What Would Happen If Wikileaks Got Its Own Top Level Domain?
from the a-freedom-tld? dept
With all the talk about how the whole Wikileaks/domain name seizures issue is about a centralized vs. decentralized internet and even talk of a more decentralized DNS system, IP Watch raises an interesting question. With ICANN's plans to allow just about any TLD, what would happen if Wikileaks were to apply for its very own TLD?Given ICANN's official statement that it does not take down domain names and has no technical or legal authority to participate in such forms of censorship (and, in fact, we've noted in the past that ICANN has refused to meet with IP Czar Victoria Espinel about this, noting that it would not be appropriate), would it allow such a TLD to be created, and then take a hands off approach?
What if it wasn't even a .wikileaks (or just .leaks) TLD, but a more general .open DNS, managed by an organization that agreed not to censor anything, no matter what the cause?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: dns system, icann, openness, tld, top level domain, wikileaks
Companies: icann, wikileaks
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Answer...
Then Joe Lieberman would shit himself. Period.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Answer...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Answer...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Answer...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Answer...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Answer...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
8.8.8.8
8.8.4.4
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
.leaks is about as likely as .pedophile or .mafia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The existence of the .biz domain suggests otherwise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
its already happening
whether it happens via peer to peer dns or another method, it's basically going to happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nothing more significant than if it doesn't. wikileaks for all intents and purposes is an idea more than a website.
The idea is that information will find a way out there, and this is the very beginning of how it all starts.
An example: Wikileaks doesn't contain credit card numbers or SSN's, that will be amongst the next steps, and it won't even be released by criminal gangs, it'll be released with concerned Sysadmins that want better ways to conduct financial transactions and maintain identity. 16/9-digit unencrypted codes is not a secure method of maintaining identity/financial identity. Eventually, an entire current list of United States Social Security numbers will be released publicly, throwing commerce a fairly big jolt. The number will be fairly useless, as fraud becomes trivial in the archaic way we use this number.
We can either prepare for it now and change to a different method, or watch as our economy slowly crumbles based on legacy ideas that this information will stay forever secure and locked up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
managed by an organization that agreed not to censor anything
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I like this better
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Isn't that counter productive
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Isn't that counter productive
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]