DailyDirt: Somewhat Alien Life And Outer Space

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Thu, Dec 2nd 2010 5:00pm — Michael Ho

The rumors had it all wrong. Nobody discovered a new lifeform on a different planet or moon -- but a new bacterium was found in California. (Why are all the alternative lifestyles living in California?) Just when everyone thinks we know how nature works, nature throws us a few curve balls. Keeps things interesting. UPDATE: Arsenic-based life has been debunked by the scientific process.

NASA-funded research discovers that arsenic can replace phosphorous in important biological molecules within living bacteria. Nobel prize worthy stuff, folks. update: well, not after this work has been debunked.... [url]
New, improved universe. Now with THREE TIMES the number of stars. [url]
Dead astronomers sometimes make for good drama. Tycho Brahe is dug up, and he might get a made-for-TV movie based on his life (and suspicious death). [url]
Via "anonymous" -- mercury can turn birds gay or something. Apparently, toxic elements can make life more interesting for all kinds of animals. [url]

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: astrobiology, life, science, space

25 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Sam (profile), 2 Dec 2010 @ 5:22pm

The full text of the arsenic bacteria study can be found here if you have a subscription to Science (e.g. if you're at a university):
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2010/12/01/science.1197258
It's a fairly accessible piece - I'm no biologist and I followed it fine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 2 Dec 2010 @ 5:24pm

Yeah, so I am a Biochemist (no really), and while I have not yet read the entire paper, if what they are speculating is true, this is HUGE. One thing that was a bit of a letdown, is it looks like these bugs evolved after the fact to utilize Arsenic (As) instead of phosphorous (P) (it would have been pretty cool if it was a completely different stump on the tree of life). But what makes this finding so immense, is not just the incorporation of As in the DNA backbone, but the possibility that As also repleases P in normal cellular activities (like protein phosphorylation (turn on and off), ATP (remember the TCA cycle?), DNA binding and supercoiling�). This paper will probably be �OK�, but in the next year, there will be some huge new advances in biochemistry; I guess it�s just the nerd in me that felt the need to make a post.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 2 Dec 2010 @ 5:37pm

Mercury
Is that why Big Bird was a bit off?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 2 Dec 2010 @ 5:40pm

I kinda figured this was true ever since Carl Sagan postulated it in Cosmos
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pixelation, 2 Dec 2010 @ 5:41pm

Just when it seems like it's time to end it all, this kind of stuff shows up.
Ah, the world can be a pretty cool place.

One question. Will the mating between carbon and arsenic based life end in death? Just askin'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 2 Dec 2010 @ 5:42pm

wtf
why are the links still obfuscated?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2 Dec 2010 @ 5:47pm

Please Don�t Do Paywalled Links
Thank you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Michael Ho (profile), 3 Dec 2010 @ 10:48am
  
  Re: Please Don�t Do Paywalled Links
  I'll be more careful about this in future DailyDirts... Sorry!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 2 Dec 2010 @ 6:29pm

"NASA-funded research discovers that " shows NASA needs more money because the government has been cutting back their funding.

There, fixed that for you.

(not saying that space exploration shouldn't be funded, just that NASA is making a big deal out of nothing because they just want money).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 2 Dec 2010 @ 6:39pm
  
  Re:
  errr... that should have read
  
  "NASA-funded research discovers that " NASA needs more money because the government has been cutting back their funding.
  
  Anyways, this is hardly surprising. Both Phosphorus and Arsenic are group five elements and so what they will bind to and how they react with other things will be similar (being that they both have five valence electrons).
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 2 Dec 2010 @ 8:09pm
    
    Re: Re:
    errr.... they're both group 15 elements * (but group 15 elements do have five valence electrons).
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Gabriel Tane (profile), 3 Dec 2010 @ 6:40am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      need some coffee? ;)
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 2 Dec 2010 @ 7:37pm
  
  Re:
  cool story bro
  
  Giving NASA that money is a much better idea than giving certain other government institutions that same money.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 3 Dec 2010 @ 10:47pm
    
    Re: Re:
    I don't necessarily disagree here, but I think that in this particular case NASA's motives seem somewhat dubious.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
DV Henkel-Wallace (profile), 2 Dec 2010 @ 7:09pm

typo
s/a new bacteria/a new bacterium/

(speaking of nerds)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AR (profile), 2 Dec 2010 @ 7:31pm

"Why are all the alternative lifestyles living in California?"

HAHAHA... Im sorry Mike, I cant help it...HAHAHA

California should copyright that ... PLEASE!

Just kidding
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chosen Reject, 3 Dec 2010 @ 8:41am

Galaxy article
I was really interested in seeing what the article about stars was. Unfortunately, it links to the New York Times.

Thankfully, I was able to find it elsewhere.

Too bad for the New York Times I guess.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dean Landolt, 3 Dec 2010 @ 9:41am

Michael

You linked to the times paywall -- please don't do that!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Michael Ho (profile), 3 Dec 2010 @ 10:55am
  
  Re:
  Sorry, folks! Thankfully, commenters here have linked to non-paywalled versions of the story.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Dec 2010 @ 10:44pm

What kinda makes me scratch my head and think that this whole thing is a ploy to get money is the fact that NASA really should have little to do with the finding of some �new� bacteria on Earth. This should be some bio agency or maybe the bio department of some university or maybe the NSF. NASA should be focused on space related discoveries, not bio related ones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- timmmmm, 4 Dec 2010 @ 12:51am
  
  Re:
  This "new" bacteria *is* a space-related discovery -- in that it helps NASA determine where extraterrestrial life may be found. Previously, everyone would think that life isn't possible where there is too much arsenic... Now we know that if we find a moon with a lot of arsenic, that we can't eliminate the possibility of life existing there (if all the other conditions are right).
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 4 Dec 2010 @ 8:25am
    
    Re: Re:
    "This "new" bacteria *is* a space-related discovery -- in that it helps NASA determine where extraterrestrial life may be found."
    
    This is the biggest load of nonsense I've ever saw. A moon made of arsenic? Really?
    
    The discovery was made on Earth, not in space. The fact that it could be found in space in the future doesn't make it a space discovery yet. Space related? That's too ambiguous and can cover way too much.
    
    Under your argument, almost every new biological discovery can somehow be twisted to be a space relate one. Not too long ago we didn't know DNA coded for proteins and we didn't even know what proteins are. Hence DNA and proteins are space related discoveries because now we can look for a moon made of DNA and proteins (or the elements that make them up). Every element discovered to be used in cells now becomes a space related discovery. So then why did biologists, and not astronomers, make these discoveries?
    
    Heck, the discovery of the first tree can be said to be a space related discovery, because now we might find a tree in space too since there is a possibility for trees to exist. The discovery of any animal or cell or new bacteria or even the discovery of humans is a space related one, it's possible for them to exist in space too.
    
    Even if arsenic cells can potentially be found in space, that's hardly NASA's domain right now. NASA should stick with space discoveries, what's in space, not making discoveries that could be in space. Let the biologists discover that arsenic can be used for life and then NASA can read that literature and start looking, but for NASA to start taking the role of biologists at this stage seems suspicious.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 4 Dec 2010 @ 8:31am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      (and I'm not necessarily saying that there is anything wrong with NASA making these discoveries, it just seems like they are mostly doing it because they want money at this stage. Maybe it's a good thing because the need for money can encourage agencies to make more discoveries, but the point is that the motive seems perverse).
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Dec 2010 @ 8:11am

"NASA-funded research discovers that arsenic can replace phosphorous in important biological molecules within living bacteria. Nobel prize worthy stuff, folks. [url] "

This is hardly noble prize worthy. Something noble prize worthy would be like a cure to AIDS (though Aids has long been mostly curable thanks to the possibility of genetic engineering. One can genetically engineer bone marrow to produce aids resistant antibodies, but pharmaceutical corporations will not allow it). The noble prize these days has turned into more of a joke than anything. Where are the cures to things? It's not that things aren't curable, it's that there is more incentive to indefinitely treat a disease than to cure anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 4 Dec 2010 @ 8:25am
  
  Re:
  (and lets not forget that Obama got a noble peace prize because .... the foundation wants money?)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]