Australian Gov't Official Fired For Googling 'Knockers' From Home With Office Laptop

UK Commission Explains That Public Tweets Are Public

from the in-case-you-were-wondering dept

Thu, Feb 10th 2011 9:56pm — Mike Masnick

Apparently, a woman in the UK didn't seem to realize that her Twitter account was public. After finding out some of her Twitter messages were picked up and mentioned in some newspapers, she complained that this was a violation of her privacy rights. This resulted in a case before the Press Complaints Commission, who explained that information that you put out publicly is not private info. Thanks for clearing that up. Public info is public. Good to know.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: privacy, twitter, uk

34 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Torinir (profile), 10 Feb 2011 @ 10:15pm

Obvious ruling is obvious.

Yeah, yeah... I had to say it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- xenomancer (profile), 10 Feb 2011 @ 10:19pm
  
  Re:
  "Yeah, yeah... I had to say it."
  
  The same way someone was bound to bring that law suit. They just didn't do it for the lulz.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 Feb 2011 @ 10:20pm

I don't know exactly why I'm laughing but that is just hilarious.

Why people put information on public forums and expect privacy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Atkray (profile), 10 Feb 2011 @ 10:33pm
  
  Re:
  She had to enter a password to login, therefore it must be private.
  
  /sarc
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 10 Feb 2011 @ 10:53pm
    
    Re: Re:
    You just made the wheel on Mike's wagon fall off.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Chargone (profile), 11 Feb 2011 @ 1:02am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      wagons have wheels? why does nobody Tell me these things?!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - xenomancer (profile), 11 Feb 2011 @ 3:44am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        does your wagon just have four freely rotating squares on it? i hope they're all the same size!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        TamArgument, 11 Feb 2011 @ 7:49am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        "does your wagon just have four freely rotating squares on it?"
        
        That would make his wagon a freetard.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 11 Feb 2011 @ 7:57am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        it has to have squared wheeled, round wheels are patented
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - ethorad (profile), 11 Feb 2011 @ 6:36am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Only because the buggy wheel manufacturers learned from the buggy whip manufacturer's mistakes, and now continually supress anti-gravity technology.
        
        Ever wondered why it's always 20 years away?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Laurel L. Russwurm (profile), 10 Feb 2011 @ 10:31pm

it's all relative
Yes, it sounds funny when you understand that Twitter is a public forum. The thing to remember is that most of the people in the world are not aware that it is a public forum.

People sit in their private homes and type words on their computers for their friends to read. The same way people not so long ago typed letters that they put into envelopes, stamped and dropped in a mailbox. Just because many people use computers is no guarantee they understand them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Rose M. Welch (profile), 10 Feb 2011 @ 10:40pm
  
  Re: it's all relative
  The thing to remember is that most of the people in the world are not aware that it is a public forum.
  
  The thing to remember is that everyone who joins Twitter has an obligation to know what it is. I mean, they even have an option to make their posts private. What more do you want? A Twitter employee to come to your home and explain it to you?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Michael, 11 Feb 2011 @ 3:40am
    
    Re: Re: it's all relative
    "What more do you want? A Twitter employee to come to your home and explain it to you?"
    
    Is she cute?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - xenomancer (profile), 11 Feb 2011 @ 3:47am
      
      Re: Re: Re: it's all relative
      not particularly, she's the ugly twin sister of Brunhilda from Mel Brooks 'Robin Hood, Men in Tights'.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 11 Feb 2011 @ 11:30am
    
    Re: Re: it's all relative
    That is like saying private messages on Facebook will forever remain private. They won't. Eventually facebook will have a breach internally or externally, and something with the expectation of privacy will be public.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 11 Feb 2011 @ 12:31am
  
  Re: it's all relative
  The thing to remember is that most of the people in the world are not aware that it is a public forum.
  
  citation needed
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Joe (profile), 11 Feb 2011 @ 8:16am
    
    Re: Re: it's all relative
    I'll see your "citation needed" and raise you a "citation needed."
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rose M. Welch (profile), 10 Feb 2011 @ 10:39pm

They should have pasted their ruling onto a photo of a cat. She would have understood, then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 Feb 2011 @ 10:43pm

About public did anyone knew that Einstein is a trademark and copyrighted?

CNN: Granddaughter wants share of Einstein estate profits

WTF!?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- TamArgument, 10 Feb 2011 @ 10:56pm
  
  Re:
  But without virtually indefinite IP laws we wouldn't have geniuses like Einstein.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 Feb 2011 @ 10:54pm

Heavy bricks are heavy.

I always wonder if Tomoyo's Room is the source of this.

http://manga.clone-army.org/t42r.php?page=207&lang=
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mike allen (profile), 11 Feb 2011 @ 12:22am

the problem was that a newspaper published her tweets for some reason she complained the word idiot springs to mind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Christopher (profile), 11 Feb 2011 @ 12:39am

Public tweets are public.... the information BEHIND the tweet (who posted it and when) is not usually public, so that is protected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Wolfger (profile), 11 Feb 2011 @ 3:01am
  
  Re:
  That's absolutely wrong, Christopher. The tweet is public, your names (screen name and user name) are a part of every tweet. The time it was posted is fuzzy... you see "x minutes/hours/days ago" instead of a timestamp. Of course, if it says "4 minutes ago", you know exactly when.
  
  example, off a random hashtag search:
  screen name: sl33stak
  user name: Jamie A MacDonald
  @TechCrunch I prefer MY #Kickstarter project of #Detroit http://kck.st/e93ANp Well..If you're into #Photography anyways.
  7 minutes ago via Echofon
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Feb 2011 @ 1:26am

Twitter's TOS pretty clearly state you own your tweets.

Journo should have asked for permission, or it's theft.

Reproducing someone's tweets without consent is irresponsible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 11 Feb 2011 @ 5:09am
  
  Re:
  yeahbut it is not quite that simple
  (from https://twitter.com/tos)
  You retain your rights to any Content you submit, post or display on or through the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying Content on or through the Services, you grant us a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display and distribute such Content in any and all media or distribution methods (now known or later developed).
  
  You agree that this license includes the right for Twitter to make such Content available to other companies, organizations or individuals who partner with Twitter for the syndication, broadcast, distribution or publication of such Content on other media and services, subject to our terms and conditions for such Content use.
  
  Such additional uses by Twitter, or other companies, organizations or individuals who partner with Twitter, may be made with no compensation paid to you with respect to the Content that you submit, post, transmit or otherwise make available through the Services.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 11 Feb 2011 @ 11:00am
    
    Re: Re:
    Sounds like there is no real right to or expectation of privacy on Twitter. I wonder how this makes that Icelandic politician and the EFF feel right now?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - teka (profile), 11 Feb 2011 @ 5:20pm
    
    Re: Re:
    All those provisions seem to spell out that Twitter is the one with the license to display (use) any content you give them. There is nothing that says anyone without a connection or business relationship with twitter can freely use your content.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Feb 2011 @ 2:25am

Oh. My. God.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- xenomancer (profile), 11 Feb 2011 @ 3:49am
  
  Re:
  No. Way.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - btrussell (profile), 11 Feb 2011 @ 5:10am
    
    Re: Re:
    Way!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Feb 2011 @ 5:28am

Would that include private messages or @person messages sent on Twitter?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
isaac the k, 11 Feb 2011 @ 8:59am

Long Cat
Long cat is pleased by this.

Because long cat is loooooooooooooong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Feb 2011 @ 7:10pm

Twitter, Facebook, MySpace...human vanity and stupidity know no bounds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]