Mysterious Non-Company 'Helping' ACS:Law Collect Fines Now Says Forget The Whole Thing
from the moving-on... dept
As ACS:Law's legal mistakes mount, there was a recent story about how the company had passed on some collections efforts to a firm called GCB, but the details suggested another total screwup. People tracked GCB back to an accounting firm, which quickly put on their website that while GCB was formed by it, it "appears to be being misused by some third party," and that it was "taking urgent steps" to end this. The details suggested some odd maneuverings:When PC Pro spoke to McLean Reid partner John Champion, he told us that GCB had been registered at that address on behalf of one his clients, David Fisher.The "friend"? Yeah, according to PCPro, it turns out that it was Andrew Crossley, the guy from ACS:Law. Either way, it seems that all this attention has scared Fisher off. An anonymous tipster alerts us to the news that if you call the phone number that GCB tells you to call to pay up, you get the following message:
Champion said that Fisher had lent his dormant company to an associate, who had been collecting the file-sharing money without his knowledge. "He just decided to help a friend out," Champion said. "He wanted a dormant company, and he said 'Oh I've got one that's not doing anything, you can have that'."
"I know Dave Fisher is put down as a director [of GCB], [but] this activity was done without him knowing what activity was happening," Champion added. "I think he's taking steps to make sure all that money's been repaid."
"If you have received a letter from GCB Ltd please disregard this letter as GCB is no longer pursuing the matter stated in the letter."Seems like Crossley and ACS:Law are going to have to try the next option.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: andrew crossley, copyright, fines, shakedowns, uk
Companies: acs:law, gcb
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
This gave me a chuckle
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This was on of those moments ...
Welcome to the year the pendulum reaches its apogee and begins swinging back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This was on of those moments ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This was on of those moments ...
Thats just it, the politicians, the IP maximalist types, do not understand. The politicians see the internet as a way to promote themselves that is trendy. The IP maximalist view the internet as a broadcast medium. Each side ascribes (definition 2) their values and world views on the internet. It means that they can't see the internet for what it is, a way of sharing information, a way to converse with others, and most importantly a place where things may get misplaced but are never lost.
We are about to come off of 400 years of copyright. The only way that can be stopped is if every communication between everyone is monitored and recorded. That is not going to happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TIME FOR PLAN E...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
but but the kiddy pron i didnt know he was doing that
you can end this discussion now
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I just noticed the above and thought this was the best place for it. Essentially Crossley is now claiming there were bomb threats which is why he has stopped working, the police deny any knowledge of them of course.
The cynic in me (which these days is most of me) immediately thinks that Crossley is trying to obfuscate the issue. He is trying to claim that the reason he has stopped is not because he is incompetant and is trying to extort money but rather because he has been threatened with violence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The controversial London-based law firm which sent tens of thousands of letters demanding payment from people it accused of illegal filesharing has dramatically quit its copyright litigations, claiming death threats are causing "immense hassle" to the lead solicitor's family.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jan/25/acslaw-ceases-filesharing-claims
perh aps they also realise the futility of such claims on such flimsly evedence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]