Judge Says Craigslist Can't Just Dilute eBay Off Its Board, But Can Keep eBay Off The Board Otherwise [Updated]

from the that's-not-how-it-works dept

Thu, Sep 9th 2010 5:09pm — Mike Masnick

We were pretty skeptical two plus years ago when the details came out concerning the lawsuit between eBay and Craigslist over Craigslist's decision to exclude an eBay representative from its board to unilaterally diluting eBay and ignoring a proposed new board member, while holding board meetings without him. As we said at the time, it's quite clear why Craigslist did what it did, but that doesn't make it legal. And, in fact, a judge has now ruled in eBay's favor, rescinding the poison pill anti-takeover rules that Craigslist's board passed without eBay present. The whole situation really is a bit of a mess, and while I think Craigslist was wrong to take the actions it took here, it does make you wonder if eBay should recognize that having a board member on Craigslist's board is too big a conflict of interest. Updated: The original coverage of this news was a bit vague, but now the details are coming out, and the report is mixed: the dilution was rolled back, so eBay still owns the larger percentage, but eBay has been kept off Craigslist's board for now...

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: competition, dilution
Companies: craigslist, ebay

7 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Koder Kev (profile), 9 Sep 2010 @ 8:32pm

Couldn't understand the headline at first.
I think the word you were looking for was "deluded," instead of "diluted." The former means "to mislead" where the latter means "to make weaker (usually by the addition of water)."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Sep 2010 @ 8:44pm
  
  Re: Couldn't understand the headline at first.
  how is that a problem?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike Masnick (profile), 9 Sep 2010 @ 8:46pm
  
  Re: Couldn't understand the headline at first.
  I think the word you were looking for was "deluded," instead of "diluted." The former means "to mislead" where the latter means "to make weaker (usually by the addition of water)."
  
  No, diluted is the right term. The existing Craigslist board effectively added more overall shares to the company, which weakened the ownership of eBay's stake from 28% to below 25%. So, it's like adding water... just that it's equity, not water.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Koder Kev (profile), 10 Sep 2010 @ 10:07am
    
    Re: Re: Couldn't understand the headline at first.
    Oh, I see. Thanks for clearing that up!
    
    Kevin
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- SomeoneInMyHeadAndItsNotMe, 10 Sep 2010 @ 4:26pm
  
  Re: Couldn't understand the headline at first.
  If you have a mixture of X and Y, you can dilute the mixture of its Y element either by increasing the X element or decreasing the Y element. In this case, ebay was the Y element, and the board was diluted of it by removal of said element. Your post makes no sense. Who was misleading whom?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Coward#2, 29 May 2011 @ 12:50am
  
  Re: Couldn't understand the headline at first.
  The headline is correct! Read a finance book.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

cocokiss, 9 Sep 2010 @ 10:12pm

chanel purses & chanel bags
Women all over the world would love to own even one bottle of Chanel perfume but hesitate due to its high price.House of Chanel, the Parisian based fashion house is the most recognized name in the world of haute couture and had its beginnings in 1909 when Coco Chanel opened her first shop.Chanel at first sold only women's clothing such as blazers, skirts.http://www.chanlesonline.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]