Thai Government Official Admits That Internet Blacklists Don't Work

from the get-rid-of-the-blacklist dept

Mon, Nov 22nd 2010 2:42am — Mike Masnick

As the US prepares to launch its own internet blacklist, it should be noted that over in Thailand, a senior government minister, Thongchai Sangsiri, overseeing internet and computer forensic related issues is saying that Thailand's internet blacklist has been a major failure and should be scrapped.

"The blacklists grow with many, many websites to become a burden on ISPs. Blacklisting doesn't work."

He later notes that putting up such a blacklist is a political move: it looks good because citizens think their government is doing something. But the reality is that it just doesn't work and just creates more burdens.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: censorship, filters, thailand

20 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 22 Nov 2010 @ 3:30am

Nice of them to admit to it.....
This news just in:
Water is WET!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Groove Tiger (profile), 22 Nov 2010 @ 6:31am
  
  Re: Nice of them to admit to it.....
  Actually water is not wet.
  Things that come in contact with water become wet.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 22 Nov 2010 @ 6:41am
    
    Re: Re: Nice of them to admit to it.....
    LoL
    
    I have one, in chemistry people use to dry liquids(a.k.a. remove water from or liquid reagent from another liquid).
    
    ps: not a chemist, just saw this video of people trying to make their own oil essences and trying to "dry" the oil LoL
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Berenerd (profile), 22 Nov 2010 @ 6:49am
    
    Re: Re: Nice of them to admit to it.....
    You say tomato..I say Chineese chicken fighting loves beer...its all the same thing...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 22 Nov 2010 @ 6:56am
    
    Re: Re: Nice of them to admit to it.....
    Actually water is not wet.
    Things that come in contact with water become wet.
    I bow to the master of superior pedantary :-)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - The Groove Tiger (profile), 22 Nov 2010 @ 7:32am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Nice of them to admit to it.....
      You're supposed to argue that water is in contact with itself.
      
      Damn... you're not even trying :(
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 22 Nov 2010 @ 8:12am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Nice of them to admit to it.....
        You're supposed to argue that water is in contact with itself.
        I would, except being pedantic water prefers to adhere to other surfaces e.g. glass, unlike for example mercury which is far more cohesive and forms a convex meniscus rather than a concave :-)
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Darren (profile), 22 Nov 2010 @ 3:35am

I see Goody Proctor
Not only do blacklists make citizens feel like the government is doing something, it also creates yet another vehicle through which finger-pointing can ensue. I understand that - according to COICA - the two blacklists would belong to the courts and the attorney general, but that wouldn't stop scared, self-righteous do-gooders from sending tips on where sites they felt should be on the blacklists reside, a la those FACT ads from the UK a few years ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 22 Nov 2010 @ 4:03am

For very big things not even white lists work.

For a decentralized network the only thing that works is a decentralized solution but of course this implies no control over what is being done LoL

The irony.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
abc gum, 22 Nov 2010 @ 4:29am

I think the US has already been COICA'd.
Has anyone else noticed an increase in DNS issues lately?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TehZomB (profile), 22 Nov 2010 @ 4:45am

Yeah, but then we still have to try it ourselves, cause you know the US can do everything better and more efficiently than all the other countries. Then once it's messed up we'll just back away slowly, turn and run while the IT department has to fix the mistake.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
abc gum, 22 Nov 2010 @ 5:24am

Internet blacklisting in the US is probably following a path similar to the wiretap fiasco in that paperwork lags implementation. All guilty parties will be exonerated and contracts will be awarded to those who cooperated.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
out_of_the_blue, 22 Nov 2010 @ 5:59am

Thailand just not comprehensive and draconian enough.
@TehZomB: you're right up to a point, but not if enough resources are thrown at it. The US already has 850,000 quasi-gov't spooks doing "something" along these lines, and resources to pay for more, besides having physical control of the root servers and other fundamental machinery. Even more importantly, the US has Google and its web parasites that track you everywhere, so can measure traffic to most sites and measure which are "problems" to the regime. In sum, the US *does* have the comprehensive mechanisms in place, now are beginning to use them and turn draconian.

By the way, incidentally heard *how* draconian jolly old England was only 200 years ago: death sentence by hanging for stealing 40 shillings, or roughly two or three weeks pay for a lower class laborer. Around then, England had 273 offenses one could get hanged for -- and without long to wait, a matter of weeks at most. Nice to live in a period where the ruling class has been beaten back from their harsh tyranny, isn't it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- CommonSense (profile), 22 Nov 2010 @ 6:56am
  
  Re: Thailand just not comprehensive and draconian enough.
  "The US already has 850,000 quasi-gov't spooks doing "something" along these lines, and resources to pay for more"
  ???????
  
  Have you not heard about the US debt and deficit problems?? How on earth could you possibly make the claim that the US has 'resources to pay for more' of anything as wasteful as this with a straight face??
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Hephaestus (profile), 22 Nov 2010 @ 6:58am
  
  Re: Thailand just not comprehensive and draconian enough.
  The difference between the US and the UK is there are more guns than people in the US. Making a police state very difficult to implement.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- nasch (profile), 22 Nov 2010 @ 8:57am
  
  Re: Thailand just not comprehensive and draconian enough.
  The US already has 850,000 quasi-gov't spooks doing "something" along these lines, and resources to pay for more, besides having physical control of the root servers and other fundamental machinery. Even more importantly, the US has Google and its web parasites that track you everywhere, so can measure traffic to most sites and measure which are "problems" to the regime.
  
  I know we're tending toward facism, but it's a bit much to imply that the root DNS servers, Google, and the US government are all one organization with a unified agenda.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Ed C., 22 Nov 2010 @ 10:19pm
    
    Re: Re: Thailand just not comprehensive and draconian enough.
    I think it's more that blue fears that with all of those resources here, the government could marshal them together, by force if need be, under a unified agenda. I though it's technically plausible, I don't see it happening without a really big push--like the scare that lead to the PATRIOT Act.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Emilio, 22 Nov 2010 @ 7:20am

MICT Blacklist
The blacklist was introduced to "protect" the Thai king, by banning sites which "insulted" the monarchy. Any attempt to scrap the scheme will be seen as a failure of MICT and a humiliating comedown for Thailand's monarchists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 22 Nov 2010 @ 8:00am

Duh! A simple networking class would have cleared that up before they made idiots of themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
naeem ahmad, 25 Jun 2011 @ 12:26pm

please help and advice
From: naeemahmad67@hotmail.com
To: pr@nesdb.go.th
Subject: HELP AND ADVICE
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 00:52:41 +0600

Resp. Sir,

It is stated that in your country have any OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR EXCHANGE CONTROL AND INTERNATIONAL. REMITTANCE DEPARTMENT. BANK OF AYUDHYA THAILAND

Because BANK OF AYUDHYA THAILAND, send me e-mails and mobile messages about the massive prize winning.
And now told me to deposit the stamp duty of 550 great britton pounds

You are requested to please seriously investigate about the said bank, why they are torture the people and play the human beings.

I think that your good ministry help us.

Thanks
naeemahmad67@hotmail.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]