'Free' Culture Folks Discuss Models For Sustainable Creativity
from the start-thinking dept
Last year, I was invited to attend the FCForum's event on creating sustainable models for creativity in the digital age in Barcelona. Unfortunately, due to timing and conflicts, I was unable to attend, though I heard from many who were able to make it and enjoyed it. Out of that event, the FCForum has released their version 1.0 document which is described as a "How to for Sustainable Creativity." I take a bit of an issue with the title, which implicitly seems to suggest that creativity isn't naturally sustainable, and needs some sort of outside help. However, the document itself is an interesting read. It digs into what the current state of the market is in music, filmmaking, writing & publishing, fashion and software, and then looks at various economic models that can be used to support all of those. The discussions on each industry could certainly be fleshed out a bit, but there are some interesting visual representations, such as this breakdown of money going to a certain major label band:Looking over the list, there isn't anything too surprising, but it's nice to see all these ideas in one place. I'm sure some will brush this off as being nothing special, but as a 1.0 document, it really does seem like a good start in highlighting the massive spectrum of possibility for creators to make money for being creative today. Of course, what I find interesting is that this is all being put together by the folks who the legacy industry likes to (falsely) declare "pirates" who "just want stuff for free." Yet, here they are, working hard to put together a rather helpful "how to" to help creative folks earn money. What has the industry done on that front other than complain to the government and sue their fans?
Separate, but related to this, Eric Goldman points us to a similarly interesting report on sustainable business models for university presses. It could almost be an appendix to the earlier report -- though this one is much more fleshed out. It's nice to see various university publishers thinking through these business model issues, and doing a pretty thorough job of it, rather than just complaining about how everything is failing.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: business models, creativity, culture, free culture, sustainable creativity
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Advertising
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Advertising
It was put up to try and justify the ripping off music.
Too bad it's a lie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Advertising
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If that's how your budget looks, it sounds like you have no business being signed to any label, anywhere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Or was there some other point you were making?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Bad label = major label.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
/begin sarcasm
It shows that you are genuinely concerned with the guy that makes the music business possible (the artist).
/end sarcasm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Band member included in the pie
If you don't see it on the first try, keep in mind I had to stand up to position myself.
And you'll see the pixel better with the lights off; however, if you find yourself staring for more than 10 seconds or so, you likely missed it and will need to rest your eyes first.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Band member included in the pie
The joke may have failed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Band member included in the pie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Band member included in the pie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lawyer's Cuts
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course, if they add some value or setup a subscription service for even $9.99 a year, I'd bet they'd still profit more.
That's what it's really about. The labels don't want that happening, it would send them into obscurity.
It really goes for any product, once it can be replicated at will, the only way to attract business is to somehow add 'value' - such as the case in produce. Anyone can grow tomatoes, but we typically buy them. In essence, this concept has been around since the first person sold produce and made a profit.
Of course, if you could click a button and instantly pop out tomatoes, imagine the laws that Monsanto would instantly lobby for.
But in the case of produce, you are paying for convenience and time. Seems to me the recording industry, if they are to stay viable - needs to find value to add. Doesn't matter what the laws are... the can of worms is opened - people *know* you can replicate music quickly and easily. Even if torrent was squashed, it wouldn't stop people trading CD's and ripping them, or even recording them from XM/Cable Digital Feeds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pirates don't only pirate from major label acts. They don't really care who they pirate from.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]