Vandals' Bass Player Not A Fan Of The Public Domain, Thinks PD Recordings Will 'Destroy' Classical Music
from the is-this-a-joke? dept
We've covered how Vandals' bass player, Joe Escalante, a former entertainment industry lawyer, is currently in the middle of a legal fight with Reed Elsevier over a parody logo the band briefly used -- but has since stopped using. His discussions of the lawsuit have been interesting and informative, so I'm a bit shocked to see the following article, submitted by a bunch of folks where Escalante goes a bit off his rocker in attacking the public domain as "communism." Honestly, I had to read it a few times, and am still sort of wondering if this is pure satire. If it is, bravo. If it's not, Escalante may have taken cluelessness about the public domain to previously unheard of levels.At issue? The story we recently covered of how the folks at Musopen wanted to raise money to hire an orchestra to record public domain symphonies, and release the recordings into the public domain. As you're hopefully aware, while such symphonies are in the public domain already, new recordings of those works are not. The composition is still public domain, but the recording gets a new copyright. Thus you really can't find public domain recordings of many of these works -- something which Musopen is helpfully looking to fix. That effort has been a massive success, with the group far surpassing its original goal of raising $11,000. In fact, Musopen has said that the more money they raise, the more songs they'll record and release into the public domain with the orchestra they hire. Who could possibly complain about that?
Escalante apparently.
Does this sound nice to you? If it does, you are forgetting one thing.You are forgetting that if these recordings have some commercial value it creates a market for them which not only employs musicians, it encourages better and better recordings and orchestrations that benefit all of society. Destroy their commercial value, and you destroy a lot more than you realize.This makes absolutely no sense. Putting something into the public domain creates all sorts of additional commercial value in that it makes those works usable in all sorts of new and interesting ways. That's why we have the public domain after all. And, just because something is in the public domain, it doesn't "destroy" the value of the work. That's economically wrong, as has been shown over and over and over again. Allowing a work to hit is actual economic price, leads to a much greater economic efficiency, enabling all sorts of additional commercial opportunities. With the statements above, Escalante shows why he's a lawyer/bassist, not an economist.
Is it that offensive to these people that musicians should get paid for mastering their chosen instruments and making the sacrifices necessary to become a professional? Or is it crazy if someone gets a return on an investment to undertake the enormous task of recording a 100 plus person orchestra? Carried to it's logical conclusion, someday all classical recordings will be in the public domain so this faction of the recording industry can just shut down. Now you can tell your kids not to waste time learning the cello, because there's no way to earn anything from the sacrifice, so don't go to orchestra practice. It's a waste of time.This is the paragraph that made me wonder if this is really pure satire. Escalante should go look up the history of the music industry. When player pianos first came out, the industry said that no one would ever go see live music again. When the radio came out, we heard the same thing. All through history, every time something new comes out, we're told that it will "destroy" the previous industry, but that's never happened. Making public domain recordings does absolutely nothing to remove the "return on investment" of an orchestra. Did Escalante really miss the fact that Musopen just raised a ton of money to pay this orchestra to make this recording? If he didn't get confused, then why is he claiming that this action to pay musicians is "offensive" to those who believe musicians should get paid? Furthermore, just because there's one public domain recording, there will be no market for orchestras? Seriously? This is the identical claim to the idea that player pianos would kill off musicians, because who'd ever need to see a live musician when they can just stick a piano roll in the player piano.
So we should let people make films and sell them and keep all the money instead of giving some to the musicians and encouraging their pursuit of these arts?First of all, the musicians got paid. Why does Escalante keep ignoring this? It's like a giant mental block. On top of that, one of the important parts of the public domain is the fact that it allows others to build on previous works and create new sorts of works. Escalante seems wholly ignorant of the public domain. If someone sends me his address, I'll gladly send Escalante a free copy of Jamie Boyle's excellent book The Public Domain, so he can learn a bit about why the public domain is so important, and why it's a complete myth that it harms anyone.
Can you believe this? Why not hire sound alikes to record all the works of the Buena Vista Social Club so we can get around paying those suckers. We can avoid paying at least 1/2 of what we used to have to pay to license their works. They're seminal, why not? Esguerra actually calls this a "creative solution" to the problem of having to pay for the rights these musicians have obtained by sweat and talent. Does he also agree that waiting until midnight with a brick in your hand is a "creative solution" to the problem of having to pay for a plasma TV as well?Again, I'm left wondering if Escalante is being satirical here. Just look at the video games Rock Band and Guitar Hero. For a while, both of them regularly used "sound-alike" recordings for bands that didn't want to license the originals -- and fans hated it. They wanted the originals. The claim that you could just hire a sound-alike and that's fine is provably false. People want the originals. It's already legal to record sound-alikes if you pay compulsory licenses, and it hasn't damaged anyone.
And please don't confuse this with the concept of "music should be free" because we're in a "new era," etc. It is nothing like that. My band The Vandals allow many unauthorized uploads on YouTube and other places as a measure of good will, we don't run around and bust infringers routinely. We get it, they listen, they might come to a show or push some kind of demand for us. Musopen is not a part of that movement, make no mistake. They are extremists trying to deprive honest working people of what they already earned to spite them for having the audacity to charge for their services.Seriously? Putting public domain music into the public domain is "extremist" and "deprives honest hard working people" of what they've earned? Someone seriously needs a massive history lesson on the public domain.
The EFF calls for "music lovers" to support them with their wallets. This isn't for music lovers, it's for music killers. I actually used to have respect for EFF. I thought they were an important part of the debate but this is off the deep end.Supporting the public domain is killing music and "off the deep end"? No, Joe. Telling people that supporting a larger public domain is what's off the deep end. The public domain is where great creativity and great creative works come from. It's the endless fountain of resources that people can pull from to do amazing new things. I actually used to have respect for Escalante for his fight with Reed Elsevier. I thought he was an important part of the debate, but this is off the deep end.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: classical music, joe escalante, public domain
Companies: musopen
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Apparently he has not watched a Disney movie in the last several decades.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Next he'll be claiming that copyright should be wholly indefinite.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Communism
As Mr. Esclalante would say, "That's just plain old fashioned communism!"
What a hypocrite.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Communism
I've already wrote this up. The copyright industry does not compete in a free market.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Good thing they've already raised over $40,000 then, huh?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And in any case, no 'orchestrations' will be used in this project anyway, because the orchestrations wouldn't be in the public domain now, would they?
If I hadn't seen this article myself, I wouldn't believe it. It sounds too much like a parody to be real. But it seems not to be all too real. Sad.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well isn't that a quaint turn of events.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Public Domain just sits there
But I'm no expert. As time goes on, will building this type of capability provide important unhampered creative tools? Certainly, it's offering something?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lawyers and bassists take whatever gig pays.
Also proves that when it comes to personal interests and money, no one can be trusted to see reason.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wait.
Destroy? Really? Oh, sure, it's not like most children first hear classical music in Looney Toons and Tom and Jerry- Oh wait.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Communism
No, they don't. But nobody is really surprised when the big media companies or even big name artists say they're for policies which are actually anticompetative. What's surprising in this case is that you have a member of a less-well-knowm band bashing competition who is also on record as being against copyright maximalism. He doesn't come out and say it, but the logical conclusion of his stance is that there shouldn't be a public domain or that there should be some kind of law to "protect" musicians from the public domain. The irony of course is that his (presumed) solution is more communist than what he accuses Musopen of.
Communism? You keep using that word, Mr Escalante. I don't think it means what you think it means.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I stopped right here
So this loser thinks since you cant monetize your playing the Cello, its not worth it. So if you cant get cash, its not worth it. What a sad sad outlook on life. I hope he does not have kids.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
we need more Beethoven
Obviously there's room for one more recording in this world, and as someone who can't afford to hire an orchestra to record a symphony for my Youtube video, let alone license an existing recording, I'd welcome a public domain recording.
He should be happy they're actually hiring new musicians for this project, rather than simply buying the copyright of an older recording.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Or in commercials, or movies, or even, *GASP* inside popular music! (see Whiter Shade of Pale and Lover's Concerto for obvious examples)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wow, thats’s SO Punk Rock, Joe
[ link to this | view in thread ]
There have been amazing recordings of Beethoven's symphonies (von Karajan, anyone?), so someone could argue nobody else will bother to re-record them, because they couldn't possibly do a better job.
Yet, hundreds of orchestras play and record the works of Beethoven every year.
Given Mr Escalante's thinking, we should have stopped von Karajan from making his recordings, because it could have discouraged others from making new recordings. Of course, that's totally stupid.
Free recordings of the symphonies can only push up the quality of future commercial recordings, because if those orchestras wish to compete with the free versions, they have to do better. This is a good thing, because it's the best possible way to "promote the progress of the useful arts" and Escalante is a fucking idiot.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Lawyers and bassists take whatever gig pays.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The companies involved in selling recorded classical music went absolutely nuts, claiming that the BBC would destroy the market for classical music. The companies brought sufficient political pressure to bear so that the BBC promised never to repeat the project.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The 10 grand is probably for the recording/mixing/mastering and not playing.
Meanwhile, as pointed out below, it went way above 10 grand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
@20
hows emi's website doing today?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Google who is recording most movie soundtracks right now, and what they charge.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
We have a form set up for it here:
https://spreadsheets2.google.com/viewform?hl=en&formkey=dHpnYzZlUERIczFESWJCVEZvMW4yZ0E 6MQ#gid=0
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Look up czech orchestras, see how many movie soundtracks they make each year, then see the cost.
Im asking them to record music they play hundreds of times already.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If Public domain is so bad why do we still play public domain compositions????
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sounds like this guy wants to kill classical music
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
If you don't believe them then check the following calculation:
The Prague Symphony orchestra is giving a concert this month in the Smetana Hall (capacity 1100) tickets are 450- 600 Koruna ~ $20- $30 implying that you can certainly buy this Orchestra for an evening plus rehearsals for under $30,000. A recording studio will almost certainly be cheaper than a large concert hall.
The extra money we have now got can be used to hire a better orchestra and/or record more music.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dear Mr Escalante
If you don't like it then tough.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How many low budget and independent artists/creators can benefit from not having to blow half their budget on licensing decent recordings of public domain works (or really just forgoing their use at all since they likely can't afford the licenses to begin with)?
How many kids can benefit from using public domain music in the amateur videos they post to the web?
How many non-profits can benefit from using public domain music in their promotional material?
Unless Escalante wrote a brilliant symphony and then died over 70 years ago, he doesn't have a dog in this fight anyway.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What an idiot
So we should let people make films and sell them and keep all the money instead of giving some to the musicians and encouraging their pursuit of these arts?
You know those kids who learned the cello so they could "get paid for mastering their chosen instruments and making the sacrifices necessary to become a professional?" (And, apparently, for no other reason?)
If they're members of a symphony orchestra, then they're employed as "work for hire" musicians. They earn union scale, not royalties. Whether or not their performance is used in a film doesn't matter, since they get paid the same either way.
And they only get paid when they record new material. If they're recording new versions of classical pieces, it's usually because the performance is the selling point, not the piece itself. Otherwise, whoever is hiring them would just license old recordings.
And the artists on those old recordings worked the same way, so they wouldn't get royalties either.
So, the musicians themselves lose absolutely nothing in any case. They get paid exactly the same whether their performances are in the public domain or not.
Why not hire sound alikes to record all the works of the Buena Vista Social Club so we can get around paying those suckers.
Many, many, many people do this, all the time. How many times have you heard re-recorded pop songs in commercials, musak, or those old lounge records?
It's perfectly legal, and widely accepted. The performers don't get royalties in those cases, either - just the composers.
Which in this case would be members of the Buena Vista Social Club, so they would get paid.
He's utterly wrong all around.
So wrong, in fact, that I also suspect it might be some sort of prank. I hope so.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I stopped right here
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I've said this a million times but IP maximists are too dumb to ever get it.
Communism requires an institution to implement. The public domain and a lack of copy protection laws do not.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Lawyers and bassists take whatever gig pays.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sounds like this guy wants to kill classical music
Symphony orchestras make most of their money off live performances of public domain works. They use this in turn to get people into concert halls to listen to the rest of the programme: new works by new composers. And that is how new composers get paid.
If you want to do classical musicians a favour, stop extending copyright. That way, more of the classical music of the early 20th century will get played in concert halls, and in turn, more people will end up hearing the work of new composers, and might even find they like it and want to pay them for some of their music.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Cello???
lol!
When did anyone EVER play Cello for the money??
When did you ever hear anyone say the following: "I always wanted to be a doctor, but all the fame and fortune that comes from playing Cello at the subway was too appealing!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Satire
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Satire
Officially it is just a monopoly on individual compositions or sound recordings - but the holders of most of these rights behave as a cartel. They trade the rights in large blocks so that ordinary people can never afford to purchase them. They distribute work under the strictest provisions that the law allows. They never compete with one another in the area of conditions of usage and copying etc.
The effect of this is to turn the monopoly on individual works into an effective monopoly on ALL works!
What this initiative does is to break the cartel by radically undercutting its standard terms and conditions. That is why these people hate it so much (much more than they hate piracy - because that appears to give them some "moral high ground") - but they dare not be fully honest about why.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "Good luck recording, mixing, and mastering a full orchestra for $10,000"
Everything has gotten cheaper. What Hollywood pays to record a soundtrack has traditionally been higher than what an Independent would. I know for a fact that it is possible to make a studio recording of a full length commercial quality CD with an 8 piece band for CDN$ 1,000. So $10,000 for an orchestra doesn't sound all that out of line. Particularly if you factor in the fact that many people would be willing to volunteer their services for such a good cause-- as we've already seen here.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Public domain
The other thing that really bothers me is that he insists that musicians need to get paid. What he is completely overlooking is the fact that museopen is going to pay the damn musicians. I highly doubt that individual orchestra members profit directly from CD sales. Not just because the record label will take most of it, but because that isn't how it works. Sure the orchestra might have more cash flowing allowing a possible higher salary or something, but most of that money comes from endowments and gifts not from the recordings. His whole article is total bunk when he waxes eloquent about how musicians won't get paid when museopen is absolutely going to pay them.
A final note. I live in Boston. I really like the BSO and the BPO. If there is an option for a recording from them I tend to default to them because I know the quality is good. Of course I also know that New York Phil and Chicago Orchestra are pretty damn good as well. In the end I don't mind having multiple recordings of the same piece by different orchestras. Not only do orchestras sound different, but they have different conductors. Maybe one does something extraordinary. The idea that I won't buy a recording because these are free is absurd.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Joe Escalante
[ link to this | view in thread ]