If Your Ad Claims 'Save More Every Time You Shop,' Does That Need To Be True?

The Need For Anti-SLAPP Laws: Developer Sues Author, Publisher, Academic Who Praised Book & Reporter That Reviewed Book

from the lawsuit-bender dept

Mon, Aug 16th 2010 4:49pm — Mike Masnick

We've been discussing the need for a federal anti-SLAPP law for a while, to protect people against frivolous lawsuits designed solely to get people not to speak up. Citizen Media Law Group is alerting us to a case in Texas that is calling more attention to the issue, and getting lawmakers much more interested in at least improving anti-SLAPP laws in Texas. It involves a book about a real estate project by Dallas developer H. Walker Royall, which Royall apparently did not appreciate:

When Dallas developer H. Walker Royall found out about an impending book digging into one of his projects, he went on a lawsuit bender.

He sued the author, Carla Main, and her publisher, Encounter Books. He sued Richard Epstein -- the prominent libertarian academic -- for a blurb he wrote praising the book. He sued Mark Lardas, who reviewed the book, and the Galveston County Daily News for publishing the review.

Uh, yeah. As someone who has blurbed a couple of books, that seems ridiculous. Suing the person who writes a blurb for the book, or a review of the book, claiming that they're somehow responsible? Blatantly ridiculous. The article notes that Epstein was dropped from the case for jurisdiction reasons, and Lardas and the newspaper "settled" with Royall (which seems like a bad precedent as well). However, the lawsuit against the author and the publisher is still going on, and it's drawing more attention to the need for anti-SLAPP laws.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: anti-slapp, carla main, free speech, h. walker royall, slapp, texas

11 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

out_of_the_blue, 16 Aug 2010 @ 5:50pm

The Rich use law as a bludgeon.
Too bad the libertarian is out of it. I'll hope that it changed his notions about allowing some to get filthy rich now he's found out power can be used for evil even in *private* hands.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Mighty Buzzard (profile), 16 Aug 2010 @ 6:22pm
  
  Re: The Rich use law as a bludgeon.
  Absolutely. Nobody should ever have any significant power except the state, because they've a long track record of never abusing or being corrupted by it. Oh, wait...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 16 Aug 2010 @ 7:04pm
    
    Re: Re: The Rich use law as a bludgeon.
    Look, a bicycle!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chargone (profile), 16 Aug 2010 @ 10:02pm

any source of authority too large or powerful to be overthrown by an angry mob over the weekend is untrustworthy.

those that are not are less 'trustworthy' and more 'easily replaced'

modern 'democracy's main job is to make it impossible for that to happen. It has nothing to do with representation and Everything to do with stability.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike42 (profile), 17 Aug 2010 @ 7:09am
  
  Re:
  Somebody once said, "he who would trade freedom for safety deserves neither."
  
  I'm sure in was nobody important. Camp counselor or something.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 16 Aug 2010 @ 10:37pm

I think there is no need to anti-SLAPP legislation if there was no law about defamation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Aug 2010 @ 12:56am

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_law

In most states of the Union you can be slapped by the law by calling others a "retard".

Defamation per se.

Allegations or imputations "of loathsome disease" (historically leprosy and sexually transmitted disease, now also including mental illness)

Strict liability
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_liability
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Aug 2010 @ 1:02am

Resources.
http://www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/defamation.html

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encycl opedia/article-29718.html

http://www.eff.org/issues/bloggers/legal/liability/defamation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Aug 2010 @ 1:21am

How can we reduce the law footprint in our life's?

That is the question I most want answered, I feel the law is an enabler of bad behavior, a threat to society and freedom.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Aug 2010 @ 4:18am

Simple
Individually sue H. Walker Royall for violating their First Admendment Rights. A sum of one billion dollars each should do it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
JC, 17 Aug 2010 @ 5:55am

Ahh, those bastions of freedom, newspapers ...

The first to fold in what would probably be considered a first amendment case. Wow, I hope we can find a way to save all these pieces of $&#@.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]