Guy Sued Over Trademark On 'Fruit Of The Month Club' Turns Around And Sues Others Over 'Cheese Of The Month Club'

from the wrong-lesson-learned dept

Sometimes people who are sued over highly questionable copyright, patent or trademark laws turn into activists against the abuse of those laws (or against those laws altogether). At other times... the opposite occurs, and they realize that if others can abuse the law to their own benefit, they might as well too. Eric Goldman has the story of a guy, Anshu Pathak, who was sued a few years ago for offering a Fruit of the Month Club, which the company Harry & David claimed infringed on their own trademark. While Pathak fought this, now he's turned around and done pretty much the same thing, suing a bunch of companies, including Harry & David, over his own trademark on "Cheese of the Month Club." Apparently he more or less copied one of the earlier lawsuits. He includes Google, Microsoft and Yahoo in the lawsuit because of keyword ad sales on the term -- an argument that's unlikely to get very far.

Of course, Goldman does a nice job of expressing (with only slightly uncharacteristic exasperation) how silly this whole thing is:
What a load of nonsense. The world would be a better place if we just declared the phrase "[food] of the month club" generic so that no one could claim a trademark in it. Even if the phrase once was descriptive and thus capable of secondary meaning, it has become genericized through overuse. In contrast, so long as we recognize trademark rights in watered-down descriptive terms like "[Food] of the month clubs," we get bogus disputes between companies with crummy trademarks, all of them tearing each other down rather than actually doing a better job for their customers. What a shame.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: anshu pathak, cheese of the month club, fruit of the month club, of the month, trademark


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    Any Mouse (profile), 14 Jan 2011 @ 5:28am

    Heh. That was pretty much my thought when I saw the title of this. ' of the month' has been around for a long, long time. I can't think of ever having connected it to any one company.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Jan 2011 @ 5:53am

    Announcing...

    The Techdirt "Post of the month" club

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Jan 2011 @ 6:02am

    Can't lick them, then join them. What's the big deal? Sounds like Pathak is just dealing with reality.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Jan 2011 @ 6:09am

    Dumb@$$ of the month:; Anshu Pathak

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Jan 2011 @ 6:31am

    The Fruit of the Loom guys are on the sidelines, sharpening their weapons...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    Shane C (profile), 14 Jan 2011 @ 6:40am

    Abuse

    This is an interesting psychological twist on an abuse victim. Children being abused growing up, often (NOT ALWAYS) go on to either be anti-abuse activists, or they go on to abuse their own children.

    In this simile, the guy was abused, so now feels the need to go about abusing others?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Joe Club, 14 Jan 2011 @ 6:50am

    Eureka!

    I wonder if "Theme of the Month Club" has been Trademarked. I would totally defend my legal rights for the advertising and branding for any club based off of a monthly theme.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. icon
    Lion XL (profile), 14 Jan 2011 @ 7:23am

    I see his

    I like his approach, and it may help draw attention to the stupidity of such claims. Pathak may or may not be serious, but it will give this nonsense the exposure it needs and since this is something the general public can understand (most of them should) that 'of the month' is beyond being copyright-able, it very well may help things

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Jan 2011 @ 8:21am

    I'm starting a Time of the Month Club. Who wants to join?

    *crickets*

    Well, screw you then!

    *doorslam*



    *muffled sobbing*

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. icon
    jjmsan (profile), 14 Jan 2011 @ 8:23am

    Re:

    I think half of the human population already has.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. icon
    Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 14 Jan 2011 @ 8:26am

    Re:

    "Sounds like Pathak is just dealing with reality."

    Sounds to me like he's doing the exact opposite of dealing with reality. Seems like he's a little delusional to my untrained eye.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Jan 2011 @ 10:08am

    Trademark of the Month club: mine now, suckers.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Adrian Lopez, 14 Jan 2011 @ 10:27am

    I'm reminded of Microsoft's recent objection to Apple's intent to trademark the term "App Store".

    Descriptive terms should never be eligible for trademark protection, secondary meaning or not. If something describes an item or service in such a way that a person seeing it would understand what it's referring to even if the brand did not exist, it shouldn't be subject to trademark protection.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  14. icon
    AG Wright (profile), 15 Jan 2011 @ 6:22am

    I can't help but think about the cheese of the month club that my parents were customers of when I was in high school back in the 60's.
    I think that there is a problem with the whole trademark system when this can even be litigated.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  15. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 May 2011 @ 4:30pm

    The guy's a freak show.

    He's also a convicted felon.

    Riverside County Superior Court, Case # RIF131496
    Anshu Pathak was convicted of a felony, inflicting serious corporal injury on a child, with enhancements for using a deadly weapon in the commission of the felony. Pathak served one year in jail, commencing 12/07/07, and is on formal probation until 12/12/2012

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.