US Lost The Codes For Nuclear Launch For Months

from the actually,-that-kind-of-makes-me-feel-safer dept

Mon, Oct 25th 2010 11:46am — Mike Masnick

Not quite sure what to make of this one, but apparently, the special codes that the president needs to kick off a nuclear strike were lost for a few months during the Clinton administration. Now, you may ask (I know I did!) why they didn't just get new codes, and apparently the answer is that the aide who was in charge of hanging onto the codes didn't admit he had lost them for a few months. Apparently, someone's supposed to check the codes every month, and when they went to check the codes, the aide in question claimed that the President had them, but "was in an important meeting." The next month, same story. It was only a few months later, when the codes were set to be changed anyway, that the aide admitted to having "misplaced" the codes.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: government, nuclear codes

31 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Jay (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 11:53am

So does this mean we'll see the codes on ebay?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 11:53am

Crap
This story is burying the older one, which is that the launch codes had a default that was used for years because of this sort of BS. It was 9999 or something similar.

One Quatloo for whomever comes up with the deafault code!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2010 @ 11:54am
  
  Re: Crap
  I've got the same combination on my luggage!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 4:25pm
    
    Re: Re: Crap
    Indeed.
    
    http://www.damninteresting.com/ive-got-the-same-combination-on-my-luggage
    
    (For the record, it was 00000000)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 26 Oct 2010 @ 2:19pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Crap
      Everyone can now be told, the all-powerful launch code was changed to: CPE 1704 TKS
      
      That way, any time they needed the dang code, all they had to do was pop in a VCR or DVD copy of the 80's movie WARGAMES and fast fwd to that part.
      
      Stupid aide probably turned the code back into a local Blockbuster video store, thinking it was a rental and didn't want to be stuck paying the late fees.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
weneedhelp (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 12:00pm

Insert The Benny hill theme here...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yogi, 25 Oct 2010 @ 12:05pm

Grass
I guess Clinton passed around a few too many of whatever he was smoking at the time...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rikuo (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 12:10pm

Huh
The article on Gizmodo was different. It said that Clinton merely shrugged one day and admitted he hadn't seen the "biscuit" for months.
For those who don't know, the biscuit is a special card that has codes that let the nuclear silo commanders know that its the president really talking.
The Gizmodo article didn't mention anything about an aide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kerwin, 25 Oct 2010 @ 12:12pm

meh
I'm not surprised by peoples ineptitude anymore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ron Rezendes (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 12:27pm

Maybe....
I'll bet the codes ended up on Monica's dress!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
nasch (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 12:37pm

Just wait?
an official had gone to check one month and been told by the aide that the codes were on the president's person but that he was in an important meeting and could not be disturbed.

You're talking about nuclear (or later, nucular) launch codes. Why wouldn't the response be, "OK, I'll wait here until he's available." There's something more important that official needed to do?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2010 @ 12:48pm
  
  Re: Just wait?
  "There's something more important that official needed to do?"
  
  Only on the day we start launching nuclear weapons. Until then we are too busy blowing up the desert with non-nuclear weapons.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - maxnicks (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 1:14pm
    
    Re: Re: Just wait?
    True dat. Instead of blowing up the desert with non-nukes, we ought to switch to the nukes. Make a big glass parking lot out of the middle east. See? Problem solved!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2010 @ 12:48pm

Who cares about that, the U.S. government lost the economy, jobs, insurance, freedoms for the people, respect for the law and people keep thinking a nuke is important at this point? The people guarding the nukes already probably misplaced them in the middle east or dismantled them for scraps and the people in power now don't even realize it yet.

/sarcasm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2010 @ 1:18pm

About loosing things how about all those people using wireless?

Firefox extension to sniff out open connections and get passwords, the objective is not to hack anyone but to make websites start using encryption because it is to darn easy to sniff anybody these days.
http://hackaday.com/2010/10/25/firesheep-promoting-privacy-in-a-scary-way/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Berenerd (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 1:20pm

I am just glad....
Bush never found them....

"Moles in the yard? terrorists! What was the code again? 1....2....3.....4....5....? no thats my luggage! Gosh darmnit!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
xs (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 1:26pm

I say this is just a hoax
Isn't the code supposed to be inside the "football", i.e., the black suitcase cuffed to the staffer's hand? And one aid carries the suitcase around the president 24 hour straight in case it is needed? Since we can safely assume that one staffer can't be on duty 24/7, the staffer on the next shift would have discovered the code was missing when he arrives on duty and inspect the content of "football" just to make sure he doesn't gets blamed for this type of issues. Even if the suitcase can't be opened until ordered by the president, there would have been a seal in place to make sure it wasn't tampered with, still would have required inspection by the next shift.

And don't tell me that there isn't such inspection taking places on every instance the "football" changes hand. Check-in/check-out procedures are in place even in all kinds of non-secure places, to think such procedure isn't routine with one of the most important item in the world is just moronic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- pixelpusher220 (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 1:37pm
  
  Re: I say this is just a hoax
  That's assuming the 'aide' is allowed to open the 'football'. Conceivable that while he is tasked with carrying it, he isn't authorized to actually open the case.
  
  That said, why the verification check was just a once a month thing is crazy. Either you wait till the Prez is available, or you come back the next friggin day every day until they are produced.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Josh in CharlotteNC (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 2:15pm
  
  Re: I say this is just a hoax
  The football contains the different plans and scenarios for various nuclear launches. Plan 1: Nuke Moscow and everywhere else before the enemy can react. Plan 2: High altitude air burst to disrupt enemy communications. And such.
  
  The card that this story is referring to contains a bunch of different sets of numbers. The President picks one of those sets when he first gets the card, it is programmed into the control systems, then he must repeat that same set to actually launch the nukes. That card is supposed to be on him at all times, and he is the only one that is supposed to know which set of numbers he picked.
  
  At least, that's what Tom Clancy novels have in them - but he's usually right about how this stuff works.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Rikuo (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 2:47pm
    
    Re: Re: I say this is just a hoax
    It is kind of funny and scary at the same time that you're basing all of your information from a Tom Clancy novel...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Josh in CharlotteNC (profile), 26 Oct 2010 @ 9:37am
      
      Re: Re: Re: I say this is just a hoax
      He does a lot of research and much of the information is public knowledge. Just citing my source.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2010 @ 1:37pm

Apparently they also missed the time because 12 years latter is a bit late to announce those things.

Well who cares the government lost jobs, the economy, respect, leadership position and a lot of other things, they probably don't even have the nukes so the codes were useless anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2010 @ 1:40pm

That aide needs to be tried for treason tbh. If he'd just have come clean I wouldn't have a problem, but withholding the fact that the codes are missing (for months!) is inexcusable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Will Sizemore (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 1:45pm

I used to be in the Army...
...and when we had something that was kept on a person, we checked several times daily. When we had stuff in safes, we checked monthly, or more frequently. We never had an incident or a loss of information (or loss of custody of information) and the guys at the White House are supposed to be following MORE STRINGENT regulations, especially for something as potentially devastating as this.

One thing's for sure, if this person who allegedly lost the codes has any sort of security clearance anymore, we're all doomed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
out_of_the_blue, 25 Oct 2010 @ 5:00pm

Less here than the "nuclear" conjures up.
According to comments elsewhere that I find authoritative, this item wasn't crucial; other communication systems could be used to verify identity, they don't rely on just one.

It's the sort of thing put out to distract from current problems or to herald an upcoming significant event to those in the know. We will have to wait and see which it is, or whether just random noise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
James Carmichael (profile), 25 Oct 2010 @ 7:20pm

The elephant in the room
I'm a little off topic but I think it's something that's important to mention: I thought having nuclear weapons was a BAD thing!

At least that's what you guys keep telling other countries...

Isn't it time to just get rid of those silly things anyway? Come ooooonnnn.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- nasch (profile), 26 Oct 2010 @ 8:31am
  
  Re: The elephant in the room
  Isn't it time to just get rid of those silly things anyway?
  
  You would think so. Instead, we're designing and building new ones. Becuse the old ones might not work anymore, to which any normal individual would respond: GREAT!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Steve Hall, 26 Oct 2010 @ 7:34am

sbhall52@gmail.com
Pure, unadulterated bullshit. This is even below TechDirt's low standards. Even the most rudimentary fact-checking would put the lie to this entire story. Let's just start from point one: The President never is in physical possession of the nuclear launch codes. How do I know? Twenty years in the Air Force as a nuclear operations officer, including Minuteman ICBM crew member.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- nasch (profile), 26 Oct 2010 @ 8:30am
  
  Re: sbhall52@gmail.com
  OK, then post references to disprove the story.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Oct 2010 @ 2:01pm

Steve, you were sitting in a sile undergound in the middle of no where. How does that qualify as to knowing what Clinton had or didn't have?

Gotta be a pretty good pick up line, "Hey baby, wanna touch the codes that could end the world?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 Oct 2012 @ 3:26pm

it was not my fault the president had them he may have been under the influence but i gave them to him
[ link to this | view in chronology ]