Pentagon Buying Up All Copies Of A Book It's Not Happy About
from the like-that-will-work dept
jake andrews points us to the news that the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) is quite upset with a new book about the war in Afghanistan by an army reservist. Even though the Army approved the book, the DIA says that it did not approve the book and that it has too much confidential information. In order to deal with that, the Pentagon has apparently agreed to buy up the 10,000 copies already printed in order to destroy them. A new version of the book, without the DIA-upsetting material will be printed later. Of course, this attempt at information destruction doesn't really seem to be working. The author has already talked about lots of stuff in the book, and review copies of the original book had already been sent to many press outlets. In other words, it's unlikely that this effort at suppression will work very well... It's tough to kill off information that's already out there.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: censorship, free speech
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Buying up the books
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Buying up the books
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Buying up the books
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is a CLEAR case for digital distribution if I've ever seen one.
1. Set up a digital sales and distribution system
2. Let the pentagon try to buy up every digital copy.
3. Profit!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm with Jim
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm with Jim
; P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Amplify to Fund Printing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The pentagon should also burn those books
The most intelligent people in history have burned books, and found that doing so is the most effective possible way of stopping the spread of undesirable ideas and information that we need to be protected from.
The pentagon's tragedy strategy of buying up the books is also infinitely scalable. They can buy books faster and in greater quantity than the publishers can produce and sell them.
If an unknown obscure preacher can gain national attention by threatening to burn the quoran, and can imagine that he has negotiating power and can even get whole buildings moved, then surely the pentagon should follow the same successful strategy.
Even if the pentagon doesn't burn them, then whatever other means of destruction they use will be equally effective at stopping the spread of these ideas and information. If that doesn't work they can also announce that they will hold their breath until this information stops spreading.
</sarcasm>
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If the Pentagon will tell me what it was they didn't like in the reservist's book, I can put it into my book too.
And then they can buy up all the copies.
10,000 copies will be about $20,000 in royalties.
Of course if the reservist has PDF copies of his book floating around, the Pentagon will never get back all the copies of the book.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
or
"Information want's to be free".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
there is more to the story
According to the article in the NYT:
"The disputed material includes the names of American intelligence officers who served with Colonel Shaffer and his accounts of clandestine operations, including N.S.A. eavesdropping operations, according to two people briefed on the Pentagon’s objections."
Sounds like the author has been working with the gov to make sure the book is approved. The book contains people's names and that seems to be the major issue. So they are working a second version without the names. So the gov wants to buy up the books in an attempt to protect its people. Big deal. Their plan may not work but this does not seem like some kind of conspiracy or some way to stifle the author's speech.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: there is more to the story
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The truth is out there
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The truth is out there
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@1 and @2
GO GO GO
tell them your going to die and leave a copy to all the known relatives and there relatives and so on that you have back to anti diluvian times MUHAHA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Burn it all
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Censorship Capitalist style
After a few hours of though, and a glass of wine. I've decided that is actually quite funny. I guess the military could have tried to "suppress it in the name of security". I actually prefer them simply buying the Author off. I wonder what could have been so bad. As a Soldier, I often wonder why things are kept secret... is it because they're dangerous or because they're embarrassing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Censorship Capitalist style
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Censorship Capitalist style
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Buy (and/or burn) the books...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Misleading Story / Subject
They screwed up when consulting on the book originally and didn't get the names altered or redacted and it's already been printed up. Instead of leaving the publisher in the cold, they're going to buy all the first runs.
Basically they've taken ownership for a mistake and the book is still being released, just without the names of the people that could supposedly/possibly be put in danger.
Nothing to see here, move along...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]