Is Paul Allen's Patent Madness Really An Attempt To Show The Madness Of Patents?
from the seems-unlikely dept
Last week, in writing about Paul Allen's decision to sue (nearly) every big tech company south of Seattle (notably absent: Microsoft and Amazon), I had seen a few people suggest that maybe Allen was doing this to prove how ridiculous the patent system is. Larry Downes is now exploring that option in a blog post on his site:Maybe Allen is not the world's most famous patent troll. Maybe he's out to become the world's most famous patent reformer. Maybe he doesn't want so much to win as to publicize how dangerous his patents are.I don't buy it. There are, obviously, lots of ways to go about pushing for patent reform, but dragging a bunch of companies and yourself through the court system seems like one of the least effective ways to go about doing so. Even if it does call attention to ridiculous patents and how they're used to punish companies who actually innovate, the message is so likely to be lost that I would imagine the chance for any such strategy to succeed is outweighed by the far greater likelihood that the strategy will backfire and actually be seen as a reason to support patents.
Perhaps in asserting these patents, with their potential to unsettle so much of what is taken as settled business practices in the digital economy, he hopes to force leading tech companies and Congress to acknowledge that the system is broken and fix it. If he wins, or even if he just wears down the other side, perhaps he'll demand not financial tribute but actual reform of a system that gives patent holders like him the power to disrupt digital life.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: patent reform, patents, paul allen
Companies: interval
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
And I have this nice looking rustic bridge with spectacular views of Manhattan and Brooklyn I'm looking to sell cheap!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I personally think that's BS and there's just a lot of unnecessary lawyering going on in the world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just a warning to Apple and the others
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just a warning to Apple and the others
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But then Occam's razor suggests that such an explanation is far too complex, so maybe he's just a patent troll.
But then we're assuming malice, which comes into conflict with Hanlon's razor.
My head hurts. Probably because it's full of razors.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Paul Allen is not that guy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Businesses are not human entities. They don't reason. They don't respond to reason.
The way to cause reform is to hurt Businesses hard enough that they would seek out alternative or reforms.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Uh no...
This is simply a cash grab by an a business dilettante who has failed at nearly everything since leaving Microsoft.
He has lost a pile of cash. This looks like a straight forward cash grab.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Uh huh.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Smear Campaign
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How so? How can the strategy possibly encourage anyone, besides the lawyers and patent trolls, to support patents?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Downes's idiocy is an attempt to outlaw idiots.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
yeah
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: yeah
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
but I just can't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
it’s still a pig
Patent reform is a fraud on America. It is patently un-American.
Please see http://truereform.piausa.org/ for a different/opposing view on patent reform.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: it�s still a pig
This is indeed true. And despite the multiple times you accuse us of supporting the current reform bill, we have explained to you that we don't support it.
But, simple question: are you claiming that *any* reforms at all are fraud? Are you really suggesting the system is perfect as it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: it�s still a pig
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Honestly, let the patent nuclear armageddon come. Maybe that will finally make everyone who says "patents = innovation" shut up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]