Rovi Sues Amazon For Not Licensing Its Electronic TV Guide Patent
from the maybe-they-can-trade-one-click dept
Rovi, the DRM company which recently changed its name from Macrovision, surprised some folks three years ago, when it bought Gemstar/TV Guide. However, in that deal, Rovi got a bunch of patents, and now it's suing Amazon over its IMDB site, claiming the company is violating five different patents concerning electronic programming guides (i.e., tv listings). If this sounds ridiculous to you, welcome to today's patent system. The specific patents are listed here:- 7,603,690: Interactive television program guide system with pay program package promotion
- 7,493,643: Program guide system with video-on-demand browsing
- 6,769,128: Electronic television program guide schedule system and method with data feed access
- 6,275,268: Electronic television program guide with remote product ordering
- 5,988,078: Method and apparatus for receiving customized television programming information by transmitting geographic location to a service provider through a wide-area network
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: patents, programming guides, tv
Companies: amazon, rovi
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I read it backwards.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I read it backwards.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There should be few if any digital patents...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: There should be few if any digital patents...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: There should be few if any digital patents...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: There should be few if any digital patents...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: There should be few if any digital patents...
Parent Continuity Data Description Parent Number Parent Filing or 371(c) Date Parent Status Patent Number
This application is a Continuation in part of 07/848,338 03-09-1992 Abandoned -
is a Continuation-in-part of 07/802,249 12-04-1991 Abandoned -
is a Continuation-in-part of 07/796,702 11-21-1991 Abandoned -
is a Continuation-in-part of 07/595,393 10-10-1990 Abandoned -
is a continuation of 07/484,175 02-23-1990 Patented 4,963,994
is a continuation of 07/213,162 06-29-1988 Patented 4,908,713
is a continuation of 06/634,179 07-24-1984 Abandoned -
is a continuation of 06/330,111 12-14-1981 Abandoned -
Child Continuity Data
08/947,950 filed on 10-09-1997 which is Patented claims the benefit of 08/287,343
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow...rational thinking about patents
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: There should be few if any digital patents...
"select * from program;" is not terribly inventive.
THIS is precisely the sort of nonsense when I am talking about when I speak of corporations stealing MY PERSONAL ability to benefit from the product of MY own intellect.
Databases are very old things. Even relational databases are pretty old and there are other technologies that even predate that. I am sure that some old fart could give some relevant COBOL examples.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Edison revisited
1. Take dictionary
2. Extract noun (eg light , pencil etc etc)
3. Prefix electic
4. Patent
Current patenting method
1.Take dictionary
2.Extract noun
3. prefix "Computer" and /or "Online"
4. Patent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Edison revisited
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Edison revisited
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Edison revisited
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101213/19555212261/dailydirt-remember-when-wireless-just-mea nt-radio.shtml
I'm actually surprised that this kind of innovation is coming from the U.K. Shows they at least still have some innovative potential. Of course it's not coming out of the U.S. , we're never at cutting edge of technology anymore. Now most of our innovation consists of patents on ideas that were copied from other countries. I was reading about the latest camera pill the other day and guess who developed it? Japan. The only thing the U.S. is at the cutting edge of these days is IP litigation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ummm Sky?
If Sky came up with it "on their own" then that's the "1/2 decent programmer" qualification out the window as I've always assumed judging by the quality of their software that programming was done by an extensive team of lobotomized monkeys on LSD.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ummm Sky?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Ummm Sky?
I would like to make it clear that no insult was intended to any primates and I realise that I was clearly in error in comparing their programming ability with any employees of large media companies. I accept that whatever medical procedure the primates in question may or may not have undergone is no justification for such base assertions. I apologise wholeheartedly to any monkeys upset by my statement and undertake not to make such staements in future. Furthermore I would like to make it clear to any hippies or drug lords reading that it was in no way intended to malign any recreational drug products as having any potential negative effect on the ability to code.
Hmmm think I got waway with it *phew*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Ummm Sky?
/not sure how that enters into the conversation, but there it is...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Ummm Sky?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Ummm Sky?
We had the same problem when we turned on our infinite improbability generator. It was ok, though, as they all turned into a bowl of petunias and a rather confused looking whale.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Given Macrovision was a huge success, isn't this outcome expected?
When one can't innovate, litigate to pay the bills.
I put this statement on my vehicle as a bumper sticker.
I was sued 22 times, for copyright infringement, in just one day and on my way to work at a non-profit organization.
I went to 22 separate trials and was found guilty in all of them. I now owe 353,459 people $135,475,435,893,782 (damn lawyer fees), because they all claim to "own" the copyright.
Luckily, I have a patented (and DRM) piece of software to make this all go away.
Unfortunately, I couldn't get it to install, so I downloaded a copy via BitTorrent and it installed beautifully.
This action apparently got the attention of 139 lawyer firms, because each one is asking for $2000 or "be sued". I decided on the latter.
Here we go again!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Think Teletext
Wouldn't teletext be the original form of electronic program guides?
I don't really know how all this prior-art crap works but teletext goes back to 1973-74 so how the heck does a 1991 (or even 1981) patent trump that!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]