Comcast Pretends That Cord Cutters Aren't Cord Cutters If They Cut Cord Because Of The Economy
from the denial-is-a-channel-on-the-internet dept
A couple of months back, we noted that the TV companies were in complete denial, insisting that the idea that people would cut the cable cord to go internet-only would never happen. However, we noted with amusement that the same day, that article came out so did a report saying that cable TV had suffered its first ever decline in subscribers. It seems that's continuing. Comcast apparently lost 275,000 video subscribers in the third quarter. However, the company has an ingenious way to make it clear that those people aren't cord cutters. Why not? Because they're saying they canceled their accounts due to the economy:Comcast lost 275,000 cable subscribers last quarter, and has lost 622,000 in the first 9 months of 2010. More evidence of "cord cutting"? Nope, says the cable giant. It's evidence that the economy sucks. That's the short version of the company's explanation for the drop during its earnings call this morning: It had a variety of reasons to explain the exodus of subscribers, but all of them revolved around money that their previous customers don't have or don't want to part with.Um. That doesn't change the fact that they were cord cutters. One of the reasons why people will cut the cord is that cable TV is too expensive (something that Mark Cuban is still confused about). One of the things contributing to the "tough economic conditions" for people at home is the fact that their cable bill keeps going up and up to pay for the "billions" in retransmission fees that Cuban and others want to last forever. And that's only going to serve to drive more people to cut the cord.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cord cutters, denial, economy
Companies: comcast
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
GTV
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: GTV
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
after being internet only, broadcast TV is weird
the program takes like 65 minutes, instead of 40, i have to watch the clock until it comes on, it gets constantly interrupted with commercials, and they're the same commercials over and over.
that kind of reckless inefficiency makes me feel like i'm doing something bad, like driving a humvee or eating an endangered animal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: after being internet only, broadcast TV is weird
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: after being internet only, broadcast TV is weird
if given a choice between ads or no ads, everyone would choose to not have ads. but if there is no way around ads, why not make them at least interesting to watch?
if you bought the air time, why not have 10 variations on an ad, so you don't burn the viewer out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
People are also pissed about...
In NO OTHER arena of American civil life are consumers forced to buy bundles of products. When I walk into a grocery store, I am not forced to choose between Family-Feed-Bag 1, 2 or 3.
Television programming is NO DIFFERENT. The technology limitation excuses are holdover lies from the past. The boxes today have total discrete control over the channels gated through.
Revolt! Revolt I say! Cut the cord! Smash the Dish!
Make these bastards crawl back to us with decently priced ala-carte programming by network.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: People are also pissed about...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: People are also pissed about...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: People are also pissed about...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: People are also pissed about...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: People are also pissed about...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: People are also pissed about...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: People are also pissed about...
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&biw=1280&bih=802&gbv=2&tbs=isch%3A1& ;sa=1&q=satellite+tv+cantenna&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
there's no opening of devices, you're simply attaching the pigtail and changing the antenna from an omni-directional to uni-directional and then to a parabolic. it's about using the parabolic shape of the dish, not the TV hardware or frequencies.
the frequncy and wattage stay the same, the dbi may increase, or decrease depending on the design. most of these hacks just change the shape of the broadcast area, making it more linear in the case of the cantenna and more conical in the case of a parabolic antenna. people do similar things with woks, strainers, and fry baskets:
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&source=imghp&biw=1280&bih=802&q=wok- fi+antenna&gbv=2&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
the FCC has better things to worry about than parabolic dish mashups, like folks who use firmware to change the frequencies the wifi card is broadcasting on:
http://www.defcon.org/images/defcon-16/dc16-presentations/defcon-16-de_bouvette-farina.pdf
( frequency manipulation stuff is toward the end, parts of the 4ghz range are supposedly reserved for military applications.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: People are also pissed about...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Even if it is true, their own logic still screws them...
if they are actually right and people are turning off cable because they can't pay for it, they are going to find a substitute...that is cheaper and better...which means when the economy picks back up, no one is coming back.
So they had better hope their logic is just as wrong as the cable-cutter theory or they are still screwed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Metering Internet usage
I fear that the reality is that w/so little choice in the marketplace, we are at their mercy one way or the other.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Metering Internet usage
And considering that I have a separate satellite and broadband companies - both of which have tv and internet services, hey, have at it. One will lose my business. The other may potentially gain my business. And I have a growing stack of books to read (paper...don't have to download them, thankyouverymuch)...
Play your games with each other because you know what? I'm perfectly comfortable sitting home at night with NO TV or computer turned on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Metering Internet usage
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Metering Internet usage
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Metering Internet usage
Personally, I 'overuse' Comcast's service nearly every month (though they keep on saying that I only use 230GB's a month, the figure is closer to 1TB).
The last time they tried to get on my case about it? I told them "Okay, then I will switch to FiOS and drop my cable TV as well! I will also tell my family and friends to do the same!"
Their tune changed REALLY DAMNED FAST after that!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alternative media?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Alternative media?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A good sign
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Like Frankincense, cable may be a thing of the past.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Economy sucks?
Once these people adapt without cable, getting them back is damn near impossible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Economy sucks?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Increase in broadband?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Increase in broadband?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I just did the opposite
Granted, it was because subscribing to cable tv gave me the option of having a 10x internet speed increase for only $2 more per month. After the 6 month promotion period ends, I'll be dropping the cable TV and going to the slower internet service until my house is built in a neighborhood that has fiber and its own ISP.
Also, does anyone know why ISPs still like to compare their speeds with dialup? I'd love to see USPS, Fedex, or UPS start comparing their speed with the Pony Express.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I just did the opposite
I'm on a pony.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I just did the opposite
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I just did the opposite
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I tried to be a cord cutter....
I bet I'm not included in the 275,000 people who cut their cable...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Record Labels
TV Studios
Newspapers
Magazines
Books
Movie Studios
Am I missing anyone??
Also with the number of people the content industries "Employ" (20% of the US population) shouldn't the US have gone for a mental health insurance plan instead of ObamaCare?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Off with your head for saying such anarchist things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
“Because Of The Economy”
So, is the state of the economy a cause or an effect?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Savings: $120+ a Month!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You pay for a month of programming, you get 2 weeks worth, mostly reruns over and over of the same shows. After the 2 weeks, what was on one channel of PPV has switched with another. If you have both services, you've already had the chance to watch all of it multiple times before the swap.
Add very poor programming choices, humor so poor they have to use canned laughter to tell you where the punch line is so you can't possibly miss what was supposed to be funny, reality shows that are anything but, soaps that hold no interest whatever, and there is very little left actually worth watching. Cut that broadcast of the show by the commercial time and you have very little left.
So I cut the cord way back then. I don't own a tv, don't want one, have no plans to ever buy another. Nor will I miss the subpar programming.
One thing I did notice is that now-a-days, I realize just how obnoxious commercials are. When at someone else's house and one comes on, I want to get up and leave as it is the equivalent to nails on the chalk board.
I no longer fork up and haven't for a goodly long time, any money for PPV or for running a tv. Tv watching is no longer a pastime in this house.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
no tears
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Incompatible business model
Provider(s) -> Carrier(s) -> Consumer
The carriers are RF (over the air), Satellite, Cable, TCP/IP (aka Internet).
The game is changing. The entertainment industry is resistant to change because it's worked well for a long time and even today still rakes in a ton of dough for them. Basically the carrier was the middle man. The providers had no contact with the end consumer. This allowed the providers to avoid competition and they could charge whatever they wanted since they controlled the content the provider could offer to the consumer.
Today, consumers have choice and consumers are waking up and realizing they can avoid the problem of a single carrier and opt to drop it altogether and use alternative methods of entertainment. The traditional model is dying. It's only a short matter of time before we hear the industry start crying for taxes to be levied to support the dying industry. Yes, this is a repeat of the music industry woes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A woo hoo, a woo hoo.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A woo hoo, a woo hoo.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The cable program cost/retrans fee dilemma
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All MSOs are losing out to Telco and to a lesser extent, DBS.
Last 4 quarters (3Q09 to 2Q10):
Cable lost 1.6MM HHs
Telcos gained 1.2MM HHs
DBS gained .8MM HHs
Net gain .4MM HHs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cut the cord
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cut the cord in Canada too!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]