How Should Facebook Respond To The Social Network Movie?

from the tread-carefully dept

Tue, Aug 24th 2010 2:42pm — Mike Masnick

As you probably know by now, there's a movie coming out this fall, called Social Network, which is sorta, kinda, maybe an extremely fictionalized version of the story behind Facebook. It was based on a book by Ben Mezrich, which was already a fictionalized account of the founding of Facebook -- based on notes from a disgruntled co-founder, with Mezrich taking significant creative license to fill in lots of blanks. Then, famed writer Aaron Sorkin wrote the script, passing it through a second fictionalized filter. And, not surprisingly, the folks at Facebook are not at all pleased with the movie, which doesn't exactly portray Mark Zuckerberg or Facebook in a very nice light.

Apparently Facebook execs are debating what to do about the movie, and it's almost surprising that they haven't tried to take legal action -- because that's almost what you'd expect these days. Of course, they probably realize that doing so will only get the movie more attention (though, it certainly looks like the movie is going to get plenty of attention already). Yet in an age where "publicity rights" lawsuits are becoming more common and many movie makers feel they need to secure the rights of anyone and any company that shows up in a film, it's actually somewhat surprising that this particular film actually was made.

But given that Facebook execs are trying to figure out what to do about the film and how to respond to it, I'm curious what folks here think. I think I would go with the simplest of all solutions: a single page that explains why the movie is a greatly fictionalized account, and not an accurate depiction of either the company or its employees, past or current, and then just stay quiet otherwise. What else would you suggest?

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: aaron sorkin, facebook, mark zuckerberg, movies, social network
Companies: facebook

37 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Jon Renaut (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 1:46pm

Facebook the Movie
They should throw together a competing movie telling the real story. We'd see Zuckerberg in a flowing white robe, handing out hot meals to homeless children with a big smile on his face. We'd see the teenage girl saved from a suicide attempt by the friends she made playing Farmville. We'd see a couple, reunited after 20 years through a mutual friend using Facebook's Friend Finder, and we'd watch bits of their spectacular wedding.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- :Lobo Santo (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 2:48pm
  
  Re: Facebook the Movie
  ... And then, as they ride off into the sunset--just barely escaping the homicidal exploding bear--they both say a gracious thanks to the Lord that such a person as Mark Zuckerberg and his marvelous FaceBook exist.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 24 Aug 2010 @ 6:34pm
    
    Re: Re: Facebook the Movie
    "They should throw together a competing movie telling the real story."
    
    Or they can retaliate and put together a non-fictional movie about how corrupt Hollywood is and how they scam everyone.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 24 Aug 2010 @ 6:37pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Facebook the Movie
      and they can host it on Facebook's homepage and make it available for free. Lots of people will watch it. That will make Hollywood think twice before ever doing something like this again.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Simon, 24 Aug 2010 @ 3:06pm

Sue them... ...in Federal court.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Brendan (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 10:04pm
  
  Re:
  Federal pound-me-in-the-ass court?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 25 Aug 2010 @ 9:20am
    
    Re: Re:
    More of a white-collar resort court, really.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pierre Wolff (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 3:10pm

As with these sorts of fictionalized accounts, so long as they draw close to any real life event people can anchor to, viewers tend to believe more of the story as being true than not. FB may be in a pickle here, but I totally agree w/the "the less said, the better" mantra as they stand to gain nothing fm contributing to the story in any way. The bigger question is whether we will see political grandstanding fm the various states' attorneys general showing that they will take action against FB for activities fictionalized in the movie ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jay (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 3:17pm

Let's remember, this is Hollywood.
Hollywood is full of BS. "Hackers" didn't get the hacking scene portrayed even close to legitimately, "The Net" (Bill Gates) was full of holes even though it's a great parody about him and his "creativity" in the Microsoft heyday. Quite frankly, it's fiction. Enjoy it for what it is but don't think this story is by any means true when there's more sides to what was happening as FB rose than can be told.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
reboog711 (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 3:23pm

Do Nothing?
How about nothing? Why do they need to even acknowledge the movie?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Malodorous Intent (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 3:39pm

Scoop the movie
There isn't much time left, but they should try to scoop the movie just before it comes out. I'm talking lots of interviews telling the "true" (i.e. spun) story of facebook's beginnings, leaks of real dirty secrets that conflict with the movie's storyline, and a public apology from Mark Zuckerberg for not being as interesting as the movie portrays him to be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Bapzzy (profile), 25 Aug 2010 @ 6:02am
  
  Re: Scoop the movie
  That sounds like a winner.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ron Rezendes (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 3:57pm

Really?
Ok just because it seems so relevant here in TD-land let's try this:
FB could try to get the movie out on the torrent sites before release just to wipe out any hope of the movie being successful - because Hollywood is always crying about the internet - they can't make any money because of all the pirates. Well of course the movie will do just fine but FB will have helped prove lots of points made frequently here on TD.

@Pierre - nice post - almost spit coffee on my screen reading it!

Honestly, they should just stay quiet and post a minimal response to the movie in a blog format emphasizing that the movie is a work of fiction and that of course we'd love to have you here on FB so you can see for yourself.

or

Make the movie work FOR you even if it's not scripted as such. Offer discount tickets to the movie by working on a promotional campaign with the studio. How ironic would that be to have FB offer the discount AND possibly pick up even more customers on a movie that makes fun of them - that is marketing genius right there!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Whisk33, 25 Aug 2010 @ 5:32am
  
  Re: Really?
  Hollywood thinks torrents are bad, the tech world describes it as free advertising. Releasing it on torrents would therefore help promote the movie. I don't know if that was your point since the conclusion Hollywood would have is that the film succeeded inspite of the torrents and techies would say it succeeded because of the torrents and we would be right where we are not. And FB would have some additional legal liabilities...
  
  I like your last point. No such thing as bad media. I would think that finding a way to capitalize on all the fresh attention... mock it slightly by playing up the bad guy while implying there is more to the story and ignoring any aspects that you don't want to address...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Aug 2010 @ 3:57pm

With the sound of a mallet.

"All rise!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DV Henkel-Wallace (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 4:13pm

Create a page
Clearly they should create a Facebook group for "Social Network" which is a generic term....and use it to poison the well!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lavi d (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 4:18pm

Alors!
I think I would go with the simplest of all solutions: a single page that explains why the movie is a greatly fictionalized account, and not an accurate depiction of either the company or its employees, past or current...

What? There's a Techdirt movie???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hazama, 24 Aug 2010 @ 4:33pm

"The Net"... or maybe you meant
... Pirates of Silicon Valley? :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Eugene (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 4:44pm
  
  Re: "The Net"... or maybe you meant
  I was thinking the exact same thing. I don't think either Jobs or Bill Gates ever directly commented on the film, did they?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Aug 2010 @ 4:59pm

Wait till the movie comes out. If the movie is critical of Facebook sue them for defamation. If it's favorable, sue them for infringement. If it's neither, sue them for both.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Aug 2010 @ 5:13pm

Learn from Nazi Moderator
They need to pull a "Springtime For Hitler".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 24 Aug 2010 @ 5:14pm
  
  Re: Learn from Nazi Moderator
  Or they can do one of those Hitler parodies. Imagine the Facebook exec dressed up as Hitler forecasting how he will take over the world. Then when he discovers this movie is going to be released ...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ofb2632 (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 6:38pm

They should come out and critique the movie. If it was amusing or funny, they should say so. Taking that stance is always the best way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brock Phillimore (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 7:18pm

I agree with Mike. A simple page on their web site stating which facts they got wrong. If they want to include any commentary other than the facts it should be humours. If it was done write that single page could get more press than the movie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Adam Wasserman (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 8:09pm

There is no such thing as bad publicity...

Brendan Behan
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nick Coghlan (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 8:59pm

FB and Zuckerberg aren't dumb enough to feed the Streisand Effect. If they do anything to try to get the movie shut down, it will just make people wonder what they're trying to hide. Given the stuff Zuckerberg has gone on record as saying, anything FB tried to legally suppress would raise a lot of red flags for people.

A single page somewhere on their website, along with a standard press release to say "hey, look at us, see how reasonable and tolerant we're being?", is probably their best bet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lisae Boucher (profile), 24 Aug 2010 @ 11:42pm

It generates additional publicity for Facebook, so that's not bad. It makes Facebook look bad, though, which is bad. I can understand them avoiding the Streisand effect with this movie, though.
I think it's a matter of the opinions from the critics. There are plenty of movies created every year and this movie seems to be one which will soon disappear from movie theaters to be sold in the discount section of any random DVD shop. It's not worth much attention and the publicity it generates isn't all bad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
drm made me into a pirate (profile), 25 Aug 2010 @ 1:39am

unless it illustrates the evils of DATA MINING
.. the movie is of no consequence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chucklebutte (profile), 25 Aug 2010 @ 4:58am

Relish in it!
Make a movie about me, good or bad, and I will be the sponge sucking up all the attention from it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Danny, 25 Aug 2010 @ 5:57am

My money says they are waiting for the movie to release and then they will gauge public response then act accordingly. If the its popular then FB will latch onto it. If it flops they will try to play that to their advantage (possibly by release a true story like others here have said). Either way we probably won't hear much out of FB on this movie until the movie actually releases.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bapzzy (profile), 25 Aug 2010 @ 6:07am

Script Writers Lament
Make a fictional movie with an Aaron Sorkin character who mangles great books with fictional scripts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Michael, 25 Aug 2010 @ 6:52am

Why fight this?
I would try to get the filmmakers to use the names FaceBook and Mark Zuckerberg in the movie. Let it be wrong, but let them use the names all they want. Does anyone really think movie are a real depiction of anything these days?

Start with a frame that says something like "by some people's accounts, this may have actually happened..." and let them trash you all they want. Everyone will remember that this is a movie, and they will be highly impressed by you letting it happen or even helping it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
known coward, 25 Aug 2010 @ 12:25pm

Mexican Drug Lords
Since it is not zuckerberg's company anyway with what's his name really owning some 84% of the company. If I were him, I would hire mexican drug lords to suggest either A not to make the movie, or B. have all shots showing zuckerberg have him appear in a while flowing robe handing out food to starving children, even the sex scenes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Aug 2010 @ 12:47pm

Request to be invited to the initial screening of the movie. Afterward he will be interview by the movie reviewers where he will say it was an entertaining movie but not accurate. He will come off as better and will still get a quote on probably most of the movie reviews saying this isn't the true story of facebook.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gene Cavanaugh, 25 Aug 2010 @ 2:56pm

Facebook and bias
Excellent article, Mike. I would add that, if it makes sense, they should point out some of the stuff floating around now, and how this seems to fit - examples, "Obama is a Muslim" (he's not, of course), or Glen Beck's assertion that "any Church with a social program (so, all Christian Churches) is communist".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- nasch (profile), 26 Aug 2010 @ 8:21am
  
  Re: Facebook and bias
  Wait, you're saying Glen Beck is secretly a Muslim? Wow, I had no idea!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Michael, 26 Aug 2010 @ 12:17pm

Ben Mezrich Speech at Cisco Live
I attended CiscoLive event in Vegas June 27th to July 1st

Ben Mezrich was a guest speaker on the July 1st Keynote.

He talked about his book "The Accidental Billionaires" and the movie it was being made into. An interesting thing he mention there is that he asked Mark Zuckerberg for his side of the story. He ultimately didn't get any input from Mark and therefore he had only the other sides of the story to put together. He also went on to say that when he writes non-fiction he writes in the basic truth (in this case being some kids sort of accidentally developed a massive social networking website, and lots of people were/are being sued over it), but adds his own tone and flavour to make the book a better read. Hollywood of course then takes what it wants and makes it into it's own movie.

He also talked about the differences in the movie 21, and his book Bringing Down the House. To name one there isn't a big dude giving you the beat down if they catch you counting cards. But they will take you to a back room and take your pictures all in an attempt to scare you. They will eventually ban you.

Anyways the movie doesn't appeal to me at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]