Planet Money T-Shirt Plans Include Recognizing That Copying Works For Fashion
from the good-for-them dept
Earlier this year, we wrote about how the NPR podcast Planet Money was planning to go into the t-shirt business to better understand the whole process of creating a small clothing retail operation, top to bottom. The idea was to create high quality t-shirts that people would actually want (and pay a premium for), rather than the typical cheapo t-shirts. I had been wondering what happened to that plan, because the Planet Money team hadn't mentioned it in a while, but they're finally back to discussing it, and the latest podcast, amazingly, hits on another topic we talk about frequently: how copying helps the fashion industry.Unfortunately, the Planet Money folks refer to it as "stealing," even as they talk to a bunch of folks who explain how copying is what really helps the industry thrive. They discuss the awful new fashion copyright bill, and how it's likely to have seriously bad consequences for the industry and for consumers, noting even, that many economists recognize that intellectual property is not a good solution in many markets. If a market can thrive and be competitive without intellectual property, adding such monopolies to the mix can be a disaster, leading to greater employment for lawyers, but harm to everyone else. They describe how having something like a fashion copyright will make it so that the industry needs to "clear" pretty much everything they do with the lawyers first. That means things will be a lot more expensive, and anything that can't be "cleared" may never get made.
It may not be "new" to folks around here, who have known all this for years, but it's nice to see these ideas spreading.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copying, fashion, planet money, t-shirts
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
On the other hand
Because young fashion designers can't exactly protect themselves from that type of copying.
http://onthemedia.org/transcripts/2010/10/08/05
f'r instance:
In other words, they need laws to prop up old business models. They don't need to change, the law and the people need to change. And if they can't get protected, people will simply stop creating new things. *rolls eyes*
I guess, On the Media needs to get the Planet Money guys on?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: On the other hand
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wasn’t It Picasso Who Said ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Exactly what we need.
When the revenue is packaged as a royalty, the industry can use "Double Irish" and "Dutch Sandwich" tax evasion strategies as long as the money stays off-shore, thereby avoiding repatriation of the funds, making it ineligible to be taxed.
Yay American Businesses!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hearing of this Planet Money article sent me back to those middle school days. Those movies are one of the many ways I think our schools have lost ground in explaining basic economic and civic theories to this generation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I hate it when English nouns a verb. *grin*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Excuse me, your honor?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ten comments in, and nobody?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Extraneous character in blog post.
:)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]