Disney, WB Claim Ad Firm Working With Pirate Sites Is Guilty Of Contributory Infringement
from the a-new-mole-to-wac dept
Apparently the folks in Hollywood are trying a slightly different tactic than directly wac'ing file sharing site/service moles, and are trying to go after other third parties. Disney and Warner Bros. have sued an ad firm called Triton Media for providing advertising services to a series of sites that the studios feel facilitate copyright infringement. Note the degrees of separation here. The sites in question do not host or transmit any copyrighted material. As the legal complaint notes:Specifically, the Websites, have posted, organized, searched for, identified, collected and indexed links to infringing material that is available on third-party websites, otherwise provided access to infringing material, and/or hosted infringing material.So, the websites themselves are already pretty far removed from the actual infringement. The files are hosted on other sites. They're shared by other people. These sites just allow users to post links. And... then on top of that the studios aren't even suing these sites, which are a few steps away from the actual infringement: they're suing this ad firm, which is another degree of separation away. Wow.
The complaint itself is pretty stunning too when you realize that it never actually shows what Triton did that would qualify as contributory infringement. It just focuses on these nine websites instead. Perhaps there's more to this lawsuit than is in the filing, but it seems like a huge reach. If advertising firms are liable for infringement that happens on a totally different website than the one they're working with because someone clicked a link... that seems like it could create massive liability for anyone offering services on any website.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: advertising, contributory infringement, copyright
Companies: disney, triton media, warner bros.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's highly unlikely that any of these cases will win. But at least the lawyers won't go hungry, and their kids won't run out of caviar this weekend at the beach house.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually, that sounds like fun. Kevin Bacon stars in a movie that gets pirated, therefore sue Kevin Bacon for enabling piracy. It's just crazy enough to backfire catastrophically!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Precedent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Precedent
"After all," stated their lawyer, "without the direct assistance of WB/Disney it would be impossible for thieving pirates to infringe the copyrighted works of WB/Disney."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would hate to be defending them
What about an ad agency that pushed illlegal items like crack cocaine? What about a place advertising hit men?
At some point the ad agency becomes complicit and given that Pirate Bay uses piracy as a selling point, well, I think it be hard for them to say that they're just helping people finding Linux Distros.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I would hate to be defending them
They must be guilty of contributing to the actual crime, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I would hate to be defending them
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I would hate to be defending them
2) rinse
3) repeat
4) ???
5) profit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Subject
This of course will set a precedence allowing them to win against every other ad company they go after.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Subject
Forgive me, but do default judgments count as precedent for anything other than default judgments?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Subject
> anything other than default judgments?
No, they do not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Method in the madness
Of course, we all know that the final effect of this strategy will not be what they expect...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Method in the madness
Therein lies the rub ...
Everyone in the entertainment industries is trying to blame everyone else for their problems. They dont blame stupid business decisions, or lack of business sense. They blame and sue everyone that doesnt agree with them. The problem with that strategy is you piss off everyone it tends to come back an haunt you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Irony...
So why aren't they going after themselves?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let's say that someone (not me, of course--I would never consider such a thing...) got injured at Disneyland and decided, after consultation with legal counsel, decided to sue. Not Disney, mind you, but all the various corporate enterprises with which they do business.
I'm sure that between all of the marketers, toy and merchandise manufacturers, stores that sell their products, movie theatres, etc., this person (who is not me) would rake in a lot of cash ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H receive a proper settlement for physical damages and emotional stress.
And friends, somewhere in the Disney vaults enshrined in some little folder, will be a study in black and white of my lawsuit.
And the only reason I'm telling you this now is 'cause you may know somebody in a similar situation, or you may be in a similar situation, and if your in a situation like that there's only one thing you can do and that's walk into Disneyland, just walk in say "Mickey, I can get anything I want, by suing your business partners." And walk out.
You know, if one person, just one person does it they may think he's really sick and they won't let him in.
And if two people, two people do it, in harmony,
they may think they're both faggots and they won't let either of them in.
And three people do it, three, can you imagine, three people walking in singing it and walking out? They may think it's an organization.
And can you, can you imagine fifty people a day, I said fifty people a day walking in singing it and walking out. And friends they may thinks it's a movement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Triton Media
Well, it turns out Triton has a lot of irons in the fire. They make software to add "pre-roll" commercials to streaming videos, and "drop in" advertisements into streaming audio. They also have a commercial CMS for media sites.
But they don't create advertisements, and are not an ad agency.
They're not limited to digital, and here's where things get interesting. Triton also owns Dial Global, which (according to their web site) is "an independent, full-service radio network, offering formats, prep, programming, jingles & imaging as well as national advertising sales representation." They also (through TM Studios) provide music for jingles and such.
In other words, they're a competitor to Warner and Disney. And I'm guessing that's the real reason they're being sued.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
i think i need a crack pipe to follow hollywood logic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
irony in this...
and the content makes me angry again...and especially Disney looses every credibility for me, because, and now, please get this right and understand its ironic: Disney at one point in time had adds on our mainsite!!!
what the .... is there really anybody out there who still believes in this lie of the big companies loosing money? i laugh about that, and it makes me angry. this is just another wrong pleaded cause by the so called new team of big companies to even get more money.
by the way, our forum is still alive and its growing! Check it out http://www.ninjavideoforum.net and join the movement!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]