Apple Forces Removal Of Steve Jobs Action Figure

from the but-why? dept

Tue, Nov 30th 2010 12:39am — Mike Masnick

A Chinese company, MIC Gadget, got some attention for its Steve Jobs figurine but some of that attention came from Apple's lawyers, who forced the company to stop selling the item. Lawyer David Canton (who pointed us to this story) does a nice job of explaining why this doesn't make much sense:

It's not as if this in practice causes any harm to Apple or Steve Jobs or confusion about their brand. It doesn't put Steve or Apple in any bad light -- in fact, it's a good likeness. And it sold quickly, so there is demand for it.

Steve and Apple are not desperate for any extra publicity, or any extra income. But instead of shutting them down -- what if they struck a deal to pay a royalty on each one, and to sell them in Apple stores -- and then Apple donate its income from this to charity.

But that would go beyond the standard mentality of "protect, protect, protect."

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: action figures, publicity rights, steve jobs, trademark
Companies: apple, mic gadget

39 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 30 Nov 2010 @ 1:08am

it isn't his idea, so it isn't a good one, therefore it needs to be shut down. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Liam (profile), 30 Nov 2010 @ 1:20am

While apple didn't have stop these being produced, they do have a very defined brand image (high quality design, simplicity etc), and these figurines really do not fit in with that, and selling them in the apple stores would damage the brand image.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mikkel Paulson (profile), 30 Nov 2010 @ 1:34am

In their defence, I don't know that I'd want a bobble head made of myself either� although I'd certainly be bemused to see someone try.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jake, 30 Nov 2010 @ 2:51am
  
  Re:
  Agreed. The legal tactics are somewhat dubious, but producing little plastic dolls in someone else's likeness without their knowledge or consent is a pretty unpleasant thing to do.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
jaron, 30 Nov 2010 @ 2:25am

yes
I agree 100%. Siunds like a hissy fit or bored lawyers!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cc (profile), 30 Nov 2010 @ 2:27am

According to the linked article, the figurine is "holding the iPhone incorrectly, in the supposed "death grip" that causes signal loss on the iPhone 4."

That, to me, sounds like the beginning of a parody defense.

Apple scared them off on trademark and copyright grounds. Perhaps the word "iPhone" is trademarked, but I doubt they have trademarks on Jobs's likeness, or copyrights on something like a 2x2mm iPhone... All in all, Apple seems to be using the courts to terrorise a produce out of existence, just because it doesn't like it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Nov 2010 @ 2:32am

Apple the eternal underdog bully.

I think there is a curse here somewhere.

Apple made some of the most innovative things I ever saw in my time and yet they always seems to get surpassed by other players that open the field to everybody. The insistence of Apple(Jobs) to try and create the ultimate monopoly always fail and he keeps trying, the guy is nothing but persistent LoL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chris, 30 Nov 2010 @ 2:47am

From famous to infamous!
Well, now this figure is an in-demand collectors' item. Wow!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Nov 2010 @ 3:00am

Ass face
MIC Gadget should put an ass where Jobs head is. Then they could say it's a parody, although actually it would be an even more accurate likeness.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
GeneralEmergency (profile), 30 Nov 2010 @ 3:01am

The inside story....
Apple's lawyers were ordered by the Apple board of directors to shut down the distribution of these Steve Jobs dolls ASAP.

It seems that these dolls, while certainly less costly than the real Steve Jobs, were proving to be more charismatic leaders, better communicators and superior technology visionaries than the real article.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Nov 2010 @ 3:05am

They should make a Steve Jobs Liver and see what Apple has to say about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rekrul, 30 Nov 2010 @ 3:18am

Apple/Jobs obviously wanted these off the market as they aren't an accurate depiction of Steve Jobs. His head should be at least twice that size...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Elliot (profile), 30 Nov 2010 @ 3:27am

What is the basis for the suit?
Can anyone clarify what exactly is Apple's claim. Can any private citizen prevent someone from using them as an action figure? (Actually, I would be flattered :-) )
If not, then how can they legally connect an image of Steve Jobs with Appler?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- nasch (profile), 30 Nov 2010 @ 12:47pm
  
  Re: What is the basis for the suit?
  I think their claim is probably that the defendant can't afford to fight a bogus lawsuit.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
alternatives(), 30 Nov 2010 @ 3:51am

Oh for a 3rd printer/injection molding machine
So I could make 'em and sell 'em.

Under a 'litigious bastard' series.

(and Jobs has been a bitter man about this stuff after the Mighty Woz's Apple ][ line was cloned. The only reason for the end to the pineapple/franklin was because the spawn of 2 lawyers - Bill Gates - had done the paperwork on the AppleBASIC section of the ROM.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chucklebutte, 30 Nov 2010 @ 5:30am

Ahhh
I wish someone would make me into a toy, that would totally be uber cool!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Memyself, 30 Nov 2010 @ 5:40am

I don't know what the law is pertaining this sort of issue, and have no idea if Apple really has a right to stop someone manufacturing on grounds of using Jobs likeness. But maybe Steve Jobs just doesn't want action figures of himself made. I really couldn't blame him if that's the case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Droslovinia, 30 Nov 2010 @ 5:56am

Problems
I think that Steve was just pissed because the action figure didn't have a socket where it could be joined at the hip with the Rupert Murdoch action figure. If they're really going to make iPad apps for Newcorp, they need to get the symbolism right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NullOp, 30 Nov 2010 @ 6:05am

Owww....
You'd think Apple would get tired of that stick up their butt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Nov 2010 @ 6:14am

Because Apple SUCKS!! They always have and always will. They will become another Microsoft that uses lawsuits rather than innovation to try and further their business. The Pirates of Silicon Valley. That's the name of the movie you need to watch. Jobs stole it all. He never had an original idea in his life. He was and is simply an opportunist. Jobs stole the code for the Mac and the Mouse from Xerox and Gates stole it from Jobs. Pirates!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 30 Nov 2010 @ 7:59am
  
  Re:
  Jobs stole the code for the Mac and the Mouse from Xerox and Gates stole it from Jobs. Pirates!!
  
  So Steve Jobs stole Smalltalk code, transformed it into 68K assembler and Pascal, then transformed it into something that was totally unlike the Xerox Star? Then Bill Gates went ahead and stole the aforementioned 68K ASM and Pascal, transformed it into x86 ASM and C, then changed it into something completely unlike the Mac?
  
  Damn. I never knew.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - JEDIDIAH, 30 Nov 2010 @ 8:47am
    
    Then vs Now.
    By modern standards, pretty much every OS in common use today would have been strangled in it's crib by the modern state of patent and copyright law and litigation.
    
    ...and consumer systems generally are always behind the curve. They get features last after they have been in academia and in more serious commercial use for decades.
    
    The mouse is actually a great example of this.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Drew, 30 Nov 2010 @ 6:56am

Of course they can't!
If they did the smart thing, then what would the LAWYERS do? They'd be bored!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lachlan Hunt (profile), 30 Nov 2010 @ 7:06am

This is clear trademark infringement, and I think Apple did the right thing. The figurines clearly used the Apple logo, which could give the false impression that they were endorsed by Apple.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spaceman Spiff (profile), 30 Nov 2010 @ 7:15am

Scarcity == value
Well, now that the original run is probably all of these dolls that will ever be made, they are now at least 10x as valuable as they were originally! My guess, someone at Apple purchased a number of them, then brought it to the attention of their bosses. Ipso resulto - banned in Cupertino!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Nov 2010 @ 7:28am

SJ
Simple... just change the face image to that of a butt, add glasses... really no change..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jeff Blaine, 30 Nov 2010 @ 8:03am

"what if they struck a deal to pay a royalty on each one, and to sell them in Apple stores -- and then Apple donate its income from this to charity." Yeah, because Apple has time to jerk around with the logistics of crap like that and has lots of brand interest in slinging figurines in their stores.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cowardly Anon, 30 Nov 2010 @ 8:03am

It honestly wouldn't surprise me if Steve Jobs has put a trademark on both his name and likeness. Though I'm not sure how that would be accomplished really...

Frankly, they should have told Apple where to stick an apple and keep selling them. :P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Nov 2010 @ 8:11am

Bobble head...
maybe they should have made his junk bigger and he wouldn't have complained, they got the size of his head right though, normally bobble heads have big heads... his looks just right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Nov 2010 @ 8:17am

is this post or pre cancer Jobs??
Apple products are just not the same after he got the cancer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Nov 2010 @ 8:17am

is this post or pre cancer Jobs??
Apple products are just not the same after he got the cancer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Keiff, 30 Nov 2010 @ 8:21am

Not very lifelike...
It's not skinny/anemic enough... this might be from 5 years ago or something... but not his current skeletor self.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
raelalt (profile), 30 Nov 2010 @ 10:24am

Doen't fit with Apple's image.
The figurine in question does not comply with Apple's official image of Steve Jobs. For instance: it is not holding a stone tablet or standing on a mountaintop.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- korgri, 22 Dec 2010 @ 2:58am
  
  Re: Doen't fit with Apple's image.
  Or maybe because they have their own iAction figure coming out in the spring?
  This may be Steve's Tom-Cruise-on-the-couch moment if he isn't careful; stock dives,
  Jobs bobble head figures appear in car windows.
  He can't drive anywhere without seeing these ridiculous things in the car in front of him...
  
  I wonder if iThey could do anything if you took the figure as is and
  replaced the head with an apple that has a bite taken out of it?
  
  Now that would be a good bobble head figure..
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Nov 2010 @ 11:05am

I hope his cancer comes back and he dies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- raelalt (profile), 30 Nov 2010 @ 11:24am
  
  Re:
  You are a sad person.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ian, 30 Nov 2010 @ 7:42pm

Parody
If it was more a satirical parody the creator would have an obvious defense. Other than that apple will simply bully tactic him into submission.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Andy, 10 Dec 2010 @ 11:06am

Looks like the first Steve Jobs action figure is on sale on US eBay!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Laura, 17 Jan 2011 @ 4:43pm

Steve Jobs Action Figure for Sale
I have one of these figures for sale if anyone is interested...
http://www.stevejobsactionfigure.com/
One of 300 in its original box and packing materials from Hong Kong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]