Groups Still Slamming Craigslist
from the you're-not-helping dept
Even with Craigslist censoring itself due to ridiculous public pressure, and even though it's pretty clear that this action will only make things much worse for victims, the so-called "public interest groups" that pushed this misguided media campaign against Craigslist still don't think they've done enough damage. They sent me press releases three times yesterday patting themselves on the back for Craigslist censoring itself and then demanding that it do even more. This is unfortunate, no matter how you look at it. These groups can't seem to admit that blaming the tool rather than the actual people involved only makes the problem worse. Their inability to recognize the basic consequences of moving this activity to other forums that don't cooperate with law enforcement and make it much harder to stop these activities is really quite upsetting. Blaming the tool providers for the actions of users doesn't stop the actions, at all. It just makes it that much harder to do anything. People patting themselves on the back for getting Craigslist to censor itself are worsening the problem they think they're solving.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: grandstanding
Companies: craigslist
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It's Logical
Since organisations typically want to preserve the problem they were set up to solve, this seems like perfectly reasonable behaviour.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's Logical
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's Logical
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's Logical
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's Logical
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's Logical
They have an incentive to cure life threatening diseases (the dead can't pay) - but not niggling chronic diseases.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Strange.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Strange.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Typical
It doesn't matter which subject it is, if a politician doesn't like an action, they go for the tool of said action without it affecting anything. In this case and the gun case, this only hurts law abiding citizens, very similarly to DRM. It's a vicious circle of political grandstanding.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Typical
Or find another weapon. Knives, bombs, bats, etc... can be nearly as fatal as guns.
It doesn't matter which subject it is, if a politician doesn't like an action, they go for the tool of said action without it affecting anything.
Its just as someone said above. If you play your cards right its much more profitable to fight a problem that never dies than one that that does die.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Typical
Which is why I don't think a cure for cancer is coming anytime soon. At least not a real one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The reason...
On the other hand, if you think it's abhorrent that anyone on the planet should be making money off of the exploitation of women and/or children, then shutting down the Adult Services section of CL makes more sense (I think). Isn't it fact that CL is making good money off of that section? And isn't it also fact that a majority of the ads in that section are for some form of prostitution?
So....how is it right to keep that section up and running?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The reason...
Change "exploitation of women and/or children" to "copyright infringement" and change "Craigslist" to "The Pirate Bay".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The reason...
Are you making the same argument for the exploitation of women/children?
Having said all that, somebody helpfully pointed out that CL was forced into charging for the AS section by these same asshats and donated some or all of that money to charity, so my original argument now holds no water. It's just like their being on the streets and getting mad at the city for having streets to begin with....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: The reason...
I didn't mean to imply that infringement and exploitation were the same, I was aiming more at the fact that CL and TPB are just tools that can be used *both* within and outside the law on a per user basis. So, blaming CL because some people use their service to break the law is a logic fail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: The reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The reason...
And now we're back to prostitutes....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The reason...
Angry Dude....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The reason...
Angry Dude....
After cleaning the soda off my LCD, I have to differ with you father. George Carlin described a scenario where AD could be used for an illegal purpose: Grab him by the ankles, swing him around and use him to beat another troll to death.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The reason...
"A duck!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: The reason...
the point is that this stuff just isn't based on logic at all. the reality is that these websites are simply convenient targets that are easy to identify rather than having tactical significance to an effort to stem bad behavior.
human trafficking and other forms of exploitation are these shadowy things that we don't understand, but everyone knows what craig's list is, so lets all rail against that instead of doing something constructive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The reason...
It is also a fact that after they were forced into charging people to post in the Adult section by a dipshit AG they made alot more money. Which pisses off the AG and now they are going further.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The reason...
Your argument feels like one ppl use against gay marriage. Just because someone or a group of people don't like it and they believe it to be wrong doesn't mean they have the right to bully their opinions onto others.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The reason...
I don't understand this pov, in fact I think its pretty stupid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: The reason...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: The reason...
And I thought you already admitted the situation is not exactly that. CL was MADE to charge for the service and now it's somehow their fault for doing so? If they wanted to "stop" profiting, may be they should not require the payment... besides, people that are perpetrating the crimes are still profiting and the core problem has not even been touched. So again, waste of time and money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: The reason...
I cannot see how it matters that Craiglist knowingly profit from exploitation unless they are involved or encouraging it. If they were not profiting from exploitation then the money would stay with those actually exploiting and presumably be used for no better purpose. It seems like a faux moral dilemma that diverts from the relevant question, which would appear to be whether the censorship prevents exploitation.
Rigorously applied, the faux dilemma would result in businesses being required to not provide any service that may be knowingly used by a criminal. Selling knives? Not if you haven't vetted everyone to make sure that they have a legitimate use for one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the radio today...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Blame Game
; P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spreading to Canada now
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/rcmp-wants-craigslist-to-block-erotic-ads-in-cana da/article1698949/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Spreading to Canada now
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There are really only two options, either we come to accept the darker part of human nature and learn to mitigate its harmful effects, or we give up the internet and go back to pretending our dark sides don't exist.
Allow the adult section to continue, prosecute the OFFENDERS individually if they break the law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Demonize The Tool?
Look at ETOH.
Look at Tobacco.
Look at Drugs.
Look At Automobiles.
Just about everything is demonized.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What you get....
I say ignorant because it is impossible make this world safe. There is always a way around, always a back door, always a way to circumvent these draconian measures. A good analogy is school uniforms. Supposedly this was instituted to keep rival gang members from easily identifying each other. Silly. They find a way around it. It solves nothing.
Same with this nonsense. They'll simply shift operations somewhere else. Probably there's some company in Bangkok that would be only too happy to host these ads. (It's infamous for it's prostitution) The Internet is GLOBAL. There's a dozen 3rd world countries where this junk can be hosted legally and these groups have no influence at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't impose morality on others
When I see these discussions, even though I know (and am thankful!) that prostitution could not ever be outlawed in practice, I always wonder two things:
(1) If it were possible to eliminate prostitution, and all paid sexual encounters conducted on a willing seller/willing buyer basis between adults, then how many additional male suicides per year would result? Hint: the answer is greater than zero.
Not all accept that paid sex could ever be willing on both sides, of course, and that the payment itself constitutes coercion. I understand that logic, though I disagree with it, because it leads inexorably to the conclusion that some portion of all employment is in fact slavery, and certain sections of society are only too willing to jump on the morality of forcing people to work in some capacity, even if unwilling, instead of offering support, when it comes to welfare and workfare state benefits...
(2) If it were possible to eliminate prostitution, how many innocent women would receive some additional level of male harassment they do not wish or invite, which presently is relieved, in the enforced absence of any legal alternative?
Hint: Not all of us have been able to find sexual partners in legally-approved manners, and being able to pay for company reduces that; it ties into (1) above, some of us would commit suicide rather than go crazy; but I suspect not all.
None of this is easy to say, and the morals and mores of our society mean that it isn't possible to stand up and say it, except anonymously, without incurring all kinds of other personal grief.
What I can say, however, is that the prostitutes I've encountered have all been kind to me, and that I would not have visited if I did not believe they were professional, clean, and had chosen to earn their living that way. I do not see why anyone else should interfere in that transaction, and the rise of the internet has made this very much safer and simpler for all concerned.
(posted AC for obvious reasons)
(posted AC for obvious reasons)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't impose morality on others
I do agree that prostition shouldn't be illegal and doesn't equate to exploitation in many cases.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Don't impose morality on others
I had the same initial thought, but then I stopped myself. Because he's mostly right: prostitution does not equate globally to exploitation and there are many varied reasons people partake in it.
For instance, I just returned from Vegas. Now, I was there with my girl, but even so, I was struck by how much of the fun of Vegas revolves around the fact that I was doing things I both don't normally do and personally think that I shouldn't be doing. For me, this was gambling, but there is obviously a ton of sex peddled in Vegas. I can see lot's of people partaking simply for the thrill of doing it, rather than for any "sad" reasons.
Oh, and AC, don't kill yourself. You seem reasonable and fairly intelligent....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Don't impose morality on others
I have an aquantance who goes to Vegas two or three times a year to gamble, and considering he has no sig. other, I'm pretty sure he partakes of that particular service as well. I feel a bit sad for him too. Not because I think it's wrong; just becuase that's what he has to resort to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Don't impose morality on others
It's not currently on my to-do list.
And thanks all for the responses, I wasn't asking for sympathy rather I hoped to point out there is a perspective here that "dare not speak its name" because those who have similar experiences usually also have disincentives to speak out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't impose morality on others
I can't say that I'm much less anonymous than you but I'll put my pseudonym behind your point. I concur with your entire post (and I'm a fit young guy who abstains because he doesn't mind waiting for 'the right person', so I'm unlikely to ever want to pay for sex).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Subject
It sounds like someone wants Craigslist to go under. I'd bet you anything if you followed the money trail from these "groups" it would lead right to a corporation or corporations that are either in competition or are interested in acquiring the web site for themselves.
As with any other covert operation that is being orchestrated by large corporations, the money trail is no doubt discrete and nearly impossible to track.
If I were Craigslist I'd be highly suspicious. Something does not sound or feel right at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its very obvious what this is about... VOTES
If Craigslist removes their adult section, they are vindicated. If Craigslist doesn't remove that section they can preach about how morality must be voted into office so these "out of control prostitution supporters" can be shown the right path... clearly they know better.
Sadly, Craigslist gets caught in the middle; they've done nothing wrong here. They clearly should re-institute their adult section and if paid sex ads appear, and it is illegal in your nick of the woods, then Blumenthal (and whoever else) should encourage the police departments in that area to do their job and leave this fine company alone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its the law, live with it, break it or move.
The people placing adds on CL pay for those adds, therefore CL profits from illegal activity. That is one thing, but to KNOWINGLY profit from an illegal activity is another.
Therefore once it was pointed out that they were profiting off an illegal activity they **HAD** to stop it, or they would be guilty of the much worse crime of intensional profiting off crime.
Get it ?
To say that this illegal activity will just go elsewhere is known, but it means CL is ONE LESS place they can go, making it HARDER and NOT EASIER to commit their illegal activity.
Its a totally different issue with the 'morality' of the illegal activity, and that does not play a part in this debate, what does is the LAW, you are not allowed to break the law, and you are not allowed to assist others to break the law, knowingly...
Its really very fundamental, and I must say simple.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its the law, live with it, break it or move.
Yes you are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its the law, live with it, break it or move.
Thanks for repeating a falsehood and proving that you never had any interest in a meaningful discussion.
simply put, because i want to make sure you catch on, Craigslist never made any money off any posting in the adult section. After a bushel of legal threats from varied statesmen who wanted to get publicity, CL caved and started to charge a small fee for making posts.. i am not sure what exactly this was meant to do. Something about having credit card receipts. Some of this money was used to pay ever-increasing staff to hand-screen every adult ad while more was donated through the Craigslist Foundation and related concerns.
Once this was established, many of the same mindless statesmen came back around to show how Outraged they are that CL is Profiting From These Immoral Bad People! and began the leaning process again.
written even more simply..
I Demand You Take Money For That Or Else!
How Dare You Take Money For That!
To say that this illegal activity will just go elsewhere is known, but it means CL is ONE LESS place THE POLICE can go, making it HARDER and NOT EASIER to PREVENT their illegal activity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its the law, live with it, break it or move.
So the Attorneys General using prostitution to advance their careers are criminals? Cool.
Also, your facts are all wrong, as usual.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]