Democrats Are From Cablevision & Republicans Are From Fox In Retransmission Fee Dispute?
from the republicrats dept
One of the nice things about most tech issues is that they're not split down typical political party lines. In practice, tragically, that sometimes means that both of the major political parties side with rent-seeking interests, rather than the public good, but in other cases, it does mean that you can get actually cross-party discussion on the issues, rather than the talking points. However, it seems that whenever any particular issue gets "big enough," it suddenly has to break down on party lines. We saw it happen with net neutrality, but now it appears to be happening on the whole silly retransmission fight between cable companies and TV networks. As mentioned, these fights break out every few months, with both the networks and the cable companies blaming each other. In the end, consumers end up with higher prices either way. The whole fight itself is silly, but when TV stations get blocked during key sporting events (football, baseball playoffs), apparently Congress immediately sees an issue worth grandstanding over.And, as Broadband Reports notes, at least in the case of Cablevision/Fox, it's become a partisan issue, with Democrats lining up behind Cablevision, introducing legislation that would bar broadcasters from pulling channels during negotiations. Meanwhile, Republicans are being lobbied heavily by News Corp to take its side. It could just be that it's because this is News Corp./Fox, which tends to support Republicans. So it will be interesting to see if similar battles involving other broadcasters split along similar lines...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cable, politics, retransmission, tv
Companies: cablevision, fox, news corp.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Libertarians
As for the political standing, I always thought most people who really give a damn about tech issues seem to lean towards the Libertarian point of view. And everyone else just tends to think of us as paranoid wackos. At least, this is my experience.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Libertarians
Just pull your money, it's the loudest and clearest way to speak to a corporation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: No Libertarians
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is the rational for this ... ahhhh never mind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It is not a problem if I want to sell my stuff for what I think it is worth. If I price it to high people will not buy it. Why the fuck do you care how much entity A wants to charge entity B for it services. 2 PRIVATE companies negotiating. It is a fucking crime that congress would step in either way here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Agreed, except if this is all a show so that they can both raise prices on the consumer....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tis the order of things...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tis the order of things...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Tis the order of things...
OH wait,t hat was SARCASM. Got it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Tis the order of things...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Tis the order of things...
Which is why they're both worthless....
This whole political theatre show is useless....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Tis the order of things...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Tis the order of things...
Coincidentally, that will also be the theme for our foreign policy....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Tis the order of things...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Tis the order of things...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Tis the order of things...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Tis the order of things...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Paywalls
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Paywalls
No. The current generation of TV viewers are about three decades removed from the days when we received all TV from antennas. I'd guess that 99% of people under 25 would have no clue that you can get HD network television for free. 95% for those under 30.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Paywalls
A few months ago I put some HD rabbit ears on a TV in our guest room. Tuned into Chuck to test it, and my wife (29) said, "I didn't know you could still do that."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Paywalls
Lol - good one
errr, that was a joke, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Paywalls
(yes i have looked at antennaweb and etc.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
See full article from DailyFinance: http://srph.it/crp19D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
-CF
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If we get a bill a couple of months from now specifically banning a handful of particularly annoying commercials, I'll probably laugh my head off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
oh - wait ... it already is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I love this country but the idea that the government sets some consumer-friendly rules should be implemented
[ link to this | view in chronology ]