Copyright Is An Incentive... To Create Lawsuits

from the 'nuff-said dept

Fri, Feb 25th 2011 6:33pm — Nina Paley

I can't really add to this.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, incentives

55 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

DH's Love Child (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 6:38pm

So true
And yet, the usual trolls will try to claim that's only in response to the freetards.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 7:06pm
  
  Re: So true
  Won't somebody think of the lawyers?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Poster, 25 Feb 2011 @ 7:11pm
    
    Re: Re: So true
    ...well, I would, but the thoughts wouldn't be very nice.
    
    Or non-exculpatory.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Christopher (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 1:33am
      
      Re: Re: Re: So true
      Why wouldn't your thoughts be very nice? The fact is that EVERYONE bashes on lawyers until they need one..... frankly, if I was a lawyer and not just a paralegal, having someone come to me who had an avowed attitude like yours? Even if they were Ghandi, I would tell them "Sorry, find someone else to take your case!"
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Richard (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 4:09am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: So true
        Of course there are good and bad in every profession. There are many great lawyers out there - eg Clive Stafford-Smith, Lawrence Lessig etc etc. Here we tend to use "Lawyers" as a shorthand for a certain type of lawyer.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - someone (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 6:21am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: So true
        Even if they were Ghandi, I would tell them "Sorry, find someone else to take your case!"
        
        Someone realizes they need help from a professional the professionals response is to not help them.
        Yet another reason to dislike lawyers and/or wanabe lawyers.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2011 @ 11:31am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: So true
        We shall see. If I ever need a lawyer, i still fully expect to bash on them. Not bashing on the lawyer to his face is just a common sense and common courtesy, not a betrayal of one's own original principals. Nothing wrong with turning the tables on your enemy by becoming him as long as you revert to normal afterwards.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Chris, 26 Feb 2011 @ 3:07pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: So true
        And that is the problem with all this... Some lawyers would even turn down Ghandi if it meant they wouldn't be able to squeeze as much money as they could by taking cases that had less moral footing and higher profit margins. Some people need to start feeding the NEEDS of their soul over the DESIRES of their greedy bank accounts.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2011 @ 4:00pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: So true
        "The fact is that EVERYONE bashes on lawyers until they need one"
        
        and we wouldn't need a lawyer if it weren't for the other lawyers suing us for frivolous reasons.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Richard (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 4:23pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: So true
        Even if they were Ghandi, I would tell them "Sorry, find someone else to take your case!"
        
        In case you didn't know - Gandi was a lawyer himself...
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 27 Feb 2011 @ 6:16am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: So true
        The fact is that EVERYONE bashes on lawyers until they need one.....
        
        And the more lawyers you have, the more you need.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 27 Feb 2011 @ 8:15pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: So true
        Look dude, this lawyer bashing thing didn't started today, medieval kings(mostly the French and English for some reason) where berating that profession long before you were born.
        
        Besides what people see is not pretty. I saw a criminal lawyer once get a call from one of his clients telling him to go to a supermarket and wait 2 blocks away because they were going to rob the place and if they got caught they wanted him to be there, f'ing unbelievable, and he did, why?
        
        Because he needed the money, he had 2 children and a wife that needed things and he did all of that for them, he was a loving father and husband a good guy in his neighborhood and never sued no one, contrary to some other lawyers I knew that sued everyone that annoyed them just because they could, so even though one was doing some disgusting things to survive other were doing it just because they could, but you wouldn't know that from the outside.
        
        Lawyer bashing is a occupational hazard, get over it.
        
        Quotes:
        
        "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."
        William Shakespeare, King Henry VI Quote (Act IV, Scene II)
        
        "A countryman between two lawyers is like a fish between two cats."
        Benjamin Franklin
        
        "Lawyers are men who hire out their words and anger."
        Horace
        
        "If the present Congress errs in too much talking, how can it be otherwise in a body to which the people send one hundred and fifty lawyers, whose trade it is to question everything, yield nothing, and talk by the hour?"
        Thomas Jefferson
        
        �Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal.�
        Martin Luther King, Jr. quotes
        
        �Lawyers, I suppose, were children once.�
        Charles Lamb
        
        "It is a maxim among these lawyers, that whatever hath been done before, may legally be done again: and therefore they take special care to record all the decisions formerly made against common justice and the general reason of mankind."
        Jonathan Swift
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Not an electronic Rodent, 28 Feb 2011 @ 3:34am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: So true
        The fact is that EVERYONE bashes on lawyers until they need one.....
        Every time I've needed one it's made me want to bash on them more. A lawyer in my experience has never ever made things better even when the outcome was "good" for me.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - xenomancer (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 9:58pm
    
    Re: Re: So true
    The lawyers already own the rights to those thoughts. My incentive to independently create those thoughts is being hindered by their haughty sense of entitlement!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bas Grasmayer (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 6:54pm

Nice one, Nina!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Poster, 25 Feb 2011 @ 7:00pm

Absolutely perfect.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2011 @ 7:34pm

Nina, without violations, there would be no lawsuits.

Cause and effect. Perhaps something you should focus on?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- IronM@sk, 25 Feb 2011 @ 8:07pm
  
  Re:
  LOL!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2011 @ 8:31pm
  
  Re:
  http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/25/tolkien-estate-censo.html
  
  Tolkien estate censors badge that contains the word "Tolkien"
  
  Until today, when Zazzle emailed me to say they were pulling the buttons for intellectual property right infringement.
  
  And guess who complained about their rights being infringed?
  
  Without any proper IP reform, expect the "violations" to keep getting more and more ridiculous.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2011 @ 8:55pm
  
  Re:
  Right. It's the defendants and their misdeeds that bring about lawsuits, not the plaintiffs.
  
  In a way that I'm sure she didn't intend, Nina is right. Copyright incentivizes the creation of works that are so good, other people will "steal" them. This "theft" creates lawsuits.
  
  Therefore, copyright is an incentive to create lawsuits--lawsuits that the defendants bring on themselves.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - cc (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 9:11pm
    
    Re: Re:
    "Copyright incentivizes the creation of works that are so good"
    
    Is there evidence of that, or is that what they told you at IP jihad training?
    
    Plus, copyright is just a law. You could make a law that makes breathing illegal and sue everyone for "stealing" air. That would be one hell of an incentive for lawsuits -- it would surely keep the hot-air lawyers busy and their wallets heavy.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Chris Rhodes (profile), 28 Feb 2011 @ 7:20am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      IP jihad training
      
      Perfect! I had a good laugh at that one.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Not an electronic Rodent, 28 Feb 2011 @ 8:19am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        IP jihad training
        
        Perfect! I had a good laugh at that one.
        It did conjure an image of a guy in an expensive though slighly oversized and bulging suit shouting "COCIAu Akbar" before exploding into a huge cloud of takedown notices and subpoenas in the middle of a large Sony shop.....
        
        Um... just me then? Ah, well....
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2011 @ 11:00pm
    
    Re: Re:
    To the extent that copy'right' works are better than other works, it's only because the funding to create such works (wrongfully) heavily benefits from government imposed monopoly access to public airwaves and cableco infrastructure (and a better ability to advertise through these channels). Others have to go through a govt imposed gateway keeper to get their works advertised and played on cableco infrastructure and broadcasting spectra and those who control the use of these communication platforms are more prone to play (and advertise) works that are controlled or 'owned' by a select few. Hence the works of these select few naturally get a wider audience and this wider audience leads to better funding of better content.
    
    but, as we can see, freely available content is being produced every day on the Internet, and the quality of much of this content improves every day, as others are getting a better opportunity to get their works known and to utilize such publicity to acquire more funding.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2011 @ 9:41am
    
    Re: Re:
    "Copyright incentivizes the creation of works that are so good, other people will "steal" them."
    
    I have a few copyrighted works and I can assure you that they are complete crap. I can also assure you that copyright was no incentive at all to create them - the only incentive emerging from those copyrights is that I could sue someone for infringing upon them. In other words: I know I couldn't sell them, since they're crap, but woe betide the fool who uses them to make something new, different, and better. Ka-ching for me and my lawyer.
    
    Copyright is automatically created when a work is fixed in a tangible form. Quality of that work does not enter into the equation in any way, shape or fixed and tangible form.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2011 @ 2:15am
  
  Re:
  Nina, without violations, there would be no lawsuits.
  Cause and effect. Perhaps something you should focus on?
  
  So, you're saying that every copyright lawsuit has merit? That sounds exactly like the kind of lie copyright supporters like to tell.
  
  Abolish copyright.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Richard (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 4:10am
  
  Re:
  without violations, there would be no lawsuits
  
  You don't seriously believe that do you?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- MrWilson, 26 Feb 2011 @ 10:56am
  
  Re:
  Without copyright laws, there would be no violations.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2011 @ 7:45pm

That one is a LuLz winner.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
charliebrown (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 7:49pm

From the 'nuff said dpt (external division)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA*breath*HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA*breath*HAHAHAHAHAHAHA*breath*HAHAHAHAHA *breath*HAHAHA*breath*HAHAHA*breath*HAHA*breath*HAHAHA*breathes*HAHA-oh-oh dear.... HAHAHAHAHA!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cc (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 7:52pm

Spot on.

Has anyone else noticed that the most aggressive critics here on TechDirt are not in fact artists, but IP lawyers...

The artists we get, some of whom are actually regulars like Nina and Karl, are a lot less dogmatic about IP enforcement.

I find that rather telling about who is more concerned about their future employment when IP policy is fixed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2011 @ 8:57pm
  
  Re:
  LOL! Very true, but they're the biggest critics because they're the ones trained to see through the FUD. :)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - cc (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 9:18pm
    
    Re: Re:
    So, you consider the artists themselves too pathetic, stupid and incompetent that they can't respond for themselves.
    
    Moreover, you seem more keen to discuss matters of economic policy (such as the motives behind copyrights and patents) rather than technicalities about the current state of the law that your training covered.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Richard (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 4:13am
    
    Re: Re:
    they're the biggest critics because they're the ones trained to see through the FUD. :)
    Actually they're trained to create FUD.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2011 @ 6:12am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Trained to create and to dissect FUD. I'd agree with that.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - cc (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 6:34am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Since all you do is create FUD, you must not be a very good lawyer.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Richard (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 8:40am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Trained to create and to dissect FUD.
        and also to pretend that it exists when it doesn't.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Not an electronic Rodent, 28 Feb 2011 @ 3:30am
    
    Re: Re:
    Can't.... click... funny... enough.. for.. laughing..... lawyers.... objective.... perceptive.... trained... hah hahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahah (thud)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zacqary Adam Green (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 10:54pm

But copyright gave you the incentive to create that comic, right? RIGHT?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Nina Paley (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 6:01am
  
  Re:
  http://copyheart.org/
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2011 @ 9:44am
  
  FTFY
  Copyright provided the *inspiration* to create that comic.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tfp, 26 Feb 2011 @ 3:54am

Copyright is
Copyright is theft
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The eejit (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 4:52am
  
  Re: Copyright is
  You stole my phrase! THIEF! Now pay me 100,00 dollars or I'll sue!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- MrWilson, 26 Feb 2011 @ 10:58am
  
  Re: Copyright is
  I prefer, "Copyright is a violation."
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Loonesta, 26 Feb 2011 @ 6:37am

Sour Grapes
IF you have never created anything of value, yes, it is an invitation to litigation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RagingBid (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 8:23am

U.S. Copyright Office web quote
Here is a quote directly from the us copyright office website:

"The Office's mission is: To promote creativity by administering and sustaining an effective national copyright system."

What I have always found interesting is the people who look of un copyrighted works and register copyrights for which they never created!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BlackDrak, 26 Feb 2011 @ 10:32am

So....
Mind if I submit this creative work to other news orgs? ROFL!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- MrWilson, 26 Feb 2011 @ 11:00am
  
  Re: So....
  No, Nina doesn't mind at all.
  
  You should read the notice in lieu of a copyright notice on her site:
  
  ♡ 2011 Mimi and Eunice. Copying is an act of love. Please copy and share.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shadojak (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 4:26pm

Hmmm, apparently
all the AC commenters on TD are IP Lawyers.

Ones worried that one day, they will have to look for work, lol.

My heart bleeds for them!

/sarc/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2011 @ 7:37pm

Apparently, copyright was incentive to create this cartoon.

Nina, you fail on so many levels.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2011 @ 11:53pm
  
  Re:
  Her love of you calling her a failure was the incentive silly! So uncreative.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Feb 2011 @ 6:21am
  
  Re:
  Apparently, copyright was incentive to create this cartoon.
  Nina, you fail on so many levels.
  
  Funny, I thought it was opposition to copyright.
  
  Lying. Typical copyright supporter.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Any Mouse (profile), 27 Feb 2011 @ 8:21am
  
  Re:
  How do you come to that conclusion? Please, explain it to us since you're so far inside her head.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hiiragi Kagami (profile), 28 Feb 2011 @ 3:25am

:)
Usually, I've an issue with Nina's comics but this one stands to be her best. It's on point and 100% accurate.

Now, let's share these with politicians anxious to sign in COICA with links of the "effectiveness" of the DMCA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2011 @ 6:35am

Nina defintely hit a nerve with this one! Someone can't take a joke lol. Probably too close to the truth then, eh? Though so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]