If You Have To Tweet About Me Before I Give You Content, Will You Still Respect Me In The Morning?
from the not-realy-a-strong-endorsement dept
A couple months back, we discussed the growing trend of some content creators to require some sort of promotion in exchange for "free" content -- such as "tweet about our album and you can download a song." Apparently, such practices are becoming more common place, with a whole company being built around the concept. However, just like I wrote when we first discussed this, these sorts of requirements seem like fake word of mouth marketing, unlikely to drive any sort of sustained interest. That's because you're requiring people to promote you just to get your content, rather than giving them the content and having it be awesome enough that they actually want to tell their friends about it. It basically gets the equation backwards, and in the process, seems to suggest that the content in question really isn't that good. After all, if you have to force people to promote you before you'll give them content for free, it sounds like you don't think they'd want to promote you after they got it. I can see why people would jump on this kind of bandwagon, but I think that those who do should consider the possible negative signals it gives off.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: authenticity, word of mouth
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I promote Nina Paley every chance I get why?
Because I love those little funny cartoons of hers.
I promote a lot of other stuff because I like those and nobody pays me to do it.
Now would I agree to promote some dude to get something from him? only if he also gives me health plan, dental and a salary and I don't think I would do a good job even then, because I don't really believe in it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Isn't it considered good luck if a bird drops poop on you?
You just don't want to admit that this company is on the cusp of great, positively charged PR.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Isn't it considered good luck if a bird drops poop on you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think that's the crux of the matter. The label/studio/publisher system is entirely based on getting a bunch of artists who are "good enough" and promoting the hell out of them by any means possible, including artificial "word of mouth" hyping.
The problem with that, apart from the obvious fact that a lot of people are fooled and end up consuming content that isn't very good, is that the natural word of mouth is buried under the labels' fake marketing. This leads good music to be overlooked, because it doesn't manage to spread very far.
P2P/internet content discovery is starting to override this system, letting people make up their own minds, which is brilliant. The publishers aren't very happy with that, of course, because the guarantees of return on their marketing investments are being eroded.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cee-lo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dating
"Promote me to all of your girlfriends and I'll give you some for free"...
On a serious note, isn't most marketing the same thing when you get right down to it? "Hey, this is the best thing ever. Buy it. Oh my God, everyone needs this!" The difference here is this type of marketing is free, which is great if it works.
Hopefully Techdirt will have a follow-up article to see how this one pans out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dating
That's kinda the point here; this flips that and *requires* you recommend if *before* you can consume it. In this case, you can hock any product you want and get people to market it for you, albeit not very efficiently (ie, seeing a bunch of canned tweets about something isn't very convincing of its quality).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Going to live in the woods...
I've always felt somewhat uneasy with this type of faux evangelicalism, and explaining to my clients why this isn't the most transparent method of spreading the word has been difficult to articulate.
This is why people view the social web differently than reading mainstream publications. I want to be able to trust that my peers are only promoting content that they support sharing, not receive incentive to do so. Blurring the lines between legitimacy and advertising is what this is, and we don't need any more of that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I despise the idea
I don't have a large number of followers and I'm not going to lose half of them because I'm seen as a spammer. If I like something, I'll tell people about it.
The whole idea sits badly with me too, Mike.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
However, I wonder if there would be a market for asking people to bash your competition before they give you a product. I feel like people would probably be more willing to do that. It would just as ridiculous, of course, be kinda of interesting to see happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
grey area at best
now the cases mentioned in the comments and what it alluded to in the article, sounds like a much more contrived situation. tweeting to get a coupon at burger king doesnt seem right - tweeting that you just ate burger king seems ok to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: grey area at best
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Crass behaviour is crass behaviour, regardless of the source
People don't really tolerate this from their friends. Why would they just swallow it from some corporation? No way. Just another slanted bargain with lipstick on it, this initiative is as doomed as a 'friendship' that is based on pure self-interest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]