'The Movie Business Is Dying!! Blame TV!' -- The 1959 Edition
from the the-sky-is-falling dept
We've noted, multiple times, that the entertainment industry has an incredible ability to simply declare that any new innovation is clearly going to kill the old industry, and every single time they've been wrong (often ridiculously so). Of course, the most famous may be Jack Valenti's claim that the VCR was the "Boston Strangler" to the movie industry. But this kind of ridiculously wrong predicting happened throughout history. One of our readers, Craig, points us to a fantastic program put on by the CBC radio up in Canada, culling through the archives of old interviews and re-airing them, including a series of interviews with "leading ladies of Hollywood." That link is actually to the second part of the series. You can find the first part here. Each episode is a series of interviews. The final interview in the first part is a few minutes of a talk with Mary Pickford, who not only was a huge Hollywood star in the early days of Hollywood, but also cofounded the movie studio United Artists (with her husband, Douglas Fairbanks, and Charlie Chaplin), and was one of the founders of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (the folks who put on the Oscars). The interview then continues into that second part of the series.So why do we care? Well, take a listen to the interview in part 2, done in May of 1959 with the CBC's Tony Thomas, where Pickford starts complaining about how television is killing the movie industry, and warns especially about the pernicious intent of pay TV. Starting around 27:40 in the recording, she claims that TV is going to takedown the motion picture industry:
Pickford: I, in my short life, have seen the birth and the death of motion pictures.Sound familiar? Of course, there's nothing wrong with making a bad prediction. We all do it. But, when the industry "insiders" are so consistently dead wrong about how every new technology will "kill off" their existing industry, at some point, shouldn't we be asking why people still take them seriously when they do it again?
Thomas: You think the motion picture has died?
Pickford: Mm hmm.
Thomas: But why should it?
Pickford: Because of the competition. Uh, you know. You can see the old motion pictures, that are just as good... or better than some of them today. And why should people leave their house?
Thomas: But you can see a picture so much better on a big screen in a comfortable theater than you can on a box in your living room.
Pickford: Well, that's true. But it's very expensive, and we have to face the fact that at one time there was 17,000 theaters -- I don't know what the number is today -- but it breaks my heart to go by them today and see them... bowling alleys and skating rinks. Certainly, the motion picture will always be there, but I believe when paid TV comes in, and I'm sure it'll be less expensive than going to the theater, that it'll be the real death knell of motion pictures.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cable tv, history, mary pickford, movie industry, tv
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why does it matter
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why does it matter
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It sounds like their big problem wasn't pay TV, but bowling and skating. Somebody should write a law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
First they come for the skating rinks, and I did nothing because I don't skate........and so on and so forth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Sorry, we were all busy playing Wii bowling and doing the skiing/skating thing on Wii Fit/Sports....
Wait a minute! Nintendo! They're the ones killing our bowling/skating industries! Dey took der jobs!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The More Things Change...
What's sad, to me, is that now is a golden opportunity to recognize there are hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of new media makers; new producers, as it were. Why not reach out to them and provide them with meaningful support and infrastructure; and in the collaboration maybe come up with some new ways of doing business?
*sigh*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Theaters need to innovate. Bigger screens, higher quality pictures, better sound, maybe find other ways to help people enjoy the movie better. More theaters can adopt Imax.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Movie theaters can do the same thing. Stick hydraulics (as in what makes cars bump up and down) on the stage and make the stage shake during simulated earthquakes or explosions. Find ways to simulate wind, mist, odor, stage vibration, acceleration, etc...
For whatever reason (part of it might have to do with government lobbying for bad laws) these theaters have gone far too long without innovating. It's time they stop complaining and start innovating.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I can think of a million theatrical innovations that they can come up with to enhance the experience and make it more worthy of attending. But no, instead of innovating, all they choose to do is complain complain complain (and lobby, lobby lobby).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I can think of a million theatrical innovations that they can come up with to enhance the experience and make it more worthy of attending. But no, instead of innovating, all they choose to do is complain complain complain (and lobby, lobby lobby).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Television IS to blame!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wolf! Wolf! Wolf!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Control and Artificial Scarcity
The Internet removes that scarcity, and removes those gatekeepers. I'm not saying that we won't find a way to benefit from this new structure, but I am saying that it is truly novel, and not just a continuation on a historical curve. I'm not sure that history can inform us on this matter.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And one more thing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIgZHZpiq1U
[ link to this | view in chronology ]