Campaign Says It Was Duped Into Believing Morgan Freeman Would Do A Political Ad For Their Candidate

from the publicity-rights? dept

Apparently, the campaign of BJ Lawson, who just lost in his bid to take a Congressional seat away from Rep. David Price in North Carolina, claimed that actor Morgan Freeman did the voiceover on their recent campaign ad:
The campaign claimed that the ad was "resonating" with voters. However, after the press started asking about the ad, Lawson's campaign announced that Freeman had recorded the voiceover for the ad (at less than his usual rates, implying his further support of Lawson's campaign), Freeman denounced the campaign as lying, saying that he did not record the commercial, does not support the candidate and that "no one who represents me ever has ever authorized the use of my name, voice or any other likeness in support of Mr. Lawson or his candidacy."

Following that, the Lawson campaign pulled down its press release announcing that Freeman had done the ad, and replaced it with an announcement claiming they were scammed by a contractor named MEI Political, and going so far as to actually post the contract and emails that had gone back and forth over this (which show a fee of $4,500, which you have to assume is way below Freeman's going rate):


If you look at the emails the campaign had initially suggested a play on the "Priceless" Mastercard commercials, and the guy from MEI warns them that Mastercard has been known to sue over such copying, so at least that time MEI knew to warn about potential intellectual property issues.

The guy from MEI Political, Ben Mathis, has responded with a press release and by releasing other emails himself, claiming that all along he was clear that it was Morgan Freeman's "voice double" and stating that the campaign could not claim Morgan Freeman made the ad:
Reading through all of this, it does sound like there was some pretty serious miscommunications going on. From what's been presented by both sides, it looks like MEI told the Lawson campaign that it had some actual celebrities and some voice doubles, making it clear in the initial email that with the doubles, you couldn't name the celebrities (even though many people would "recognize" the voice). However, it was in a later email that MEI appears to have lumped all of the available "voices" together in one list, and the Lawson campaign either did not remember the difference or chose to ignore it. However, it sure does look like the contract the two parties signed flat-out names Morgan Freeman, and not his double, which could put MEI in hot water. MEI also claims that it made clear, via a phone conversation, not to use Freeman's name, and the Lawson campaign did so anyway. Also, amusingly, he asks them to keep his name out of it, which the campaign clearly did not do.

Of course, it will be interesting to see if any lawsuits actually come out of this, and who, exactly, sues whom? Freeman, conceivably, could have a publicity rights claim against the campaign and against MEI. The campaign could have a suit against MEI as well if it can make the argument that the contract indicates it would actually be Freeman, not his voice double. And, you could even see how MEI might have a case against the campaign, after the campaign claimed it was "tricked" by "a political mercenary." Of course, with the election over, and Lawson losing, they all might just let it slide... Either way, while some might claim this is a perfect example of where publicity rights make sense, it seems like good old traditional fraud statutes and contract law could handle any necessary legal lifting here instead.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: bj lawson, contracts, morgan freeman, publicity rights
Companies: mei political


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Mike C. (profile), 3 Nov 2010 @ 8:17am

    Voice double actor could be the big winner...

    I'd really love to see the voice double come out ahead on this one...

    "I had a major political campaign think I was Morgan Freeman. What do you want to bet I can convince your customers too? Contact my booking agent at xxx-555-1212 for more information."

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    imbrucy (profile), 3 Nov 2010 @ 9:20am

    Good voice, but the pacing is not Freeman

    The pitch of the voice is pretty much spot on, but the pacing and inflection used gives it away as a double. Especially when he inflects his voice upwards you can easily tell the difference.

    I still must admit that the voice double did a really good job, but he is no Morgan Freeman.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      nasch (profile), 4 Nov 2010 @ 3:15pm

      Re: Good voice, but the pacing is not Freeman

      I would guess if he voiced over video of Morgan Freeman talking you wouldn't notice (if done with professional quality). Certainly most people wouldn't.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    BBT, 3 Nov 2010 @ 9:52am

    Oblig

    obligatory xkcd reference
    http://xkcd.com/462/

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Matt K., 3 Nov 2010 @ 12:35pm

    How many campaigns were doing this?

    Apparently Scott Walker's successful re-election campaign also used Not Morgan Freeman. See here: http://www.wisn.com/news/25558766/detail.html

    That story suggests that the agency that created the Wisconsin ad is local, where MEI seems to be in California.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Matt K., 3 Nov 2010 @ 12:35pm

    How many campaigns were doing this?

    Apparently Scott Walker's successful re-election campaign also used Not Morgan Freeman. See here: http://www.wisn.com/news/25558766/detail.html

    That story suggests that the agency that created the Wisconsin ad is local, where MEI seems to be in California.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.