Myriad Appeals, Says Gene Patents Should Be Allowed
from the but-of-course dept
This will come as no surprise to anyone, but Myriad Genetics has officially appealed the ruling that invalidated gene patents. As you may recall, earlier this year, a court noted that genes are unpatentable, noting that they "are directed to a law of nature and were therefore improperly granted."Myriad is appealing on two points. First, it's claiming that the people who sued have no standing, because there's no controversy since the company hadn't taken any action against the plaintiffs. That seems like a pretty weak argument, given that Myriad had made it clear that it would enforce its patents against anyone else who tried to do research or genetic testing on the specific BRCA1/2 genes. Second, Myriad is claiming that the patents are valid, because it connected not just the gene (which is unpatentable), but the isolated gene combined with the information that this mutation predicts breat and ovarian cancer (also, unpatentable by itself). Basically, Myriad is suggesting that tying two unpatentable things together make this patentable. That makes little sense, and hopefully the appeals court sees through it as quickly as the district court did.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: brca1, brca2, gene patents, patents, standing
Companies: myriad genetics
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Absolutely It Should Be Patentable
Put it this way: think of each thing as a dried pea. Look at each one, and it looks like nothing more and nothing less than a dried pea�it�s �obvious� that�s what they are. But put two of those dried peas next to each other, and from some angles one pea obscures the other, and so it�s no longer �obvious� that you can see the other pea. That�s where the invention comes in�in choosing the right angle from which to view the peas.
And all we�re saying the courts should do, is to give these Myriad�s peas a chance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Absolutely It Should Be Patentable
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Absolutely It Should Be Patentable
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Absolutely It Should Be Patentable
So giving "Myriad's peas a chance" is not an option.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Absolutely It Should Be Patentable
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Absolutely It Should Be Patentable
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nina Paley
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nina Paley
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Nina Paley
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If genes are no longer able to have patent protection
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If genes are no longer able to have patent protection
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Take the Monsanto approach!
If Monsanto can do it with seeds, I'm sure Myriad can do it with genes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where Will the Liability End?
So if a company like Myraid and Monsanto insist that they have a property right to genes for the purpose of extorting revenue, they should also be liable for the damages caused by the "escape" of their so-called property.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Where Will the Liability End?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Where Will the Liability End?
I then don't suppose Monsanto would accept the cost of having their seeds or grown plants returned to them!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
change
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: change
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Breat cancer?????
I know you got a lot on your plate Mike, so this is a gentle reminder to use the spell check.
Interesting article otherwise
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
However I do believe virtually all for profit business should be forced to adopt a sliding scale pricing model that would allow everyone to access the technology.
Don't bother flaming me and saying thats socialism.......I call your bullshit right now. What it is, is a fair and reasonable solution that allows companies to continue to make some form of profit from their work while insuring those who find themselves economically disadvantaged have access to everything their society can offer them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]