When Law Bloggers Threaten Each Other Over Trademark
from the small-law,-small-law,-small-law dept
We've covered plenty of trademark bullying stories over the years, and even though there are plenty of trademark lawyers who still get involved in bullying, it's always seemed that the community of law bloggers knew better than to attack each other over bogus trademark claims. However, Aaron Street from the Lawyerist blog alerts us to the news that another blogger, "TechnoLawyer," hired the big IP law firm Fish & Richardson to send him a legal note (embedded below) because he dared to put up a blog post with the title Above The Law Goes Small Law in reference to a third legal blog, AboveTheLaw.com, deciding to start covering "small" law firm news. The title of the Lawyerist's post is perfectly descriptive and accurate. Yet, apparently, TechnoLawyer holds the tradmark on "SmallLaw" (note the lack of space) and says that the blog title infringes.Given that Lawyerist is using "Small Law," which is nearly identical to our client's mark SmallLaw, to identify on-line publications in the field of legal news and legal practice, we are concerned that such use will diminish our client's goodwill in its distinctive SmallLaw trademark, and cause the public to mistakenly believe that the columns to be published by Above the Law, as well as the other publications listed at the end of Lawyerist's article, may be connected or affiliated in some way with, and/or endorsed or approved by, PeerViews in violation of United States trademark and unfair competition laws.Really? I mean, really? Anyone reading the original post or just headline who isn't a complete moron, would know that Lawyerist was using the term in a perfectly descriptive sense. Claiming that this is likely to be associated with TechnoLawyer or harm their "goodwill" is simply ridiculous -- and all the lawyers involved should have known that from the beginning. I would think that pushing bogus legal threats against other legal bloggers will do a lot more harm to the goodwill than a single title on a blog post.
Meanwhile, as the Lawyerist blog tries to figure out what to do (and is asking its readers to vote in a poll), it notes that it was unsure that TechnoLawyer had much "goodwill" after being caught trying to buy votes in some silly "which blog is the prom queen" voting contest.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
That's it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think 5% of cease and desist letters are actually serious enough that any further action would be taken.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So the initial act is normally a joke so you should never flinch... except when it is isn't a joke and you actually get hit.
But you end up flinching anyway because getting hit in the arm hurts less than getting hit in the face....
If you say yes to the initial question I bet you were either a jock or a bully, probably both.
Yeah so maybe I was a bit on the geeky side as a kid and normally flinched.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Hey! Some of us "jocks" are geeks too!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think 5% of cease and desist letters are actually serious enough that any further action would be taken.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the other hand, if this goes to court and TechnoLawyer wins, I sense a new business opportunity.
-DeAngelo
www.cheerthis.com -hassle free sharing with NO login and infinite voting
www.SheenNation.com - hassle free Sheen sharing!
www.braincano.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
small law, small law
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Neil Squeelante
[ link to this | view in chronology ]