go, it printed "Hello World!".
Python:
---
print "Hello World!"
---
There you go. That's it. You can make a script with that and run it or just pop it into the Python shell. Either way, same result.
By the time you finish writing hello world in Java, I already have a user interface set up in Python that runs in Windows, Linux and Mac with native look and feel (not some random one that my crappy toolkit decided on using).
If I want speed on Python, I can use Cython, Psyco or (if I am a nut, which I am) make a Python class/module/whatever in C and get the ease of use of Python plus the speed of C.
Watch out Java boy. In the future, YOU are the one that might end up shoveling elephant crap if you continue to cling so hard to your obsolete (soon to be patent bloated) language.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Languages With A Future
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Totally crap-tastic!
Why not use Python? Seems like you'd get the best of both worlds. It is object orientated if you want it and a completely open language that is fun to use. You can even use it for phone dev on the Maemo/Meego platforms (though it is not officially supported).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dangerous game
Oracle's flagship product is their relational database, the first version of which they shipped in 1979. However, the bulk of the patents on relational database technology were held by IBM; if IBM had chosen to be dicks about it, they could have squashed the nascent Oracle like a bug.
Fast forward 30 years and the biggest player in the Java space after Sun is... IBM (in fact, IBM has probably made more money out of Java than Sun ever have). Given the size of IBM's patent portfolio and if they got spooked about the potentially chilling effect on the Java ecosystem that this litigation might have, they could make things very uncomfortable for Oracle.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oracle will be cursed!!! OK, I can't help it!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Future JAVA developement
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Okay, it has to be said...
Patent system under attack!
[ link to this | view in thread ]