Would US Officials Really Decide Not To Sign ACTA?
from the or-is-that-for-show? dept
Well, here's a bit of a surprise. We had just been saying that of course the US would sign onto ACTA, but apparently it's no sure thing. Jamie Love, who is pretty well connected with what's going on with ACTA, mentioned on Twitter that US officials are seriously considering dropping ACTA, after "losing" to the EU on the question of whether or not patents would be included. The US did not want patents in ACTA, while Europe did and Europe has likely won that battle. While the US is still pushing for them to be taken out, it seems unlikely at this point. Because of that, US officials are apparently honestly thinking about not signing. Love does note that Stan McCoy, who led the negotiations, isn't too worried about the patent issue, but others in the administration believe it's a big deal.This is definitely news -- though, in the end I still can't see the US bailing on ACTA. The USTR has been so involved in the process, and has been so self-congratulatory all along with this latest draft, that it would be a huge political letdown not to sign the document. My guess is that it will get signed (and the US will be among the first to sign it), with those involved suggesting that we'll just ignore anything we don't like (as we've done in the past on other international agreements). Still, wouldn't it be something if the US actually bailed out on ACTA?
Meanwhile, apparently in an effort to highlight just how screwed up the whole ACTA process is, the US Patent and Trademark Office, which has been heavily involved in the ACTA negotiations with the USTR as well, has apparently refused to meet with concerned individuals about ACTA until after it's signed. This is how the US government listens to stakeholers? "We'll only talk to you after it's too late to fix?" Comforting.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
That would be far more sensible than your current system of 'Bribe everyone to make laws for us.'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Disgustingly cheesy on all sides.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obama's conundrum
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Obama's conundrum
If he couldn't dance the DC Shuffle without imploding, he would never have made a big party ticket. Dichotomy is the root of politic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Obama's conundrum
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Obama's conundrum
Yes we can! Yes we can! Yes we can!
Oh wait, the campaign is over... Okay, stop the propaganda and lie machine, business as usual.
Carry on, nothing to see here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
c'mon techdirt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: c'mon techdirt
As opposed to a traditional news article that links to absolutely nothing and is pure speculation? Jamie is very, very involved and in touch with those involved in the negotiations, and the tweets highlight what he's learned. No one else has covered what he's learned, so I wrote the article. Is it somehow less newsworthy because it's in a tweet, rather than having me call him up and not tell you my sources?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: c'mon techdirt
Yes, I can understand some in the US having concerns about the inclusion of patents, but based upon my having followed the trials and tribulations of these negotiations the concerns are likely associated for the most part with pharma issues concerning generics, "in-transit", etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: c'mon techdirt
Actually, my issue is that Twitter is exceptionally bad at providing context; with the average blog it is usually reasonable to go back and read old posts, with Twitter you just have a jumble of unconnected sentence fragments.
Thus, ideally the journalistic "value add" of TechDirt would be to provide some context, such as who Jamie Love is and what the argument about patents in ACTA involves, for those of us who have not been following the issue obsessively. Two more links to background information embedded in the story is all it would take.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: c'mon techdirt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: c'mon techdirt
http://www.techdirt.com/blog.php?tag=acta&edition=techdirt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: c'mon techdirt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
League of Nations
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: League of Nations
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just an observation but ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just an observation but ....
the main difference is sneakyness to explosion ratios...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think there are reasons
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/10/patent-troll-takes-over-the-web-can-it-b e-stopped.ars
Now add that to an international level of play and you will reduce most companies to their legal departments.
I can't say that there doesn't need to be protection but I do think that what intellectual rights are being argued and what is currently already killing quite a lot of innovation needs to be addressed before the idea that global agreements are somehow going to make things better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"apparently honestly" always signals FIX IS IN.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
???acta???
is this alameda corridor transportation authority?
alliance for california traditional art?
administrative council for terminal attachments?
american council of trustees and alumni?
or perhaps the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ???acta???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We'll only talk to you after it's too late to fix
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
too late to fix
No surprise there. That's how Congress and the President have handled what they call patent reform. Just because they call it “reform” doesn’t mean it is. Please see http://truereform.piausa.org/ for a different/opposing view on patent reform.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: too late to fix
[ link to this | view in chronology ]