Why Canada Needs Safe Harbors And An Anti-SLAPP Law Too

from the pointless-waste dept

Fri, Sep 10th 2010 5:21am — Mike Masnick

We've discussed in the past how Canadian Wayne Crookes appears to be fairly litigious in suing sites, including Google, Wikipedia, Yahoo and Myspace for hosting content he felt was defamatory. In one case, he sued P2Pnet blogger Jon Newton not for posting such content but for merely linking to such content. Unfortunately, without clear safe harbors or an anti-SLAPP law, Crookes has been able to keep the lawsuit alive. It easily lost at both the district and the appeals court levels, but rather than recognize that perhaps suing Newton isn't the best target, he's pushed forward.

Newton is pointing out that while his own lawyer is doing the work pro bono, and with lots of large companies filing briefs in his favor, it's still going to cost a fair bit of money for the trial, and so he's asking readers to help out and to raise $5,000 to help cover those costs (anything left over will go to charity). This is definitely an important case in Canada, and it's already upsetting that it's gotten this far.

If Canada had a real anti-SLAPP type law, this seems like a perfect case for it to be used -- where it would have helped Newton get the case tossed faster and easier. However, without such a law, then Newton has to go through with all of the court process, which is a huge waste of time, even with having a lawyer help out. A combination of better safe harbors and an ANTI-SLAPP law, it would seriously help others being put in such a position.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: anti-slapp, canada, defamation, linking, safe harbors

7 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

thornintheside, 10 Sep 2010 @ 5:39am

What a dick
How unCanadian can you get. Go live in the UK where they like to sue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Guillaume, 10 Sep 2010 @ 5:46am

There is one in Quebec
There is no Canada-wide anti-SLAPP law in Canada, but the provinc eof Quebec has one. It has already been used in a few cases which were clearly meant to serve as a a deterrent to silence critics.

More info : http://www.slaw.ca/2008/06/18/quebec-government-introduces-anti-slapp-legislation/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 Sep 2010 @ 6:11am

What a crooked world!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
iluvceleb, 10 Sep 2010 @ 6:21am

I just hope...
I just hope the issue will be resolved. I was thinking that ANTI-SLAPP law should also be fair to everyone who would like to express themselves. The new law shouldn't oppress the freedom of expression.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NullOp, 10 Sep 2010 @ 7:42am

Of course.....
It goes without saying anti-SLAPP laws should exist in every country. Otherwise you have the "strong" beating up the "weak". The law is supposed to level the playing field not help tilt it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MBraedley (profile), 10 Sep 2010 @ 9:19am

The Supreme Court of Canada has decided to hear the case, and will hopefully agree with the lower courts. I find it hard to believe that they wouldn't agree, as overturning the previous rulings could have a dramatic chilling effect for online free speech.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tex, 14 Sep 2010 @ 4:49am

Another SLAPP Lawsuit
Here's another SLAPP lawsuit, and Amway lost BIG TIME last month: http://texsquixtarblog.blogspot.com/2010/08/amway-lawsuit-update-dont-mess-with.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]